A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators

Daniel BOWEN, James NEILL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study reports on a meta-analytic review of 197 studies of adventure therapy participant outcomes (2,908 effect sizes, 206 unique samples). The short-term effect size for adventure therapy was moderate (g = .47) and larger than for alternative (.14) and no treatment (.08) comparison groups. There was little change during the lead-up (.09) and follow- up periods (.03) for adventure therapy, indicating long-term maintenance of the short-term gains. The short-term adventure therapy outcomes were significant for seven out of the eight outcome categories, with the strongest effects for clinical and self-concept measures, and the smallest effects for spirituality/morality. The only significant moderator of outcomes was a positive relationship with participant age. There was also evidence that adventure therapy studies have reported larger effects over time since the 1960s. Publication bias analyses indicated that the study may slightly underestimate true effects. Overall, the findings provide the most robust meta-analysis of the effects of adventure therapy to date. Thus, an effect size of approximately .5 is suggested as a benchmark for adventure therapy programs, although this should be adjusted according to the age group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-53
Number of pages26
JournalThe Open Psychology Journal
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Therapeutics
Benchmarking
Publication Bias
Spirituality
Self Concept
Age Groups

Cite this

@article{e18c0bfd315746058e5e02b1bd5452da,
title = "A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators",
abstract = "This study reports on a meta-analytic review of 197 studies of adventure therapy participant outcomes (2,908 effect sizes, 206 unique samples). The short-term effect size for adventure therapy was moderate (g = .47) and larger than for alternative (.14) and no treatment (.08) comparison groups. There was little change during the lead-up (.09) and follow- up periods (.03) for adventure therapy, indicating long-term maintenance of the short-term gains. The short-term adventure therapy outcomes were significant for seven out of the eight outcome categories, with the strongest effects for clinical and self-concept measures, and the smallest effects for spirituality/morality. The only significant moderator of outcomes was a positive relationship with participant age. There was also evidence that adventure therapy studies have reported larger effects over time since the 1960s. Publication bias analyses indicated that the study may slightly underestimate true effects. Overall, the findings provide the most robust meta-analysis of the effects of adventure therapy to date. Thus, an effect size of approximately .5 is suggested as a benchmark for adventure therapy programs, although this should be adjusted according to the age group.",
author = "Daniel BOWEN and James NEILL",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2174/1874350120130802001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "28--53",
journal = "The Open Psychology Journal",
issn = "1874-3501",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "1",

}

A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators. / BOWEN, Daniel; NEILL, James.

In: The Open Psychology Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2013, p. 28-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Meta-Analysis of Adventure Therapy Outcomes and Moderators

AU - BOWEN, Daniel

AU - NEILL, James

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This study reports on a meta-analytic review of 197 studies of adventure therapy participant outcomes (2,908 effect sizes, 206 unique samples). The short-term effect size for adventure therapy was moderate (g = .47) and larger than for alternative (.14) and no treatment (.08) comparison groups. There was little change during the lead-up (.09) and follow- up periods (.03) for adventure therapy, indicating long-term maintenance of the short-term gains. The short-term adventure therapy outcomes were significant for seven out of the eight outcome categories, with the strongest effects for clinical and self-concept measures, and the smallest effects for spirituality/morality. The only significant moderator of outcomes was a positive relationship with participant age. There was also evidence that adventure therapy studies have reported larger effects over time since the 1960s. Publication bias analyses indicated that the study may slightly underestimate true effects. Overall, the findings provide the most robust meta-analysis of the effects of adventure therapy to date. Thus, an effect size of approximately .5 is suggested as a benchmark for adventure therapy programs, although this should be adjusted according to the age group.

AB - This study reports on a meta-analytic review of 197 studies of adventure therapy participant outcomes (2,908 effect sizes, 206 unique samples). The short-term effect size for adventure therapy was moderate (g = .47) and larger than for alternative (.14) and no treatment (.08) comparison groups. There was little change during the lead-up (.09) and follow- up periods (.03) for adventure therapy, indicating long-term maintenance of the short-term gains. The short-term adventure therapy outcomes were significant for seven out of the eight outcome categories, with the strongest effects for clinical and self-concept measures, and the smallest effects for spirituality/morality. The only significant moderator of outcomes was a positive relationship with participant age. There was also evidence that adventure therapy studies have reported larger effects over time since the 1960s. Publication bias analyses indicated that the study may slightly underestimate true effects. Overall, the findings provide the most robust meta-analysis of the effects of adventure therapy to date. Thus, an effect size of approximately .5 is suggested as a benchmark for adventure therapy programs, although this should be adjusted according to the age group.

U2 - 10.2174/1874350120130802001

DO - 10.2174/1874350120130802001

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 28

EP - 53

JO - The Open Psychology Journal

JF - The Open Psychology Journal

SN - 1874-3501

IS - 1

ER -