A note on communicating environmental change for non-market valuation

Baihua Fu, Fiona DYER, Alexey Kravchenko, Brenda DYACK, Wendy Merritt, Riccardo Scarpa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Communicating change in environmental condition is a critical component of non-market valuation studies. However, the underlying assumptions and implications associated with alternative ways of expressing change in environmental condition for surveys are rarely discussed in the literature. Our review found no cases where alternative formulations were both discussed and tested. In this note we report on our multi-disciplinary analysis of how best to express such change. We interrogate the meaning of, and inferences from, four formulations for quantitative expressions, or metrics, of environmental indicators that are used in the field of ecology and we then evaluate their usefulness in non-market valuation. The assumptions and limitations of each formulation are discussed using seven hypothetical cases of change in environmental condition. We show that formulations for expressing change can be grouped based on two inherent philosophies potentially held by people when they consider their preferences for environmental changes: ‘more is better philosophy’ and ‘restoration philosophy’. We contend that, without careful consideration of which philosophy people may apply, it is possible to inadvertently bias respondent choices when a particular formulation is used in a valuation study. If this happens, resulting value estimates will be a poor reflection of what researchers seek. An alternative approach that does not presuppose a philosophy but instead helps reveal a respondent's philosophy, is proposed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-172
Number of pages8
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume72
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

valuation
environmental change
environmental conditions
environmental factors
environmental indicators
environmental indicator
Non-market valuation
Environmental change
researchers
ecology
Environmental conditions

Cite this

Fu, Baihua ; DYER, Fiona ; Kravchenko, Alexey ; DYACK, Brenda ; Merritt, Wendy ; Scarpa, Riccardo. / A note on communicating environmental change for non-market valuation. In: Ecological Indicators. 2017 ; Vol. 72. pp. 165-172.
@article{1483203759a14b68afdbeb97b1b1a338,
title = "A note on communicating environmental change for non-market valuation",
abstract = "Communicating change in environmental condition is a critical component of non-market valuation studies. However, the underlying assumptions and implications associated with alternative ways of expressing change in environmental condition for surveys are rarely discussed in the literature. Our review found no cases where alternative formulations were both discussed and tested. In this note we report on our multi-disciplinary analysis of how best to express such change. We interrogate the meaning of, and inferences from, four formulations for quantitative expressions, or metrics, of environmental indicators that are used in the field of ecology and we then evaluate their usefulness in non-market valuation. The assumptions and limitations of each formulation are discussed using seven hypothetical cases of change in environmental condition. We show that formulations for expressing change can be grouped based on two inherent philosophies potentially held by people when they consider their preferences for environmental changes: ‘more is better philosophy’ and ‘restoration philosophy’. We contend that, without careful consideration of which philosophy people may apply, it is possible to inadvertently bias respondent choices when a particular formulation is used in a valuation study. If this happens, resulting value estimates will be a poor reflection of what researchers seek. An alternative approach that does not presuppose a philosophy but instead helps reveal a respondent's philosophy, is proposed.",
keywords = "Ecological change, Environmental indicators, Environmental metric, Environmental valuation, Formulation, Non-market valuation",
author = "Baihua Fu and Fiona DYER and Alexey Kravchenko and Brenda DYACK and Wendy Merritt and Riccardo Scarpa",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.018",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "165--172",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A note on communicating environmental change for non-market valuation. / Fu, Baihua; DYER, Fiona; Kravchenko, Alexey; DYACK, Brenda; Merritt, Wendy; Scarpa, Riccardo.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 72, 01.2017, p. 165-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on communicating environmental change for non-market valuation

AU - Fu, Baihua

AU - DYER, Fiona

AU - Kravchenko, Alexey

AU - DYACK, Brenda

AU - Merritt, Wendy

AU - Scarpa, Riccardo

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Communicating change in environmental condition is a critical component of non-market valuation studies. However, the underlying assumptions and implications associated with alternative ways of expressing change in environmental condition for surveys are rarely discussed in the literature. Our review found no cases where alternative formulations were both discussed and tested. In this note we report on our multi-disciplinary analysis of how best to express such change. We interrogate the meaning of, and inferences from, four formulations for quantitative expressions, or metrics, of environmental indicators that are used in the field of ecology and we then evaluate their usefulness in non-market valuation. The assumptions and limitations of each formulation are discussed using seven hypothetical cases of change in environmental condition. We show that formulations for expressing change can be grouped based on two inherent philosophies potentially held by people when they consider their preferences for environmental changes: ‘more is better philosophy’ and ‘restoration philosophy’. We contend that, without careful consideration of which philosophy people may apply, it is possible to inadvertently bias respondent choices when a particular formulation is used in a valuation study. If this happens, resulting value estimates will be a poor reflection of what researchers seek. An alternative approach that does not presuppose a philosophy but instead helps reveal a respondent's philosophy, is proposed.

AB - Communicating change in environmental condition is a critical component of non-market valuation studies. However, the underlying assumptions and implications associated with alternative ways of expressing change in environmental condition for surveys are rarely discussed in the literature. Our review found no cases where alternative formulations were both discussed and tested. In this note we report on our multi-disciplinary analysis of how best to express such change. We interrogate the meaning of, and inferences from, four formulations for quantitative expressions, or metrics, of environmental indicators that are used in the field of ecology and we then evaluate their usefulness in non-market valuation. The assumptions and limitations of each formulation are discussed using seven hypothetical cases of change in environmental condition. We show that formulations for expressing change can be grouped based on two inherent philosophies potentially held by people when they consider their preferences for environmental changes: ‘more is better philosophy’ and ‘restoration philosophy’. We contend that, without careful consideration of which philosophy people may apply, it is possible to inadvertently bias respondent choices when a particular formulation is used in a valuation study. If this happens, resulting value estimates will be a poor reflection of what researchers seek. An alternative approach that does not presuppose a philosophy but instead helps reveal a respondent's philosophy, is proposed.

KW - Ecological change

KW - Environmental indicators

KW - Environmental metric

KW - Environmental valuation

KW - Formulation

KW - Non-market valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989875496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/note-communicating-environmental-change-nonmarket-valuation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.018

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 165

EP - 172

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -