A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the effects of interferential therapy on experimentally induced pain using a cross-over design

Abulkhair Beatti, Kylie Tucker, Lucy S. Chipchase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the analgesic effect of interferential therapy (IFT) on experimentally induced anterior knee pain. Methods: A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation was undertaken on 10 healthy subjects. Anterior knee pain was induced by an injection of hypertonic saline into the medial infrapatellar fat pad. Immediately, following the injection, subjects received 20 minutes of each of the following conditions: control, placebo IFT, 4 Hz IFT, or 100 Hz IFT, in random order on four separate days. Pain severity and the size of the painful region every 30 seconds were recorded until pain ceased. The location of the pain was recorded at 2, 7, and 12 minutes after the painful injection using a standardized figure of the knee divided into nine segments. Results: There was no effect of condition on pain severity, size of painful area, maximum reported pain severity, maximum size of painful area, duration of pain, total pain severity, and the total size of the painful area (all P > 0.09). There was no interaction between time and condition on pain severity and size of painful area (P > 0.05). However, the location of pain was more dispersed at 7 minutes in the control condition (8/9 segments) compared with the placebo, 4 and 100 Hz conditions (2/9, 1/9, and 3/9 segments, respectively). Discussion: This preliminary study indicates that IFT is not effective at reducing acute experimentally induced pain when the severity or size of the painful area is measured. However, IFT may be effective by limiting pain spreading from the source. Further research with a larger sample size is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-122
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Musculoskeletal Medicine
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cross-Over Studies
Placebos
Pain
Therapeutics
Knee
Injections
Double-Blind Method
Sample Size
Analgesics
Adipose Tissue
Healthy Volunteers

Cite this

@article{c2936e14457e43ed9f310c82eefda127,
title = "A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the effects of interferential therapy on experimentally induced pain using a cross-over design",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate the analgesic effect of interferential therapy (IFT) on experimentally induced anterior knee pain. Methods: A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation was undertaken on 10 healthy subjects. Anterior knee pain was induced by an injection of hypertonic saline into the medial infrapatellar fat pad. Immediately, following the injection, subjects received 20 minutes of each of the following conditions: control, placebo IFT, 4 Hz IFT, or 100 Hz IFT, in random order on four separate days. Pain severity and the size of the painful region every 30 seconds were recorded until pain ceased. The location of the pain was recorded at 2, 7, and 12 minutes after the painful injection using a standardized figure of the knee divided into nine segments. Results: There was no effect of condition on pain severity, size of painful area, maximum reported pain severity, maximum size of painful area, duration of pain, total pain severity, and the total size of the painful area (all P > 0.09). There was no interaction between time and condition on pain severity and size of painful area (P > 0.05). However, the location of pain was more dispersed at 7 minutes in the control condition (8/9 segments) compared with the placebo, 4 and 100 Hz conditions (2/9, 1/9, and 3/9 segments, respectively). Discussion: This preliminary study indicates that IFT is not effective at reducing acute experimentally induced pain when the severity or size of the painful area is measured. However, IFT may be effective by limiting pain spreading from the source. Further research with a larger sample size is required.",
keywords = "Electrical stimulation, Experimental pain, Interferential therapy, Knee pain",
author = "Abulkhair Beatti and Kylie Tucker and Chipchase, {Lucy S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1179/1753615412Y.0000000009",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "115--122",
journal = "International Musculoskeletal Medicine",
issn = "1753-6146",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the effects of interferential therapy on experimentally induced pain using a cross-over design. / Beatti, Abulkhair; Tucker, Kylie; Chipchase, Lucy S.

In: International Musculoskeletal Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 115-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the effects of interferential therapy on experimentally induced pain using a cross-over design

AU - Beatti, Abulkhair

AU - Tucker, Kylie

AU - Chipchase, Lucy S.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Objectives: To investigate the analgesic effect of interferential therapy (IFT) on experimentally induced anterior knee pain. Methods: A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation was undertaken on 10 healthy subjects. Anterior knee pain was induced by an injection of hypertonic saline into the medial infrapatellar fat pad. Immediately, following the injection, subjects received 20 minutes of each of the following conditions: control, placebo IFT, 4 Hz IFT, or 100 Hz IFT, in random order on four separate days. Pain severity and the size of the painful region every 30 seconds were recorded until pain ceased. The location of the pain was recorded at 2, 7, and 12 minutes after the painful injection using a standardized figure of the knee divided into nine segments. Results: There was no effect of condition on pain severity, size of painful area, maximum reported pain severity, maximum size of painful area, duration of pain, total pain severity, and the total size of the painful area (all P > 0.09). There was no interaction between time and condition on pain severity and size of painful area (P > 0.05). However, the location of pain was more dispersed at 7 minutes in the control condition (8/9 segments) compared with the placebo, 4 and 100 Hz conditions (2/9, 1/9, and 3/9 segments, respectively). Discussion: This preliminary study indicates that IFT is not effective at reducing acute experimentally induced pain when the severity or size of the painful area is measured. However, IFT may be effective by limiting pain spreading from the source. Further research with a larger sample size is required.

AB - Objectives: To investigate the analgesic effect of interferential therapy (IFT) on experimentally induced anterior knee pain. Methods: A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation was undertaken on 10 healthy subjects. Anterior knee pain was induced by an injection of hypertonic saline into the medial infrapatellar fat pad. Immediately, following the injection, subjects received 20 minutes of each of the following conditions: control, placebo IFT, 4 Hz IFT, or 100 Hz IFT, in random order on four separate days. Pain severity and the size of the painful region every 30 seconds were recorded until pain ceased. The location of the pain was recorded at 2, 7, and 12 minutes after the painful injection using a standardized figure of the knee divided into nine segments. Results: There was no effect of condition on pain severity, size of painful area, maximum reported pain severity, maximum size of painful area, duration of pain, total pain severity, and the total size of the painful area (all P > 0.09). There was no interaction between time and condition on pain severity and size of painful area (P > 0.05). However, the location of pain was more dispersed at 7 minutes in the control condition (8/9 segments) compared with the placebo, 4 and 100 Hz conditions (2/9, 1/9, and 3/9 segments, respectively). Discussion: This preliminary study indicates that IFT is not effective at reducing acute experimentally induced pain when the severity or size of the painful area is measured. However, IFT may be effective by limiting pain spreading from the source. Further research with a larger sample size is required.

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Experimental pain

KW - Interferential therapy

KW - Knee pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873848537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/1753615412Y.0000000009

DO - 10.1179/1753615412Y.0000000009

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 115

EP - 122

JO - International Musculoskeletal Medicine

JF - International Musculoskeletal Medicine

SN - 1753-6146

IS - 3

ER -