A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved?

Gordon Waddington, Stephen Trathen, Tracey Dickson, Roger Adams, Adrian Rumore

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Currently, there are no recommended assessment protocols for monitoring possible effects of head injury in snowsports athletes who are in competition and training. Objective: This project evaluated the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) for concussion assessment in a snowsport athlete group. In addition, the project determined the effectiveness of enhancing the SCAT2 protocol by using accelerometer smartphone technology in the balance assessment component of the test battery, with a view to an enhanced protocol for assessment of changes in human motor performance post-concussion injury. Methods: The research team recruited 22 athletes from the New South Wales Institute of Sport and the Olympic Winter Institute Australia snowsport athlete squads who were undertaking baseline sport science testing during the Australian 2012 and 2013 winter seasons. Results: Overall correlation between the SCAT 2 over two separate occasions was moderate/strong (Pearson’s r = 0.58, p = 0.006). Examination of the subcategories within the SCAT2 indicated that the overall correlation was being mediated by the strong correlation of the subset “Symptom Score.” The subset “Balance Score” did not correlate across test occasions (r = 0.42, p = 0.054). There were no other significant correlations across the two occasions of testing. Those who had reported a major head impact history, signified by damage to their helmet during the impact, were significantly older (21.5, SD 4.6 years) than the group not reporting a major head impact (17.5, SD 2.6 years). Two of the instrumented balance test measures, one in the double-leg stance and one in the single-leg stance protocol, showed a significant difference between the “major helmet impact” and “no helmet impact” groups warranting further investigation in a larger sample.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSnow Sports Trauma and Safety
PublisherSpringer
Pages51-61
Number of pages11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event International Congress on Ski Trauma and Safety - Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy
Duration: 8 Mar 201513 Mar 2015

Publication series

NameSnow Sports Trauma and Safety

Conference

Conference International Congress on Ski Trauma and Safety
Abbreviated titleISSS
CountryItaly
CityCortina d’Ampezzo
Period8/03/1513/03/15

Fingerprint

Sports
Head Protective Devices
Athletes
Leg
Head
New South Wales
Craniocerebral Trauma
History
Technology
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Cite this

Waddington, G., Trathen, S., Dickson, T., Adams, R., & Rumore, A. (2017). A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved? In Snow Sports Trauma and Safety (pp. 51-61). (Snow Sports Trauma and Safety). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5
Waddington, Gordon ; Trathen, Stephen ; Dickson, Tracey ; Adams, Roger ; Rumore, Adrian. / A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved?. Snow Sports Trauma and Safety. Springer, 2017. pp. 51-61 (Snow Sports Trauma and Safety).
@inproceedings{60b990b155d14af28b7068c9867e8011,
title = "A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved?",
abstract = "Background: Currently, there are no recommended assessment protocols for monitoring possible effects of head injury in snowsports athletes who are in competition and training. Objective: This project evaluated the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) for concussion assessment in a snowsport athlete group. In addition, the project determined the effectiveness of enhancing the SCAT2 protocol by using accelerometer smartphone technology in the balance assessment component of the test battery, with a view to an enhanced protocol for assessment of changes in human motor performance post-concussion injury. Methods: The research team recruited 22 athletes from the New South Wales Institute of Sport and the Olympic Winter Institute Australia snowsport athlete squads who were undertaking baseline sport science testing during the Australian 2012 and 2013 winter seasons. Results: Overall correlation between the SCAT 2 over two separate occasions was moderate/strong (Pearson’s r = 0.58, p = 0.006). Examination of the subcategories within the SCAT2 indicated that the overall correlation was being mediated by the strong correlation of the subset “Symptom Score.” The subset “Balance Score” did not correlate across test occasions (r = 0.42, p = 0.054). There were no other significant correlations across the two occasions of testing. Those who had reported a major head impact history, signified by damage to their helmet during the impact, were significantly older (21.5, SD 4.6 years) than the group not reporting a major head impact (17.5, SD 2.6 years). Two of the instrumented balance test measures, one in the double-leg stance and one in the single-leg stance protocol, showed a significant difference between the “major helmet impact” and “no helmet impact” groups warranting further investigation in a larger sample.",
keywords = "Skiing, Snowboarding, Concussion, Concussion assessment",
author = "Gordon Waddington and Stephen Trathen and Tracey Dickson and Roger Adams and Adrian Rumore",
note = "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5",
language = "English",
series = "Snow Sports Trauma and Safety",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "51--61",
booktitle = "Snow Sports Trauma and Safety",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Waddington, G, Trathen, S, Dickson, T, Adams, R & Rumore, A 2017, A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved? in Snow Sports Trauma and Safety. Snow Sports Trauma and Safety, Springer, pp. 51-61, International Congress on Ski Trauma and Safety, Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy, 8/03/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5

A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved? / Waddington, Gordon; Trathen, Stephen; Dickson, Tracey; Adams, Roger; Rumore, Adrian.

Snow Sports Trauma and Safety. Springer, 2017. p. 51-61 (Snow Sports Trauma and Safety).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved?

AU - Waddington, Gordon

AU - Trathen, Stephen

AU - Dickson, Tracey

AU - Adams, Roger

AU - Rumore, Adrian

N1 - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Currently, there are no recommended assessment protocols for monitoring possible effects of head injury in snowsports athletes who are in competition and training. Objective: This project evaluated the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) for concussion assessment in a snowsport athlete group. In addition, the project determined the effectiveness of enhancing the SCAT2 protocol by using accelerometer smartphone technology in the balance assessment component of the test battery, with a view to an enhanced protocol for assessment of changes in human motor performance post-concussion injury. Methods: The research team recruited 22 athletes from the New South Wales Institute of Sport and the Olympic Winter Institute Australia snowsport athlete squads who were undertaking baseline sport science testing during the Australian 2012 and 2013 winter seasons. Results: Overall correlation between the SCAT 2 over two separate occasions was moderate/strong (Pearson’s r = 0.58, p = 0.006). Examination of the subcategories within the SCAT2 indicated that the overall correlation was being mediated by the strong correlation of the subset “Symptom Score.” The subset “Balance Score” did not correlate across test occasions (r = 0.42, p = 0.054). There were no other significant correlations across the two occasions of testing. Those who had reported a major head impact history, signified by damage to their helmet during the impact, were significantly older (21.5, SD 4.6 years) than the group not reporting a major head impact (17.5, SD 2.6 years). Two of the instrumented balance test measures, one in the double-leg stance and one in the single-leg stance protocol, showed a significant difference between the “major helmet impact” and “no helmet impact” groups warranting further investigation in a larger sample.

AB - Background: Currently, there are no recommended assessment protocols for monitoring possible effects of head injury in snowsports athletes who are in competition and training. Objective: This project evaluated the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) for concussion assessment in a snowsport athlete group. In addition, the project determined the effectiveness of enhancing the SCAT2 protocol by using accelerometer smartphone technology in the balance assessment component of the test battery, with a view to an enhanced protocol for assessment of changes in human motor performance post-concussion injury. Methods: The research team recruited 22 athletes from the New South Wales Institute of Sport and the Olympic Winter Institute Australia snowsport athlete squads who were undertaking baseline sport science testing during the Australian 2012 and 2013 winter seasons. Results: Overall correlation between the SCAT 2 over two separate occasions was moderate/strong (Pearson’s r = 0.58, p = 0.006). Examination of the subcategories within the SCAT2 indicated that the overall correlation was being mediated by the strong correlation of the subset “Symptom Score.” The subset “Balance Score” did not correlate across test occasions (r = 0.42, p = 0.054). There were no other significant correlations across the two occasions of testing. Those who had reported a major head impact history, signified by damage to their helmet during the impact, were significantly older (21.5, SD 4.6 years) than the group not reporting a major head impact (17.5, SD 2.6 years). Two of the instrumented balance test measures, one in the double-leg stance and one in the single-leg stance protocol, showed a significant difference between the “major helmet impact” and “no helmet impact” groups warranting further investigation in a larger sample.

KW - Skiing

KW - Snowboarding

KW - Concussion

KW - Concussion assessment

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/sport-concussion-assessment-tool-scat2-snowsports-balance-component-tool-improved

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Snow Sports Trauma and Safety

SP - 51

EP - 61

BT - Snow Sports Trauma and Safety

PB - Springer

ER -

Waddington G, Trathen S, Dickson T, Adams R, Rumore A. A Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) for Use in Snowsports: Can the Balance Component of the Tool Be Improved? In Snow Sports Trauma and Safety. Springer. 2017. p. 51-61. (Snow Sports Trauma and Safety). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52755-0_5