A prospective evaluation of contingent loans as a means of financing wild dog exclusion fences

Geoff Cockfield, Linda Courtenay Botterill, Simon Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Invasive species, such as wild dogs can be considered an externality arising from the activities of pastoral enterprises, with producers having limited responsibility for the problem and limited capacity to mitigate it. There are therefore arguments for government intervention through encouraging both individual and collective control measures. Governments are however increasingly inclined to ensure recipients of support make some contribution where there are private benefits. An example of this, in Australia, is the requirement that students repay some of the cost of their tertiary education. Using the issue of wild dog exclusion fencing in south-west Queensland as a case study, this paper considers if and how a policy instrument adopted for higher education (HECS-HELP), contingent loans, could be adapted to address problems of externalities in rural Australia. Central to the issue of exclusion fences are high upfront costs and highly variable incomes that limit the ability to recoup those costs according to a predictable timeline. Considering a range of incomes and a variety of private/government shares of the cost of the fences, we examine the effects of revenue contingent loans for the construction of these fences, using model farms developed from survey data for farm businesses in south-west Queensland. We find that contingent loans could mitigate the hardship effects of additional debt and variable incomes. Businesses with smaller properties and relatively lower incomes may however struggle to pay back larger loans. Using south-west Queensland as a case study, we show how different shares of contributions change the time to pay back loans, outline how a contingent loan scheme might be administered and note some issues with integrating personal contingent loans into a collective fence arrangement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-601
Number of pages11
JournalRangeland Journal
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

loans
fences
funding
income
dogs
cost
Queensland
farm
higher education
debt
invasive species
student
case studies
education
farms
dog
financing
evaluation
control methods
students

Cite this

@article{366892b1aaa744cc8130f93e44c95522,
title = "A prospective evaluation of contingent loans as a means of financing wild dog exclusion fences",
abstract = "Invasive species, such as wild dogs can be considered an externality arising from the activities of pastoral enterprises, with producers having limited responsibility for the problem and limited capacity to mitigate it. There are therefore arguments for government intervention through encouraging both individual and collective control measures. Governments are however increasingly inclined to ensure recipients of support make some contribution where there are private benefits. An example of this, in Australia, is the requirement that students repay some of the cost of their tertiary education. Using the issue of wild dog exclusion fencing in south-west Queensland as a case study, this paper considers if and how a policy instrument adopted for higher education (HECS-HELP), contingent loans, could be adapted to address problems of externalities in rural Australia. Central to the issue of exclusion fences are high upfront costs and highly variable incomes that limit the ability to recoup those costs according to a predictable timeline. Considering a range of incomes and a variety of private/government shares of the cost of the fences, we examine the effects of revenue contingent loans for the construction of these fences, using model farms developed from survey data for farm businesses in south-west Queensland. We find that contingent loans could mitigate the hardship effects of additional debt and variable incomes. Businesses with smaller properties and relatively lower incomes may however struggle to pay back larger loans. Using south-west Queensland as a case study, we show how different shares of contributions change the time to pay back loans, outline how a contingent loan scheme might be administered and note some issues with integrating personal contingent loans into a collective fence arrangement.",
keywords = "collective action, predation on livestock, public benefit, rangelands grazing",
author = "Geoff Cockfield and Botterill, {Linda Courtenay} and Simon Kelly",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1071/RJ18054",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "591--601",
journal = "Rangeland Journal",
issn = "1036-9872",
publisher = "Australian Rangeland Society",
number = "6",

}

A prospective evaluation of contingent loans as a means of financing wild dog exclusion fences. / Cockfield, Geoff; Botterill, Linda Courtenay; Kelly, Simon.

In: Rangeland Journal, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2018, p. 591-601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective evaluation of contingent loans as a means of financing wild dog exclusion fences

AU - Cockfield, Geoff

AU - Botterill, Linda Courtenay

AU - Kelly, Simon

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Invasive species, such as wild dogs can be considered an externality arising from the activities of pastoral enterprises, with producers having limited responsibility for the problem and limited capacity to mitigate it. There are therefore arguments for government intervention through encouraging both individual and collective control measures. Governments are however increasingly inclined to ensure recipients of support make some contribution where there are private benefits. An example of this, in Australia, is the requirement that students repay some of the cost of their tertiary education. Using the issue of wild dog exclusion fencing in south-west Queensland as a case study, this paper considers if and how a policy instrument adopted for higher education (HECS-HELP), contingent loans, could be adapted to address problems of externalities in rural Australia. Central to the issue of exclusion fences are high upfront costs and highly variable incomes that limit the ability to recoup those costs according to a predictable timeline. Considering a range of incomes and a variety of private/government shares of the cost of the fences, we examine the effects of revenue contingent loans for the construction of these fences, using model farms developed from survey data for farm businesses in south-west Queensland. We find that contingent loans could mitigate the hardship effects of additional debt and variable incomes. Businesses with smaller properties and relatively lower incomes may however struggle to pay back larger loans. Using south-west Queensland as a case study, we show how different shares of contributions change the time to pay back loans, outline how a contingent loan scheme might be administered and note some issues with integrating personal contingent loans into a collective fence arrangement.

AB - Invasive species, such as wild dogs can be considered an externality arising from the activities of pastoral enterprises, with producers having limited responsibility for the problem and limited capacity to mitigate it. There are therefore arguments for government intervention through encouraging both individual and collective control measures. Governments are however increasingly inclined to ensure recipients of support make some contribution where there are private benefits. An example of this, in Australia, is the requirement that students repay some of the cost of their tertiary education. Using the issue of wild dog exclusion fencing in south-west Queensland as a case study, this paper considers if and how a policy instrument adopted for higher education (HECS-HELP), contingent loans, could be adapted to address problems of externalities in rural Australia. Central to the issue of exclusion fences are high upfront costs and highly variable incomes that limit the ability to recoup those costs according to a predictable timeline. Considering a range of incomes and a variety of private/government shares of the cost of the fences, we examine the effects of revenue contingent loans for the construction of these fences, using model farms developed from survey data for farm businesses in south-west Queensland. We find that contingent loans could mitigate the hardship effects of additional debt and variable incomes. Businesses with smaller properties and relatively lower incomes may however struggle to pay back larger loans. Using south-west Queensland as a case study, we show how different shares of contributions change the time to pay back loans, outline how a contingent loan scheme might be administered and note some issues with integrating personal contingent loans into a collective fence arrangement.

KW - collective action

KW - predation on livestock

KW - public benefit

KW - rangelands grazing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056362755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/prospective-evaluation-contingent-loans-means-financing-wild-dog-exclusion-fences

U2 - 10.1071/RJ18054

DO - 10.1071/RJ18054

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 591

EP - 601

JO - Rangeland Journal

JF - Rangeland Journal

SN - 1036-9872

IS - 6

ER -