A method for the follow-up of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes

Théophile Niyonsenga, Philippe De Wals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes are reported with increasing frequency to public health authorities. Most are random events and only a very small proportion is likely due to identifiable environmental agents. Often, a preliminary study confirms the existence of a spatial and temporal excess but no biologically plausible cause is found. These cases require a follow-up of incidence to identify any continuing excess. A conceptually simple 'fixed window' technique of follow up is proposed. The power of the test is mainly influenced by the magnitude of the increase in rate, the number of adverse outcomes selected for observation and the acceptable false alarm rate. This technique has several advantages compared with other currently used methods. From a public health point of view, two important factors are to be considered in setting the parameters of the test: the delay in providing an answer for the community and the availability of resources for conducting environmental investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-837
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Observation
Incidence

Cite this

@article{3c1c38a997bf44cdb6e53a28aba21151,
title = "A method for the follow-up of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes",
abstract = "Clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes are reported with increasing frequency to public health authorities. Most are random events and only a very small proportion is likely due to identifiable environmental agents. Often, a preliminary study confirms the existence of a spatial and temporal excess but no biologically plausible cause is found. These cases require a follow-up of incidence to identify any continuing excess. A conceptually simple 'fixed window' technique of follow up is proposed. The power of the test is mainly influenced by the magnitude of the increase in rate, the number of adverse outcomes selected for observation and the acceptable false alarm rate. This technique has several advantages compared with other currently used methods. From a public health point of view, two important factors are to be considered in setting the parameters of the test: the delay in providing an answer for the community and the availability of resources for conducting environmental investigations.",
keywords = "Cluster, Congenital anomaly, Investigation, Monitoring, Statistical method",
author = "Th{\'e}ophile Niyonsenga and {De Wals}, Philippe",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1023/A:1007517830120",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "833--837",
journal = "European Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0393-2990",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "9",

}

A method for the follow-up of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes. / Niyonsenga, Théophile; De Wals, Philippe.

In: European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 15, No. 9, 15.12.1999, p. 833-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for the follow-up of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes

AU - Niyonsenga, Théophile

AU - De Wals, Philippe

PY - 1999/12/15

Y1 - 1999/12/15

N2 - Clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes are reported with increasing frequency to public health authorities. Most are random events and only a very small proportion is likely due to identifiable environmental agents. Often, a preliminary study confirms the existence of a spatial and temporal excess but no biologically plausible cause is found. These cases require a follow-up of incidence to identify any continuing excess. A conceptually simple 'fixed window' technique of follow up is proposed. The power of the test is mainly influenced by the magnitude of the increase in rate, the number of adverse outcomes selected for observation and the acceptable false alarm rate. This technique has several advantages compared with other currently used methods. From a public health point of view, two important factors are to be considered in setting the parameters of the test: the delay in providing an answer for the community and the availability of resources for conducting environmental investigations.

AB - Clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes are reported with increasing frequency to public health authorities. Most are random events and only a very small proportion is likely due to identifiable environmental agents. Often, a preliminary study confirms the existence of a spatial and temporal excess but no biologically plausible cause is found. These cases require a follow-up of incidence to identify any continuing excess. A conceptually simple 'fixed window' technique of follow up is proposed. The power of the test is mainly influenced by the magnitude of the increase in rate, the number of adverse outcomes selected for observation and the acceptable false alarm rate. This technique has several advantages compared with other currently used methods. From a public health point of view, two important factors are to be considered in setting the parameters of the test: the delay in providing an answer for the community and the availability of resources for conducting environmental investigations.

KW - Cluster

KW - Congenital anomaly

KW - Investigation

KW - Monitoring

KW - Statistical method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032727011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1007517830120

DO - 10.1023/A:1007517830120

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 833

EP - 837

JO - European Journal of Epidemiology

JF - European Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0393-2990

IS - 9

ER -