A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries

Keith Baker, Gerry STOKER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract: The British, American, French and Finnish governments are seeking to promote investment in a new generation of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power programmes are delivered through networks of international companies through which government must manage. This is consistent with the concept of governance. Governments can advance their policy goals by using a variety of policy instruments to shape and organize governance networks. This is known as metagovernance. The paper considers the extent to which the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern is informed by the prevailing tradition of government. The paper examines how the British, American, French and Finnish governments have tried to metagovern. It is shown that whilst governing traditions do inform the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern, the composition of the network, and the nature of the policy problem also plays a role in shaping government action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-156
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nuclear power
governance
nuclear power plant

Cite this

@article{3fc7933356af4004aee0e06d5fc8614e,
title = "A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries",
abstract = "Abstract: The British, American, French and Finnish governments are seeking to promote investment in a new generation of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power programmes are delivered through networks of international companies through which government must manage. This is consistent with the concept of governance. Governments can advance their policy goals by using a variety of policy instruments to shape and organize governance networks. This is known as metagovernance. The paper considers the extent to which the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern is informed by the prevailing tradition of government. The paper examines how the British, American, French and Finnish governments have tried to metagovern. It is shown that whilst governing traditions do inform the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern, the composition of the network, and the nature of the policy problem also plays a role in shaping government action.",
keywords = "comparative policy, governance, metagovernance, nuclear power, policy implementation",
author = "Keith Baker and Gerry STOKER",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13876988.2014.889901",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "140--156",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis",
issn = "1387-6988",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries. / Baker, Keith; STOKER, Gerry.

In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2015, p. 140-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries

AU - Baker, Keith

AU - STOKER, Gerry

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Abstract: The British, American, French and Finnish governments are seeking to promote investment in a new generation of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power programmes are delivered through networks of international companies through which government must manage. This is consistent with the concept of governance. Governments can advance their policy goals by using a variety of policy instruments to shape and organize governance networks. This is known as metagovernance. The paper considers the extent to which the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern is informed by the prevailing tradition of government. The paper examines how the British, American, French and Finnish governments have tried to metagovern. It is shown that whilst governing traditions do inform the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern, the composition of the network, and the nature of the policy problem also plays a role in shaping government action.

AB - Abstract: The British, American, French and Finnish governments are seeking to promote investment in a new generation of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power programmes are delivered through networks of international companies through which government must manage. This is consistent with the concept of governance. Governments can advance their policy goals by using a variety of policy instruments to shape and organize governance networks. This is known as metagovernance. The paper considers the extent to which the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern is informed by the prevailing tradition of government. The paper examines how the British, American, French and Finnish governments have tried to metagovern. It is shown that whilst governing traditions do inform the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern, the composition of the network, and the nature of the policy problem also plays a role in shaping government action.

KW - comparative policy

KW - governance

KW - metagovernance

KW - nuclear power

KW - policy implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929294535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comparison-state-traditions-revival-nuclear-power-four-countries

U2 - 10.1080/13876988.2014.889901

DO - 10.1080/13876988.2014.889901

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 140

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

JF - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

SN - 1387-6988

IS - 2

ER -