A predictive coding perspective on autism spectrum disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent article entitled “When the world becomes ‘too real’: Bayesian explanation of autistic perception,” Elizabeth Pellicano and David Burr (Pellicano and Burr, 2012b) introduce an intriguing new hypothesis, a Bayesian account, concerning the possible origins of perceptual deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This Bayesian account explains why ASD impacts perception in systematic ways, but it does not clearly explain how. Most prominently, the Bayesian account lacks connections to the neural computation performed by the brain, and does not provide mechanistic explanations for ASD (Rust and Stocker, 2010; Colombo and Series, 2012). Nor does the Bayesian account explain what the biological origin is of the “prior”—the essential addition of the Bayesian models. In Marr's terminology (Marr, 1982), Pellicano and Burr paper proposes a computational-level explanation for ASD, but not an account for the other two levels, representation and implementation. We propose that a predictive coding framework (schematized in Figure 1) may fill the gap and generate a testable framework open to further experimental investigations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number19
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume4
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminology
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Brain

Cite this

@article{bc94003b2f5d4b10824a21b05b42ab7e,
title = "A predictive coding perspective on autism spectrum disorders",
abstract = "In a recent article entitled “When the world becomes ‘too real’: Bayesian explanation of autistic perception,” Elizabeth Pellicano and David Burr (Pellicano and Burr, 2012b) introduce an intriguing new hypothesis, a Bayesian account, concerning the possible origins of perceptual deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This Bayesian account explains why ASD impacts perception in systematic ways, but it does not clearly explain how. Most prominently, the Bayesian account lacks connections to the neural computation performed by the brain, and does not provide mechanistic explanations for ASD (Rust and Stocker, 2010; Colombo and Series, 2012). Nor does the Bayesian account explain what the biological origin is of the “prior”—the essential addition of the Bayesian models. In Marr's terminology (Marr, 1982), Pellicano and Burr paper proposes a computational-level explanation for ASD, but not an account for the other two levels, representation and implementation. We propose that a predictive coding framework (schematized in Figure 1) may fill the gap and generate a testable framework open to further experimental investigations.",
author = "{van Boxtel}, {Jeroen J A} and Hongjing Lu",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00019",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "JAN",

}

A predictive coding perspective on autism spectrum disorders. / van Boxtel, Jeroen J A; Lu, Hongjing.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 4, No. JAN, 19, 12.03.2013, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - A predictive coding perspective on autism spectrum disorders

AU - van Boxtel, Jeroen J A

AU - Lu, Hongjing

PY - 2013/3/12

Y1 - 2013/3/12

N2 - In a recent article entitled “When the world becomes ‘too real’: Bayesian explanation of autistic perception,” Elizabeth Pellicano and David Burr (Pellicano and Burr, 2012b) introduce an intriguing new hypothesis, a Bayesian account, concerning the possible origins of perceptual deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This Bayesian account explains why ASD impacts perception in systematic ways, but it does not clearly explain how. Most prominently, the Bayesian account lacks connections to the neural computation performed by the brain, and does not provide mechanistic explanations for ASD (Rust and Stocker, 2010; Colombo and Series, 2012). Nor does the Bayesian account explain what the biological origin is of the “prior”—the essential addition of the Bayesian models. In Marr's terminology (Marr, 1982), Pellicano and Burr paper proposes a computational-level explanation for ASD, but not an account for the other two levels, representation and implementation. We propose that a predictive coding framework (schematized in Figure 1) may fill the gap and generate a testable framework open to further experimental investigations.

AB - In a recent article entitled “When the world becomes ‘too real’: Bayesian explanation of autistic perception,” Elizabeth Pellicano and David Burr (Pellicano and Burr, 2012b) introduce an intriguing new hypothesis, a Bayesian account, concerning the possible origins of perceptual deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This Bayesian account explains why ASD impacts perception in systematic ways, but it does not clearly explain how. Most prominently, the Bayesian account lacks connections to the neural computation performed by the brain, and does not provide mechanistic explanations for ASD (Rust and Stocker, 2010; Colombo and Series, 2012). Nor does the Bayesian account explain what the biological origin is of the “prior”—the essential addition of the Bayesian models. In Marr's terminology (Marr, 1982), Pellicano and Burr paper proposes a computational-level explanation for ASD, but not an account for the other two levels, representation and implementation. We propose that a predictive coding framework (schematized in Figure 1) may fill the gap and generate a testable framework open to further experimental investigations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874693831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00019

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00019

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - JAN

M1 - 19

ER -