A Sociological Reading of Classical Sociological Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

"Do we still need to talk about the classics?" is perhaps one of the most basic yet difficult questions students and scholars of sociology face today. Mastery of the work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim remains to be a badge of membership—a rite of passage to become part of a community of professional sociologists. However, theory, as Robert Cox argues, is always for someone and for some purpose. Theories are always derived from particular standpoints and privilege certain perspectives. This article aims to unpack the classics' epistemological assumptions and argue for a critical renegotiation of their legacy. There is a need to contextualize, provincialize, and pluralize the classics to make them cognizant of non-Western and non-masculine accounts of modernity. The aim is to explore the possibilities of an approach that allows sociologists to make connections between social worlds without using European modernity as central referent for analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-288
Number of pages24
JournalPhilippine Sociological Review
Volume61
Issue numberS1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sociological theory
sociologist
modernity
ritual
privilege
sociology
community
student

Cite this

@article{849045ba9468493c97e73d80b63336d8,
title = "A Sociological Reading of Classical Sociological Theory",
abstract = "{"}Do we still need to talk about the classics?{"} is perhaps one of the most basic yet difficult questions students and scholars of sociology face today. Mastery of the work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim remains to be a badge of membership—a rite of passage to become part of a community of professional sociologists. However, theory, as Robert Cox argues, is always for someone and for some purpose. Theories are always derived from particular standpoints and privilege certain perspectives. This article aims to unpack the classics' epistemological assumptions and argue for a critical renegotiation of their legacy. There is a need to contextualize, provincialize, and pluralize the classics to make them cognizant of non-Western and non-masculine accounts of modernity. The aim is to explore the possibilities of an approach that allows sociologists to make connections between social worlds without using European modernity as central referent for analysis.",
keywords = "classical sociological theory, Marx, Weber, Durkheim, post-colonial theory, indigenization",
author = "Nicole CURATO",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "265--288",
journal = "Philippine Sociological Review",
issn = "0031-7810",
number = "S1",

}

A Sociological Reading of Classical Sociological Theory. / CURATO, Nicole.

In: Philippine Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. S1, 2013, p. 265-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Sociological Reading of Classical Sociological Theory

AU - CURATO, Nicole

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - "Do we still need to talk about the classics?" is perhaps one of the most basic yet difficult questions students and scholars of sociology face today. Mastery of the work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim remains to be a badge of membership—a rite of passage to become part of a community of professional sociologists. However, theory, as Robert Cox argues, is always for someone and for some purpose. Theories are always derived from particular standpoints and privilege certain perspectives. This article aims to unpack the classics' epistemological assumptions and argue for a critical renegotiation of their legacy. There is a need to contextualize, provincialize, and pluralize the classics to make them cognizant of non-Western and non-masculine accounts of modernity. The aim is to explore the possibilities of an approach that allows sociologists to make connections between social worlds without using European modernity as central referent for analysis.

AB - "Do we still need to talk about the classics?" is perhaps one of the most basic yet difficult questions students and scholars of sociology face today. Mastery of the work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim remains to be a badge of membership—a rite of passage to become part of a community of professional sociologists. However, theory, as Robert Cox argues, is always for someone and for some purpose. Theories are always derived from particular standpoints and privilege certain perspectives. This article aims to unpack the classics' epistemological assumptions and argue for a critical renegotiation of their legacy. There is a need to contextualize, provincialize, and pluralize the classics to make them cognizant of non-Western and non-masculine accounts of modernity. The aim is to explore the possibilities of an approach that allows sociologists to make connections between social worlds without using European modernity as central referent for analysis.

KW - classical sociological theory

KW - Marx

KW - Weber

KW - Durkheim

KW - post-colonial theory

KW - indigenization

UR - https://www.jstor.org/stable/43486376?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 265

EP - 288

JO - Philippine Sociological Review

JF - Philippine Sociological Review

SN - 0031-7810

IS - S1

ER -