A review of impurity profiling and synthetic route of manufacture of methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylene

Natasha Stojanovska, Shanlin Fu, Mark Tahtouh, Tamsin KELLY, Alison Beavis, Paul Kirkbride

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Amphetamine-type substances (ATS), like other synthetically derived compounds, can be produced by a multitude of synthetic pathways using a variety of precursors and reagents, resulting in a large number of possible contaminants (by-products, intermediates and impurities). This review article describes the common contaminants found in preparations of methylamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine (AP), N,N-dimethylamphetamine (DMA) and p-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) synthesised via common synthetic pathways including reductive amination, Leuckart method, Nagai method, Emde method, Birch reduction, “Moscow” method, Wacker process, “Nitrostyrene” method and the Peracid oxidation method.

Contaminants can facilitate identification of the synthetic route, origin of precursors and may suggest information as to the location of manufacture of these illicit drugs. Contaminant profiling can provide vital intelligence for investigations in which linking seizures or identifying the synthetic pathway is essential. This review article presents an accessible resource; a compilation of contaminants resulting from a variety of manufacturing methods used to synthesise the most common ATS. It is important for research in this field to continue as valuable information can be extracted from illicit drug samples, increasing discrimination amongst ATS, and in turn, leading to an increase in evidential value and forensic drug intelligence from forensic drug samples
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-26
Number of pages19
JournalForensic Science International
Volume224
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Amphetamine
Street Drugs
Intelligence
Amination
Betula
Moscow
3-methylamphetamine
1-(4-methylphenyl)propane-2-amine
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Seizures
Research

Cite this

Stojanovska, Natasha ; Fu, Shanlin ; Tahtouh, Mark ; KELLY, Tamsin ; Beavis, Alison ; Kirkbride, Paul. / A review of impurity profiling and synthetic route of manufacture of methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylene. In: Forensic Science International. 2013 ; Vol. 224, No. 1-3. pp. 8-26.
@article{e960c97aeb1f4473bbfdb87077805b6d,
title = "A review of impurity profiling and synthetic route of manufacture of methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylene",
abstract = "Amphetamine-type substances (ATS), like other synthetically derived compounds, can be produced by a multitude of synthetic pathways using a variety of precursors and reagents, resulting in a large number of possible contaminants (by-products, intermediates and impurities). This review article describes the common contaminants found in preparations of methylamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine (AP), N,N-dimethylamphetamine (DMA) and p-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) synthesised via common synthetic pathways including reductive amination, Leuckart method, Nagai method, Emde method, Birch reduction, “Moscow” method, Wacker process, “Nitrostyrene” method and the Peracid oxidation method.Contaminants can facilitate identification of the synthetic route, origin of precursors and may suggest information as to the location of manufacture of these illicit drugs. Contaminant profiling can provide vital intelligence for investigations in which linking seizures or identifying the synthetic pathway is essential. This review article presents an accessible resource; a compilation of contaminants resulting from a variety of manufacturing methods used to synthesise the most common ATS. It is important for research in this field to continue as valuable information can be extracted from illicit drug samples, increasing discrimination amongst ATS, and in turn, leading to an increase in evidential value and forensic drug intelligence from forensic drug samples",
keywords = "Methylamphetamine, Impurity profiling, 3, 4-methylenedioxymethlamphetamine",
author = "Natasha Stojanovska and Shanlin Fu and Mark Tahtouh and Tamsin KELLY and Alison Beavis and Paul Kirkbride",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.040",
language = "English",
volume = "224",
pages = "8--26",
journal = "Forensic Science",
issn = "0379-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1-3",

}

A review of impurity profiling and synthetic route of manufacture of methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylene. / Stojanovska, Natasha; Fu, Shanlin; Tahtouh, Mark; KELLY, Tamsin; Beavis, Alison; Kirkbride, Paul.

In: Forensic Science International, Vol. 224, No. 1-3, 2013, p. 8-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of impurity profiling and synthetic route of manufacture of methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylene

AU - Stojanovska, Natasha

AU - Fu, Shanlin

AU - Tahtouh, Mark

AU - KELLY, Tamsin

AU - Beavis, Alison

AU - Kirkbride, Paul

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Amphetamine-type substances (ATS), like other synthetically derived compounds, can be produced by a multitude of synthetic pathways using a variety of precursors and reagents, resulting in a large number of possible contaminants (by-products, intermediates and impurities). This review article describes the common contaminants found in preparations of methylamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine (AP), N,N-dimethylamphetamine (DMA) and p-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) synthesised via common synthetic pathways including reductive amination, Leuckart method, Nagai method, Emde method, Birch reduction, “Moscow” method, Wacker process, “Nitrostyrene” method and the Peracid oxidation method.Contaminants can facilitate identification of the synthetic route, origin of precursors and may suggest information as to the location of manufacture of these illicit drugs. Contaminant profiling can provide vital intelligence for investigations in which linking seizures or identifying the synthetic pathway is essential. This review article presents an accessible resource; a compilation of contaminants resulting from a variety of manufacturing methods used to synthesise the most common ATS. It is important for research in this field to continue as valuable information can be extracted from illicit drug samples, increasing discrimination amongst ATS, and in turn, leading to an increase in evidential value and forensic drug intelligence from forensic drug samples

AB - Amphetamine-type substances (ATS), like other synthetically derived compounds, can be produced by a multitude of synthetic pathways using a variety of precursors and reagents, resulting in a large number of possible contaminants (by-products, intermediates and impurities). This review article describes the common contaminants found in preparations of methylamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine (AP), N,N-dimethylamphetamine (DMA) and p-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) synthesised via common synthetic pathways including reductive amination, Leuckart method, Nagai method, Emde method, Birch reduction, “Moscow” method, Wacker process, “Nitrostyrene” method and the Peracid oxidation method.Contaminants can facilitate identification of the synthetic route, origin of precursors and may suggest information as to the location of manufacture of these illicit drugs. Contaminant profiling can provide vital intelligence for investigations in which linking seizures or identifying the synthetic pathway is essential. This review article presents an accessible resource; a compilation of contaminants resulting from a variety of manufacturing methods used to synthesise the most common ATS. It is important for research in this field to continue as valuable information can be extracted from illicit drug samples, increasing discrimination amongst ATS, and in turn, leading to an increase in evidential value and forensic drug intelligence from forensic drug samples

KW - Methylamphetamine

KW - Impurity profiling

KW - 3

KW - 4-methylenedioxymethlamphetamine

U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.040

DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.040

M3 - Article

VL - 224

SP - 8

EP - 26

JO - Forensic Science

JF - Forensic Science

SN - 0379-0738

IS - 1-3

ER -