A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research

Marjorie Atchan, Deborah Davis, Maralyn Foureur

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM To explore the use and application of case study research in midwifery. BACKGROUND Case study research provides rich data for the analysis of complex issues and interventions in the healthcare disciplines; however, a gap in the midwifery research literature was identified. DESIGN A methodological review of midwifery case study research using recognized templates, frameworks and reporting guidelines facilitated comprehensive analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic database search using the date range January 2005-December 2014: Maternal and Infant Care, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete, Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, Medline, Health Collection (Informit), Cochrane Library Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Wiley online and ProQuest Central. REVIEW METHODS Narrative evaluation was undertaken. Clearly worded questions reflected the problem and purpose. The application, strengths and limitations of case study methods were identified through a quality appraisal process. RESULTS The review identified both case study research's applicability to midwifery and its low uptake, especially in clinical studies. Many papers included the necessary criteria to achieve rigour. The included measures of authenticity and methodology were varied. A high standard of authenticity was observed, suggesting authors considered these elements to be routine inclusions. Technical aspects were lacking in many papers, namely a lack of reflexivity and incomplete transparency of processes. CONCLUSION This review raises the profile of case study research in midwifery. Midwives will be encouraged to explore if case study research is suitable for their investigation. The raised profile will demonstrate further applicability; encourage support and wider adoption in the midwifery setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2259-2271
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume72
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Research
Infant Care
Health
Libraries
Nursing
Mothers
Databases
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{7b82bb582f1741a88439f4717f4206a6,
title = "A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research",
abstract = "AIM To explore the use and application of case study research in midwifery. BACKGROUND Case study research provides rich data for the analysis of complex issues and interventions in the healthcare disciplines; however, a gap in the midwifery research literature was identified. DESIGN A methodological review of midwifery case study research using recognized templates, frameworks and reporting guidelines facilitated comprehensive analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic database search using the date range January 2005-December 2014: Maternal and Infant Care, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete, Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, Medline, Health Collection (Informit), Cochrane Library Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Wiley online and ProQuest Central. REVIEW METHODS Narrative evaluation was undertaken. Clearly worded questions reflected the problem and purpose. The application, strengths and limitations of case study methods were identified through a quality appraisal process. RESULTS The review identified both case study research's applicability to midwifery and its low uptake, especially in clinical studies. Many papers included the necessary criteria to achieve rigour. The included measures of authenticity and methodology were varied. A high standard of authenticity was observed, suggesting authors considered these elements to be routine inclusions. Technical aspects were lacking in many papers, namely a lack of reflexivity and incomplete transparency of processes. CONCLUSION This review raises the profile of case study research in midwifery. Midwives will be encouraged to explore if case study research is suitable for their investigation. The raised profile will demonstrate further applicability; encourage support and wider adoption in the midwifery setting.",
keywords = "case study research, maternity, methodological review, methodology, midwifery, midwives, qualitative research, Pregnancy, Humans, Midwifery, Female, Qualitative Research",
author = "Marjorie Atchan and Deborah Davis and Maralyn Foureur",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/jan.12946",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "2259--2271",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research. / Atchan, Marjorie; Davis, Deborah; Foureur, Maralyn.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 72, No. 10, 2016, p. 2259-2271.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research

AU - Atchan, Marjorie

AU - Davis, Deborah

AU - Foureur, Maralyn

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - AIM To explore the use and application of case study research in midwifery. BACKGROUND Case study research provides rich data for the analysis of complex issues and interventions in the healthcare disciplines; however, a gap in the midwifery research literature was identified. DESIGN A methodological review of midwifery case study research using recognized templates, frameworks and reporting guidelines facilitated comprehensive analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic database search using the date range January 2005-December 2014: Maternal and Infant Care, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete, Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, Medline, Health Collection (Informit), Cochrane Library Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Wiley online and ProQuest Central. REVIEW METHODS Narrative evaluation was undertaken. Clearly worded questions reflected the problem and purpose. The application, strengths and limitations of case study methods were identified through a quality appraisal process. RESULTS The review identified both case study research's applicability to midwifery and its low uptake, especially in clinical studies. Many papers included the necessary criteria to achieve rigour. The included measures of authenticity and methodology were varied. A high standard of authenticity was observed, suggesting authors considered these elements to be routine inclusions. Technical aspects were lacking in many papers, namely a lack of reflexivity and incomplete transparency of processes. CONCLUSION This review raises the profile of case study research in midwifery. Midwives will be encouraged to explore if case study research is suitable for their investigation. The raised profile will demonstrate further applicability; encourage support and wider adoption in the midwifery setting.

AB - AIM To explore the use and application of case study research in midwifery. BACKGROUND Case study research provides rich data for the analysis of complex issues and interventions in the healthcare disciplines; however, a gap in the midwifery research literature was identified. DESIGN A methodological review of midwifery case study research using recognized templates, frameworks and reporting guidelines facilitated comprehensive analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic database search using the date range January 2005-December 2014: Maternal and Infant Care, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete, Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, Medline, Health Collection (Informit), Cochrane Library Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Wiley online and ProQuest Central. REVIEW METHODS Narrative evaluation was undertaken. Clearly worded questions reflected the problem and purpose. The application, strengths and limitations of case study methods were identified through a quality appraisal process. RESULTS The review identified both case study research's applicability to midwifery and its low uptake, especially in clinical studies. Many papers included the necessary criteria to achieve rigour. The included measures of authenticity and methodology were varied. A high standard of authenticity was observed, suggesting authors considered these elements to be routine inclusions. Technical aspects were lacking in many papers, namely a lack of reflexivity and incomplete transparency of processes. CONCLUSION This review raises the profile of case study research in midwifery. Midwives will be encouraged to explore if case study research is suitable for their investigation. The raised profile will demonstrate further applicability; encourage support and wider adoption in the midwifery setting.

KW - case study research

KW - maternity

KW - methodological review

KW - methodology

KW - midwifery

KW - midwives

KW - qualitative research

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Humans

KW - Midwifery

KW - Female

KW - Qualitative Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027946476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/methodological-review-qualitative-case-study-methodology-midwifery-research

U2 - 10.1111/jan.12946

DO - 10.1111/jan.12946

M3 - Review article

VL - 72

SP - 2259

EP - 2271

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 10

ER -