A comparison of different heat maintenance methods implemented during a simulated half-time period in professional Rugby Union players

Mark Russell, Reuben Tucker, Christian J. Cook, Thibault Giroud, Liam P Kilduff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Objectives: In thermoneutral conditions, half-time is associated with reductions in body temperature that acutely impair performance. This laboratory-based study compared active, passive, and combined methods of half-time heat maintenance. Design: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. Methods: After a standardised warm-up (WU) and 15min of rest, professional Rugby Union players (n = 20) completed a repeated sprint test (RSSA1). Throughout a simulated half-time (temperature: 20.5±0.3°C; humidity: 53±5%), players then rested (Control) or wore a survival jacket (Passive) for 15min, or performed a 7min rewarm-up after either 8min of rest (Active), or 8min of wearing a survival jacket (Combined). A second RSSA (RSSA2) followed. Core temperature (Tcore) and peak power output (PPO; during countermovement jumps; CMJ) were measured at baseline, post-RSSA1, pre-RSSA2. Results: All half-time interventions attenuated reductions in Tcore (0.62±0.28°C) observed in Control (Passive: -0.23±0.09°C; Active: -0.17±0.09°C; Combined: -0.03±0.10°C, all p<0.001) but Combined preserved Tcore the most (p<0.001). All half-time interventions attenuated the 385±137W reduction in Control PPO (Passive: -213±79W; Active: -83±72W; Combined: +10±52W; all p<0.001); with best PPO maintenance in Combined (p≤0.001). The fastest sprints occurred in RSSA2 in Combined (6.74±0.21s; p<0.001) but Passive (6.82±0.04s) and Active (6.80±0.05s) sprints were 0.4% (p=0.011) and 0.8% (p=0.002) quicker than Control (6.85±0.04s), respectively. Conclusions: While the efficacy of passive and active heat maintenance methods was supported throughout a simulated half-time, a combined approach to attenuating heat losses appeared the most beneficial for Tcore and subsequent PPO and sprint performance in professional Rugby Union players.

LanguageEnglish
Pages327-332
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Football
Hot Temperature
Maintenance
Temperature
Humidity
Body Temperature

Cite this

@article{f53b69f3ef9d44b0a6487e6aba185a42,
title = "A comparison of different heat maintenance methods implemented during a simulated half-time period in professional Rugby Union players",
abstract = "Objectives: In thermoneutral conditions, half-time is associated with reductions in body temperature that acutely impair performance. This laboratory-based study compared active, passive, and combined methods of half-time heat maintenance. Design: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. Methods: After a standardised warm-up (WU) and 15min of rest, professional Rugby Union players (n = 20) completed a repeated sprint test (RSSA1). Throughout a simulated half-time (temperature: 20.5±0.3°C; humidity: 53±5{\%}), players then rested (Control) or wore a survival jacket (Passive) for 15min, or performed a 7min rewarm-up after either 8min of rest (Active), or 8min of wearing a survival jacket (Combined). A second RSSA (RSSA2) followed. Core temperature (Tcore) and peak power output (PPO; during countermovement jumps; CMJ) were measured at baseline, post-RSSA1, pre-RSSA2. Results: All half-time interventions attenuated reductions in Tcore (0.62±0.28°C) observed in Control (Passive: -0.23±0.09°C; Active: -0.17±0.09°C; Combined: -0.03±0.10°C, all p<0.001) but Combined preserved Tcore the most (p<0.001). All half-time interventions attenuated the 385±137W reduction in Control PPO (Passive: -213±79W; Active: -83±72W; Combined: +10±52W; all p<0.001); with best PPO maintenance in Combined (p≤0.001). The fastest sprints occurred in RSSA2 in Combined (6.74±0.21s; p<0.001) but Passive (6.82±0.04s) and Active (6.80±0.05s) sprints were 0.4{\%} (p=0.011) and 0.8{\%} (p=0.002) quicker than Control (6.85±0.04s), respectively. Conclusions: While the efficacy of passive and active heat maintenance methods was supported throughout a simulated half-time, a combined approach to attenuating heat losses appeared the most beneficial for Tcore and subsequent PPO and sprint performance in professional Rugby Union players.",
keywords = "Intermittent, Rewarm-up, Soccer, Temperature, Warm-up",
author = "Mark Russell and Reuben Tucker and Cook, {Christian J.} and Thibault Giroud and Kilduff, {Liam P}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2017.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "327--332",
journal = "Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

A comparison of different heat maintenance methods implemented during a simulated half-time period in professional Rugby Union players. / Russell, Mark; Tucker, Reuben; Cook, Christian J.; Giroud, Thibault; Kilduff, Liam P.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2018, p. 327-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of different heat maintenance methods implemented during a simulated half-time period in professional Rugby Union players

AU - Russell,Mark

AU - Tucker,Reuben

AU - Cook,Christian J.

AU - Giroud,Thibault

AU - Kilduff,Liam P

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Objectives: In thermoneutral conditions, half-time is associated with reductions in body temperature that acutely impair performance. This laboratory-based study compared active, passive, and combined methods of half-time heat maintenance. Design: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. Methods: After a standardised warm-up (WU) and 15min of rest, professional Rugby Union players (n = 20) completed a repeated sprint test (RSSA1). Throughout a simulated half-time (temperature: 20.5±0.3°C; humidity: 53±5%), players then rested (Control) or wore a survival jacket (Passive) for 15min, or performed a 7min rewarm-up after either 8min of rest (Active), or 8min of wearing a survival jacket (Combined). A second RSSA (RSSA2) followed. Core temperature (Tcore) and peak power output (PPO; during countermovement jumps; CMJ) were measured at baseline, post-RSSA1, pre-RSSA2. Results: All half-time interventions attenuated reductions in Tcore (0.62±0.28°C) observed in Control (Passive: -0.23±0.09°C; Active: -0.17±0.09°C; Combined: -0.03±0.10°C, all p<0.001) but Combined preserved Tcore the most (p<0.001). All half-time interventions attenuated the 385±137W reduction in Control PPO (Passive: -213±79W; Active: -83±72W; Combined: +10±52W; all p<0.001); with best PPO maintenance in Combined (p≤0.001). The fastest sprints occurred in RSSA2 in Combined (6.74±0.21s; p<0.001) but Passive (6.82±0.04s) and Active (6.80±0.05s) sprints were 0.4% (p=0.011) and 0.8% (p=0.002) quicker than Control (6.85±0.04s), respectively. Conclusions: While the efficacy of passive and active heat maintenance methods was supported throughout a simulated half-time, a combined approach to attenuating heat losses appeared the most beneficial for Tcore and subsequent PPO and sprint performance in professional Rugby Union players.

AB - Objectives: In thermoneutral conditions, half-time is associated with reductions in body temperature that acutely impair performance. This laboratory-based study compared active, passive, and combined methods of half-time heat maintenance. Design: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. Methods: After a standardised warm-up (WU) and 15min of rest, professional Rugby Union players (n = 20) completed a repeated sprint test (RSSA1). Throughout a simulated half-time (temperature: 20.5±0.3°C; humidity: 53±5%), players then rested (Control) or wore a survival jacket (Passive) for 15min, or performed a 7min rewarm-up after either 8min of rest (Active), or 8min of wearing a survival jacket (Combined). A second RSSA (RSSA2) followed. Core temperature (Tcore) and peak power output (PPO; during countermovement jumps; CMJ) were measured at baseline, post-RSSA1, pre-RSSA2. Results: All half-time interventions attenuated reductions in Tcore (0.62±0.28°C) observed in Control (Passive: -0.23±0.09°C; Active: -0.17±0.09°C; Combined: -0.03±0.10°C, all p<0.001) but Combined preserved Tcore the most (p<0.001). All half-time interventions attenuated the 385±137W reduction in Control PPO (Passive: -213±79W; Active: -83±72W; Combined: +10±52W; all p<0.001); with best PPO maintenance in Combined (p≤0.001). The fastest sprints occurred in RSSA2 in Combined (6.74±0.21s; p<0.001) but Passive (6.82±0.04s) and Active (6.80±0.05s) sprints were 0.4% (p=0.011) and 0.8% (p=0.002) quicker than Control (6.85±0.04s), respectively. Conclusions: While the efficacy of passive and active heat maintenance methods was supported throughout a simulated half-time, a combined approach to attenuating heat losses appeared the most beneficial for Tcore and subsequent PPO and sprint performance in professional Rugby Union players.

KW - Intermittent

KW - Rewarm-up

KW - Soccer

KW - Temperature

KW - Warm-up

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020905731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 327

EP - 332

JO - Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

T2 - Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 3

ER -