A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales

Andre Zerger, Philip Gibbons, Julian Seddon, Sue Briggs, David Freudenberger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Regional-scale mapping of vegetation characteristics such as extent, configuration, composition and condition are critical for managing native vegetation. The extent and configuration of native vegetation is typically mapped using remote sensing, and plant species and communities are typically mapped using statistical models built with explanatory variables derived from GIS layers. Such research has paid limited attention to the 'condition' of native vegetation and rarely are explanatory variables derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers used together to spatially predict vegetation characteristics. We calculated two independent metrics of vegetation condition using field data measured at each of 239 0.1 ha plots. These metrics of vegetation condition were used to develop two continuous maps of vegetation condition across an area of 260,000 ha using statistical models (generalised additive models, GAMs) built with explanatory variables derived froma range of sources including digital elevation models (DEMs), metrics of landscape connective, land use mapping and satellite remote sensing. Both models included significant explanatory variables that were derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers. Using a cross-validation technique based on bootstrapping, correlations between observed plot data and predicted data for the two measures of vegetation condition were only reasonable (0.47-0.56). Improved stratified sampling which captures disturbance gradients is a priority for improving models of this type.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)65-77
    Number of pages13
    JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
    Volume91
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    vegetation
    remote sensing
    GIS
    method
    bootstrapping
    digital elevation model
    plant community
    land use
    disturbance
    sampling

    Cite this

    Zerger, Andre ; Gibbons, Philip ; Seddon, Julian ; Briggs, Sue ; Freudenberger, David. / A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2009 ; Vol. 91. pp. 65-77.
    @article{03efe352bdbc4b4782bce0aa3f6ca6b9,
    title = "A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales",
    abstract = "Regional-scale mapping of vegetation characteristics such as extent, configuration, composition and condition are critical for managing native vegetation. The extent and configuration of native vegetation is typically mapped using remote sensing, and plant species and communities are typically mapped using statistical models built with explanatory variables derived from GIS layers. Such research has paid limited attention to the 'condition' of native vegetation and rarely are explanatory variables derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers used together to spatially predict vegetation characteristics. We calculated two independent metrics of vegetation condition using field data measured at each of 239 0.1 ha plots. These metrics of vegetation condition were used to develop two continuous maps of vegetation condition across an area of 260,000 ha using statistical models (generalised additive models, GAMs) built with explanatory variables derived froma range of sources including digital elevation models (DEMs), metrics of landscape connective, land use mapping and satellite remote sensing. Both models included significant explanatory variables that were derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers. Using a cross-validation technique based on bootstrapping, correlations between observed plot data and predicted data for the two measures of vegetation condition were only reasonable (0.47-0.56). Improved stratified sampling which captures disturbance gradients is a priority for improving models of this type.",
    keywords = "Vegetation condition, GIS, Landsat, SPOT4, GAMs.",
    author = "Andre Zerger and Philip Gibbons and Julian Seddon and Sue Briggs and David Freudenberger",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "91",
    pages = "65--77",
    journal = "Landscape Planning",
    issn = "0169-2046",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales. / Zerger, Andre; Gibbons, Philip; Seddon, Julian; Briggs, Sue; Freudenberger, David.

    In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 91, 2009, p. 65-77.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales

    AU - Zerger, Andre

    AU - Gibbons, Philip

    AU - Seddon, Julian

    AU - Briggs, Sue

    AU - Freudenberger, David

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Regional-scale mapping of vegetation characteristics such as extent, configuration, composition and condition are critical for managing native vegetation. The extent and configuration of native vegetation is typically mapped using remote sensing, and plant species and communities are typically mapped using statistical models built with explanatory variables derived from GIS layers. Such research has paid limited attention to the 'condition' of native vegetation and rarely are explanatory variables derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers used together to spatially predict vegetation characteristics. We calculated two independent metrics of vegetation condition using field data measured at each of 239 0.1 ha plots. These metrics of vegetation condition were used to develop two continuous maps of vegetation condition across an area of 260,000 ha using statistical models (generalised additive models, GAMs) built with explanatory variables derived froma range of sources including digital elevation models (DEMs), metrics of landscape connective, land use mapping and satellite remote sensing. Both models included significant explanatory variables that were derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers. Using a cross-validation technique based on bootstrapping, correlations between observed plot data and predicted data for the two measures of vegetation condition were only reasonable (0.47-0.56). Improved stratified sampling which captures disturbance gradients is a priority for improving models of this type.

    AB - Regional-scale mapping of vegetation characteristics such as extent, configuration, composition and condition are critical for managing native vegetation. The extent and configuration of native vegetation is typically mapped using remote sensing, and plant species and communities are typically mapped using statistical models built with explanatory variables derived from GIS layers. Such research has paid limited attention to the 'condition' of native vegetation and rarely are explanatory variables derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers used together to spatially predict vegetation characteristics. We calculated two independent metrics of vegetation condition using field data measured at each of 239 0.1 ha plots. These metrics of vegetation condition were used to develop two continuous maps of vegetation condition across an area of 260,000 ha using statistical models (generalised additive models, GAMs) built with explanatory variables derived froma range of sources including digital elevation models (DEMs), metrics of landscape connective, land use mapping and satellite remote sensing. Both models included significant explanatory variables that were derived from satellite remote sensing and GIS layers. Using a cross-validation technique based on bootstrapping, correlations between observed plot data and predicted data for the two measures of vegetation condition were only reasonable (0.47-0.56). Improved stratified sampling which captures disturbance gradients is a priority for improving models of this type.

    KW - Vegetation condition

    KW - GIS

    KW - Landsat

    KW - SPOT4

    KW - GAMs.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.011

    DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.011

    M3 - Article

    VL - 91

    SP - 65

    EP - 77

    JO - Landscape Planning

    JF - Landscape Planning

    SN - 0169-2046

    ER -