A social scientist’s view of science adoption and uptake

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

I argue that the science of 'adoption and uptake' is a limited framing of the problem that is better understood as 'science into action'. I suggest that Kurt Lewin's original action research framework offers a useful paradigm for conceptualising and informing how to translate science into action. This framework urges scientists (and others) to understand more fully the social system in which behaviours such as 'adoption' and 'uptake' (and more usually, 'non-adoption' and 'non-uptake') occur, with a focus on the interdependence of actors within a psychological environment that is normally in a state of quasi-stationary equilibrium but also characterised by internal and external tensions. System change requires 'unfreezing', or the destabilisation of quasi-stationary equilibrium, before movement and subsequent refreezing. This suggests that we scientists would gain better insight into the failure of science to translate into sustained, durable action, if we consider the issue from the point of view of a citizen or policy-maker, for whom science is just one of many sources of influence on decision-making and behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-37
Number of pages7
JournalJournal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit
Volume9
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

proprioception
decision making
Health Services Research
Administrative Personnel
Decision Making
Psychology

Cite this

@article{6b79b5c9f6cf4118b9107ba3d92908e7,
title = "A social scientist’s view of science adoption and uptake",
abstract = "I argue that the science of 'adoption and uptake' is a limited framing of the problem that is better understood as 'science into action'. I suggest that Kurt Lewin's original action research framework offers a useful paradigm for conceptualising and informing how to translate science into action. This framework urges scientists (and others) to understand more fully the social system in which behaviours such as 'adoption' and 'uptake' (and more usually, 'non-adoption' and 'non-uptake') occur, with a focus on the interdependence of actors within a psychological environment that is normally in a state of quasi-stationary equilibrium but also characterised by internal and external tensions. System change requires 'unfreezing', or the destabilisation of quasi-stationary equilibrium, before movement and subsequent refreezing. This suggests that we scientists would gain better insight into the failure of science to translate into sustained, durable action, if we consider the issue from the point of view of a citizen or policy-maker, for whom science is just one of many sources of influence on decision-making and behaviour.",
keywords = "Science adoption, Science policy, Social behaviour, Social psychology",
author = "Iain WALKER",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00003-014-0896-6",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "31--37",
journal = "Journal fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit",
issn = "1661-5751",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",
number = "S1",

}

A social scientist’s view of science adoption and uptake. / WALKER, Iain.

In: Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Vol. 9, No. S1, 07.2014, p. 31-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - A social scientist’s view of science adoption and uptake

AU - WALKER, Iain

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - I argue that the science of 'adoption and uptake' is a limited framing of the problem that is better understood as 'science into action'. I suggest that Kurt Lewin's original action research framework offers a useful paradigm for conceptualising and informing how to translate science into action. This framework urges scientists (and others) to understand more fully the social system in which behaviours such as 'adoption' and 'uptake' (and more usually, 'non-adoption' and 'non-uptake') occur, with a focus on the interdependence of actors within a psychological environment that is normally in a state of quasi-stationary equilibrium but also characterised by internal and external tensions. System change requires 'unfreezing', or the destabilisation of quasi-stationary equilibrium, before movement and subsequent refreezing. This suggests that we scientists would gain better insight into the failure of science to translate into sustained, durable action, if we consider the issue from the point of view of a citizen or policy-maker, for whom science is just one of many sources of influence on decision-making and behaviour.

AB - I argue that the science of 'adoption and uptake' is a limited framing of the problem that is better understood as 'science into action'. I suggest that Kurt Lewin's original action research framework offers a useful paradigm for conceptualising and informing how to translate science into action. This framework urges scientists (and others) to understand more fully the social system in which behaviours such as 'adoption' and 'uptake' (and more usually, 'non-adoption' and 'non-uptake') occur, with a focus on the interdependence of actors within a psychological environment that is normally in a state of quasi-stationary equilibrium but also characterised by internal and external tensions. System change requires 'unfreezing', or the destabilisation of quasi-stationary equilibrium, before movement and subsequent refreezing. This suggests that we scientists would gain better insight into the failure of science to translate into sustained, durable action, if we consider the issue from the point of view of a citizen or policy-maker, for whom science is just one of many sources of influence on decision-making and behaviour.

KW - Science adoption

KW - Science policy

KW - Social behaviour

KW - Social psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903897104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/social-scientists-view-science-adoption-uptake

U2 - 10.1007/s00003-014-0896-6

DO - 10.1007/s00003-014-0896-6

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 9

SP - 31

EP - 37

JO - Journal fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

JF - Journal fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

SN - 1661-5751

IS - S1

ER -