A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators

Daniel BOWEN, James NEILL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

193 Downloads (Pure)


This study reports on a meta-analytic review of 197 studies of adventure therapy participant outcomes (2,908 effect sizes, 206 unique samples). The short-term effect size for adventure therapy was moderate (g = .47) and larger than for alternative (.14) and no treatment (.08) comparison groups. There was little change during the lead-up (.09) and follow- up periods (.03) for adventure therapy, indicating long-term maintenance of the short-term gains. The short-term adventure therapy outcomes were significant for seven out of the eight outcome categories, with the strongest effects for clinical and self-concept measures, and the smallest effects for spirituality/morality. The only significant moderator of outcomes was a positive relationship with participant age. There was also evidence that adventure therapy studies have reported larger effects over time since the 1960s. Publication bias analyses indicated that the study may slightly underestimate true effects. Overall, the findings provide the most robust meta-analysis of the effects of adventure therapy to date. Thus, an effect size of approximately .5 is suggested as a benchmark for adventure therapy programs, although this should be adjusted according to the age group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-53
Number of pages26
JournalThe Open Psychology Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this