A novel framework for disentangling the scale-dependent influences of abiotic factors on alpine treeline position

Bradley Case, Richard DUNCAN

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Low-temperature growth limitation largely determines alpine treeline position globally, but treeline elevation also varies locally at a range of scales in response to multiple biotic and abiotic factors. In this study, we conceptualise how variability in treeline elevation is related to abiotic factors that act as thermal modifiers, physiological stressors, or disturbance agents. We then present a novel analytical framework for quantifying how abiotic factors influence treeline elevation at different spatial scales using New Zealand Nothofagus treelines as a case study. We delineated Nothofagus treelines in a GIS, along which we extracted data for treeline elevation and eight abiotic explanatory variables at 54 000 points. Each location was classified at each of five spatial scales based on nested river catchments, ranging from large regional to small hillslope catchments. We used hierarchical linear models to partition the variation in both treeline elevation and the eight abiotic variables by spatial scale, and then quantified the relationships between these at each spatial scale in turn. Nothofagus treeline elevation varied from 800–1740 m a.s.l. across New Zealand. Abiotic factors explained 82% of the variation in treeline elevation at the largest (regional) scale and 44–52% of variation at the four finer scales. Broad-scale variation in Nothofagus treeline elevation was strongly associated with thermal modifiers, consistent with the idea that treelines coincide with a temperature-driven, physiological limit. However, much of the finer-scale variation in treeline elevation was explained by a combination of thermal, physiological stress-related, and disturbance variables operating at different spatial scales. The conceptual model and analytical methods developed here provide a general framework for understanding treeline variation at different spatial scales.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)838-851
    Number of pages14
    JournalEcography
    Volume37
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    treeline
    environmental factors
    Nothofagus
    abiotic factor
    heat
    catchment
    disturbance
    biotic factor
    analytical framework
    hillslope
    analytical methods
    analytical method

    Cite this

    @article{fb3549ec92cf48cc8c47ec6545c43bda,
    title = "A novel framework for disentangling the scale-dependent influences of abiotic factors on alpine treeline position",
    abstract = "Low-temperature growth limitation largely determines alpine treeline position globally, but treeline elevation also varies locally at a range of scales in response to multiple biotic and abiotic factors. In this study, we conceptualise how variability in treeline elevation is related to abiotic factors that act as thermal modifiers, physiological stressors, or disturbance agents. We then present a novel analytical framework for quantifying how abiotic factors influence treeline elevation at different spatial scales using New Zealand Nothofagus treelines as a case study. We delineated Nothofagus treelines in a GIS, along which we extracted data for treeline elevation and eight abiotic explanatory variables at 54 000 points. Each location was classified at each of five spatial scales based on nested river catchments, ranging from large regional to small hillslope catchments. We used hierarchical linear models to partition the variation in both treeline elevation and the eight abiotic variables by spatial scale, and then quantified the relationships between these at each spatial scale in turn. Nothofagus treeline elevation varied from 800–1740 m a.s.l. across New Zealand. Abiotic factors explained 82{\%} of the variation in treeline elevation at the largest (regional) scale and 44–52{\%} of variation at the four finer scales. Broad-scale variation in Nothofagus treeline elevation was strongly associated with thermal modifiers, consistent with the idea that treelines coincide with a temperature-driven, physiological limit. However, much of the finer-scale variation in treeline elevation was explained by a combination of thermal, physiological stress-related, and disturbance variables operating at different spatial scales. The conceptual model and analytical methods developed here provide a general framework for understanding treeline variation at different spatial scales.",
    author = "Bradley Case and Richard DUNCAN",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1111/ecog.00280",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "838--851",
    journal = "Ecography",
    issn = "0906-7590",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "9",

    }

    A novel framework for disentangling the scale-dependent influences of abiotic factors on alpine treeline position. / Case, Bradley; DUNCAN, Richard.

    In: Ecography, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2014, p. 838-851.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A novel framework for disentangling the scale-dependent influences of abiotic factors on alpine treeline position

    AU - Case, Bradley

    AU - DUNCAN, Richard

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Low-temperature growth limitation largely determines alpine treeline position globally, but treeline elevation also varies locally at a range of scales in response to multiple biotic and abiotic factors. In this study, we conceptualise how variability in treeline elevation is related to abiotic factors that act as thermal modifiers, physiological stressors, or disturbance agents. We then present a novel analytical framework for quantifying how abiotic factors influence treeline elevation at different spatial scales using New Zealand Nothofagus treelines as a case study. We delineated Nothofagus treelines in a GIS, along which we extracted data for treeline elevation and eight abiotic explanatory variables at 54 000 points. Each location was classified at each of five spatial scales based on nested river catchments, ranging from large regional to small hillslope catchments. We used hierarchical linear models to partition the variation in both treeline elevation and the eight abiotic variables by spatial scale, and then quantified the relationships between these at each spatial scale in turn. Nothofagus treeline elevation varied from 800–1740 m a.s.l. across New Zealand. Abiotic factors explained 82% of the variation in treeline elevation at the largest (regional) scale and 44–52% of variation at the four finer scales. Broad-scale variation in Nothofagus treeline elevation was strongly associated with thermal modifiers, consistent with the idea that treelines coincide with a temperature-driven, physiological limit. However, much of the finer-scale variation in treeline elevation was explained by a combination of thermal, physiological stress-related, and disturbance variables operating at different spatial scales. The conceptual model and analytical methods developed here provide a general framework for understanding treeline variation at different spatial scales.

    AB - Low-temperature growth limitation largely determines alpine treeline position globally, but treeline elevation also varies locally at a range of scales in response to multiple biotic and abiotic factors. In this study, we conceptualise how variability in treeline elevation is related to abiotic factors that act as thermal modifiers, physiological stressors, or disturbance agents. We then present a novel analytical framework for quantifying how abiotic factors influence treeline elevation at different spatial scales using New Zealand Nothofagus treelines as a case study. We delineated Nothofagus treelines in a GIS, along which we extracted data for treeline elevation and eight abiotic explanatory variables at 54 000 points. Each location was classified at each of five spatial scales based on nested river catchments, ranging from large regional to small hillslope catchments. We used hierarchical linear models to partition the variation in both treeline elevation and the eight abiotic variables by spatial scale, and then quantified the relationships between these at each spatial scale in turn. Nothofagus treeline elevation varied from 800–1740 m a.s.l. across New Zealand. Abiotic factors explained 82% of the variation in treeline elevation at the largest (regional) scale and 44–52% of variation at the four finer scales. Broad-scale variation in Nothofagus treeline elevation was strongly associated with thermal modifiers, consistent with the idea that treelines coincide with a temperature-driven, physiological limit. However, much of the finer-scale variation in treeline elevation was explained by a combination of thermal, physiological stress-related, and disturbance variables operating at different spatial scales. The conceptual model and analytical methods developed here provide a general framework for understanding treeline variation at different spatial scales.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906794156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/novel-framework-disentangling-scaledependent-influences-abiotic-factors-alpine-treeline-position

    U2 - 10.1111/ecog.00280

    DO - 10.1111/ecog.00280

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 838

    EP - 851

    JO - Ecography

    JF - Ecography

    SN - 0906-7590

    IS - 9

    ER -