TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multidimensional Dynamic Measure of Child Disadvantage
T2 - A Methodological Tool for Policymakers
AU - Mishra, Ankita
AU - Ray, Ranjan
AU - Risse, Leonora
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This paper uses unit-record data from ‘Growing Up in Australia’ (the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children conducted in partnership between the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)) and from ‘Footprints in Time’ (the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children which was initiated and is funded and managed by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS)). The findings and views presented in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the DSS, the AIFS, the ABS, nor the Indigenous people and their communities involved in the study. Helpful comments from two anonymous referees, and from seminar participants in several presentations of earlier versions of the paper, are gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - This paper demonstrates the applicability of an innovative approach towards examining child disadvantage, using a holistic, dynamic measure that not only accounts for multiple sources of disadvantage but also for the recurrence and persistence of disadvantage throughout a child’s life. We analyse child disadvantage using two longitudinal surveys of the Australian child population, one of which is specific to Indigenous children, who experience notably higher rates of disadvantage. Among Australian children, we detect that poor body weight and bullying—representative of the broad dimensions of health and emotional wellbeing—should be of significant concern to policymakers. Among Indigenous children, housing conditions, schooling and exposure to risky behaviours stand out as areas of concern. By identifying the dimensions in which rates of child disadvantage are most severe, this methodological approach can help steer targeted policy actions.
AB - This paper demonstrates the applicability of an innovative approach towards examining child disadvantage, using a holistic, dynamic measure that not only accounts for multiple sources of disadvantage but also for the recurrence and persistence of disadvantage throughout a child’s life. We analyse child disadvantage using two longitudinal surveys of the Australian child population, one of which is specific to Indigenous children, who experience notably higher rates of disadvantage. Among Australian children, we detect that poor body weight and bullying—representative of the broad dimensions of health and emotional wellbeing—should be of significant concern to policymakers. Among Indigenous children, housing conditions, schooling and exposure to risky behaviours stand out as areas of concern. By identifying the dimensions in which rates of child disadvantage are most severe, this methodological approach can help steer targeted policy actions.
KW - Child disadvantage
KW - Indigenous children
KW - Longitudinal study
KW - Multidimensional deprivation
KW - Persistence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028841317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11205-017-1742-x
DO - 10.1007/s11205-017-1742-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028841317
SN - 0303-8300
VL - 139
SP - 1187
EP - 1218
JO - Social Indicators Research
JF - Social Indicators Research
IS - 3
ER -