A framework for understanding generative art

Alan Dorin, Jonathon McCabe, Jon McCormack, Gordon Monro, Mitchell Whitelaw

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this article we argue that a framework for the description, analysis and comparison of generative artworks is needed. Existing ideas from kinetic art and other domains in which process description is prominent are shown to be inadequate. Therefore, we propose a new framework that meets this need and facilitates the long-term aim of constructing a comprehensive taxonomy of generative art. Our framework is divided into four major components: a description of a work’s entities; its processes and their environmental interactions; and the outcomes experienced by the work’s audience. We describe a set of diverse generative artworks in terms of our framework, demonstrating how it can be applied in practice to compare and contrast them.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-259
    Number of pages21
    JournalDigital Creativity
    Volume23
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Taxonomies
    Kinetics
    Generative
    Art
    Artwork

    Cite this

    Dorin, A., McCabe, J., McCormack, J., Monro, G., & Whitelaw, M. (2012). A framework for understanding generative art. Digital Creativity, 23(3-4), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2012.709940
    Dorin, Alan ; McCabe, Jonathon ; McCormack, Jon ; Monro, Gordon ; Whitelaw, Mitchell. / A framework for understanding generative art. In: Digital Creativity. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 3-4. pp. 239-259.
    @article{bfadd216dacf445c85248e37c23d20d3,
    title = "A framework for understanding generative art",
    abstract = "In this article we argue that a framework for the description, analysis and comparison of generative artworks is needed. Existing ideas from kinetic art and other domains in which process description is prominent are shown to be inadequate. Therefore, we propose a new framework that meets this need and facilitates the long-term aim of constructing a comprehensive taxonomy of generative art. Our framework is divided into four major components: a description of a work’s entities; its processes and their environmental interactions; and the outcomes experienced by the work’s audience. We describe a set of diverse generative artworks in terms of our framework, demonstrating how it can be applied in practice to compare and contrast them.",
    keywords = "generative art",
    author = "Alan Dorin and Jonathon McCabe and Jon McCormack and Gordon Monro and Mitchell Whitelaw",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/14626268.2012.709940",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "239--259",
    journal = "Digital Creativity",
    issn = "1462-6268",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    Dorin, A, McCabe, J, McCormack, J, Monro, G & Whitelaw, M 2012, 'A framework for understanding generative art', Digital Creativity, vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2012.709940

    A framework for understanding generative art. / Dorin, Alan; McCabe, Jonathon; McCormack, Jon; Monro, Gordon; Whitelaw, Mitchell.

    In: Digital Creativity, Vol. 23, No. 3-4, 2012, p. 239-259.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A framework for understanding generative art

    AU - Dorin, Alan

    AU - McCabe, Jonathon

    AU - McCormack, Jon

    AU - Monro, Gordon

    AU - Whitelaw, Mitchell

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In this article we argue that a framework for the description, analysis and comparison of generative artworks is needed. Existing ideas from kinetic art and other domains in which process description is prominent are shown to be inadequate. Therefore, we propose a new framework that meets this need and facilitates the long-term aim of constructing a comprehensive taxonomy of generative art. Our framework is divided into four major components: a description of a work’s entities; its processes and their environmental interactions; and the outcomes experienced by the work’s audience. We describe a set of diverse generative artworks in terms of our framework, demonstrating how it can be applied in practice to compare and contrast them.

    AB - In this article we argue that a framework for the description, analysis and comparison of generative artworks is needed. Existing ideas from kinetic art and other domains in which process description is prominent are shown to be inadequate. Therefore, we propose a new framework that meets this need and facilitates the long-term aim of constructing a comprehensive taxonomy of generative art. Our framework is divided into four major components: a description of a work’s entities; its processes and their environmental interactions; and the outcomes experienced by the work’s audience. We describe a set of diverse generative artworks in terms of our framework, demonstrating how it can be applied in practice to compare and contrast them.

    KW - generative art

    U2 - 10.1080/14626268.2012.709940

    DO - 10.1080/14626268.2012.709940

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 239

    EP - 259

    JO - Digital Creativity

    JF - Digital Creativity

    SN - 1462-6268

    IS - 3-4

    ER -

    Dorin A, McCabe J, McCormack J, Monro G, Whitelaw M. A framework for understanding generative art. Digital Creativity. 2012;23(3-4):239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2012.709940