A single system explains human speed perception

Jeroen J.A. Van Boxtel, Raymond Van Ee, Casper J. Erkelens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motion is fully described by a direction and a speed. The processing of direction information by the visual system has been extensively studied; much less is known, however, about the processing of speed. Although it is generally accepted that the direction of motion is processed by a single motion system, no such consensus exists for speed. Psychophysical data from humans suggest two separate systems processing luminance-based fast and slow speeds, whereas neurophysiological recordings in monkeys generally show continuous speed representation, hinting at a single system. Although the neurophysiological findings hint at a single system, they remain inconclusive as only a limited amount of cells can be measured per study and, possibly, the putative different motion systems are anatomically separate. In three psychophysical motion adaptation experiments, we show that predictions on the basis of the two-motion system hypothesis are not met. Instead, concurrent modeling showed that both here-presented and previous data are consistent with a single system subserving human speed perception. These findings have important implications for computational models of motion processing and the low-level organization of the process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1808-1819
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Systems
Haplorhini
Consensus
recording
organization
experiment
Direction compound
Psychophysical
Monkey
Cells
Experiment
Modeling
Processing Speed
Prediction
Computational Model

Cite this

Van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A. ; Van Ee, Raymond ; Erkelens, Casper J. / A single system explains human speed perception. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 11. pp. 1808-1819.
@article{ae849ae45f9441fcbc0f40f206a5dda0,
title = "A single system explains human speed perception",
abstract = "Motion is fully described by a direction and a speed. The processing of direction information by the visual system has been extensively studied; much less is known, however, about the processing of speed. Although it is generally accepted that the direction of motion is processed by a single motion system, no such consensus exists for speed. Psychophysical data from humans suggest two separate systems processing luminance-based fast and slow speeds, whereas neurophysiological recordings in monkeys generally show continuous speed representation, hinting at a single system. Although the neurophysiological findings hint at a single system, they remain inconclusive as only a limited amount of cells can be measured per study and, possibly, the putative different motion systems are anatomically separate. In three psychophysical motion adaptation experiments, we show that predictions on the basis of the two-motion system hypothesis are not met. Instead, concurrent modeling showed that both here-presented and previous data are consistent with a single system subserving human speed perception. These findings have important implications for computational models of motion processing and the low-level organization of the process.",
author = "{Van Boxtel}, {Jeroen J.A.} and {Van Ee}, Raymond and Erkelens, {Casper J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1808",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1808--1819",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press - Journals",
number = "11",

}

A single system explains human speed perception. / Van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.; Van Ee, Raymond; Erkelens, Casper J.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 18, No. 11, 01.11.2006, p. 1808-1819.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A single system explains human speed perception

AU - Van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.

AU - Van Ee, Raymond

AU - Erkelens, Casper J.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Motion is fully described by a direction and a speed. The processing of direction information by the visual system has been extensively studied; much less is known, however, about the processing of speed. Although it is generally accepted that the direction of motion is processed by a single motion system, no such consensus exists for speed. Psychophysical data from humans suggest two separate systems processing luminance-based fast and slow speeds, whereas neurophysiological recordings in monkeys generally show continuous speed representation, hinting at a single system. Although the neurophysiological findings hint at a single system, they remain inconclusive as only a limited amount of cells can be measured per study and, possibly, the putative different motion systems are anatomically separate. In three psychophysical motion adaptation experiments, we show that predictions on the basis of the two-motion system hypothesis are not met. Instead, concurrent modeling showed that both here-presented and previous data are consistent with a single system subserving human speed perception. These findings have important implications for computational models of motion processing and the low-level organization of the process.

AB - Motion is fully described by a direction and a speed. The processing of direction information by the visual system has been extensively studied; much less is known, however, about the processing of speed. Although it is generally accepted that the direction of motion is processed by a single motion system, no such consensus exists for speed. Psychophysical data from humans suggest two separate systems processing luminance-based fast and slow speeds, whereas neurophysiological recordings in monkeys generally show continuous speed representation, hinting at a single system. Although the neurophysiological findings hint at a single system, they remain inconclusive as only a limited amount of cells can be measured per study and, possibly, the putative different motion systems are anatomically separate. In three psychophysical motion adaptation experiments, we show that predictions on the basis of the two-motion system hypothesis are not met. Instead, concurrent modeling showed that both here-presented and previous data are consistent with a single system subserving human speed perception. These findings have important implications for computational models of motion processing and the low-level organization of the process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750545768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1808

DO - 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1808

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1808

EP - 1819

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 11

ER -