인터넷상의 반론권 적용에 대한 비판적 이해

Translated title of the contribution: A Critical Understanding on the ‘Right of Reply’ to the Internet Media in South Korea

Jaejin Lee, Sangwoo Kim, Yoonmo SANG

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined how the right of reply is being applied to the internet media and what are the major legal issues of the right of reply system on the net. Under the Press Arbitration and Damage Redemption Act, because the right of reply is just applied to Internet Newspaper, there have been lots of issues in properly redeeming the repuational griefs by use of right of reply system. As the revision of the Press Arbitration Law is expected in the near future, how the right of reply can be used to make a balance between the freedom of expression and reputational right of the internet users has become the most critical legal and academic issue. Since there are no related legal cases, this study analyzed the previous research and the results of the arbitration of the Press Arbitration Commission (PAC) in regard of right of reply on the net for the last three years. As a result, it was found that the special arbitration committee for the internet should be established under the PAC. More than anything else, the right of reply should be applied not only to internet newspaper but also to other types of internet media such as internet portal or Eonronsa dot com.
Also, the way that the reply is published or broadcast on the net should be different from that of off-line media. To allow the retraction of news or information in lieu of publication of reply can be used as an alternative way of redeeming the damages on the internet. Given the fact that most European countries accept the right of reply system, we should develop a unique system which is quite fit to our changing media environment.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)295-327
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research
Volume7
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

South Korea
arbitration
Internet
arbitration committee
newspaper
damages
broadcast
news
act
Law

Cite this

@article{52020d00000d474684c1b1371d949822,
title = "인터넷상의 반론권 적용에 대한 비판적 이해",
abstract = "This study examined how the right of reply is being applied to the internet media and what are the major legal issues of the right of reply system on the net. Under the Press Arbitration and Damage Redemption Act, because the right of reply is just applied to Internet Newspaper, there have been lots of issues in properly redeeming the repuational griefs by use of right of reply system. As the revision of the Press Arbitration Law is expected in the near future, how the right of reply can be used to make a balance between the freedom of expression and reputational right of the internet users has become the most critical legal and academic issue. Since there are no related legal cases, this study analyzed the previous research and the results of the arbitration of the Press Arbitration Commission (PAC) in regard of right of reply on the net for the last three years. As a result, it was found that the special arbitration committee for the internet should be established under the PAC. More than anything else, the right of reply should be applied not only to internet newspaper but also to other types of internet media such as internet portal or Eonronsa dot com.Also, the way that the reply is published or broadcast on the net should be different from that of off-line media. To allow the retraction of news or information in lieu of publication of reply can be used as an alternative way of redeeming the damages on the internet. Given the fact that most European countries accept the right of reply system, we should develop a unique system which is quite fit to our changing media environment.",
author = "Jaejin Lee and Sangwoo Kim and Yoonmo SANG",
year = "2008",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "7",
pages = "295--327",
journal = "Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research",
issn = "1976-1996",
number = "2",

}

인터넷상의 반론권 적용에 대한 비판적 이해. / Lee, Jaejin; Kim, Sangwoo; SANG, Yoonmo.

In: Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2008, p. 295-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 인터넷상의 반론권 적용에 대한 비판적 이해

AU - Lee, Jaejin

AU - Kim, Sangwoo

AU - SANG, Yoonmo

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This study examined how the right of reply is being applied to the internet media and what are the major legal issues of the right of reply system on the net. Under the Press Arbitration and Damage Redemption Act, because the right of reply is just applied to Internet Newspaper, there have been lots of issues in properly redeeming the repuational griefs by use of right of reply system. As the revision of the Press Arbitration Law is expected in the near future, how the right of reply can be used to make a balance between the freedom of expression and reputational right of the internet users has become the most critical legal and academic issue. Since there are no related legal cases, this study analyzed the previous research and the results of the arbitration of the Press Arbitration Commission (PAC) in regard of right of reply on the net for the last three years. As a result, it was found that the special arbitration committee for the internet should be established under the PAC. More than anything else, the right of reply should be applied not only to internet newspaper but also to other types of internet media such as internet portal or Eonronsa dot com.Also, the way that the reply is published or broadcast on the net should be different from that of off-line media. To allow the retraction of news or information in lieu of publication of reply can be used as an alternative way of redeeming the damages on the internet. Given the fact that most European countries accept the right of reply system, we should develop a unique system which is quite fit to our changing media environment.

AB - This study examined how the right of reply is being applied to the internet media and what are the major legal issues of the right of reply system on the net. Under the Press Arbitration and Damage Redemption Act, because the right of reply is just applied to Internet Newspaper, there have been lots of issues in properly redeeming the repuational griefs by use of right of reply system. As the revision of the Press Arbitration Law is expected in the near future, how the right of reply can be used to make a balance between the freedom of expression and reputational right of the internet users has become the most critical legal and academic issue. Since there are no related legal cases, this study analyzed the previous research and the results of the arbitration of the Press Arbitration Commission (PAC) in regard of right of reply on the net for the last three years. As a result, it was found that the special arbitration committee for the internet should be established under the PAC. More than anything else, the right of reply should be applied not only to internet newspaper but also to other types of internet media such as internet portal or Eonronsa dot com.Also, the way that the reply is published or broadcast on the net should be different from that of off-line media. To allow the retraction of news or information in lieu of publication of reply can be used as an alternative way of redeeming the damages on the internet. Given the fact that most European countries accept the right of reply system, we should develop a unique system which is quite fit to our changing media environment.

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 295

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research

JF - Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research

SN - 1976-1996

IS - 2

ER -