A systematic review of baseline psychosocial characterisation in dietary randomised controlled trials for weight loss

S. M. Somerset, K. Markwell, M. Al-Foraih

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/objective:To investigate the extent of baseline psychosocial characterisation of subjects in published dietary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for weight loss.Subjects/methods:Systematic review of adequately sized (n≥10) RCTs comprising ≥1 diet-alone arm for weight loss were included for this systematic review. More specifically, trials included overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m 2) adults, were of duration ≥8 weeks and had body weight as the primary outcome. Exclusion criteria included specific psychological intervention (for example, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)), use of web-based tools, use of supplements, liquid diets, replacement meals and very-low calorie diets. Physical activity intervention was restricted to general exercise only (not supervised or prescribed, for example, VO 2 maximum level).Results:Of 176 weight-loss RCTs published during 2008-2010, 15 met selection criteria and were assessed for reported psychological characterisation of subjects. All studies reported standard characterisation of clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects. Eleven studies reported no psychological attributes of subjects (three of these did exclude those taking psychoactive medication). Three studies collected data on particular aspects of psychology related to specific research objectives (figure scale rating, satiety and quality-of-life). Only one study provided a comprehensive background on psychological attributes of subjects.Conclusion:Better characterisation in behaviour-change interventions will reduce potential confounding and enhance generalisability of such studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-702
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume67
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Weight Loss
Randomized Controlled Trials
Psychology
Diet
Caloric Restriction
Cognitive Therapy
Patient Selection
Meals
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Quality of Life
Research

Cite this

@article{acd89594f30f45d29701a9a8c14dea55,
title = "A systematic review of baseline psychosocial characterisation in dietary randomised controlled trials for weight loss",
abstract = "Background/objective:To investigate the extent of baseline psychosocial characterisation of subjects in published dietary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for weight loss.Subjects/methods:Systematic review of adequately sized (n≥10) RCTs comprising ≥1 diet-alone arm for weight loss were included for this systematic review. More specifically, trials included overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m 2) adults, were of duration ≥8 weeks and had body weight as the primary outcome. Exclusion criteria included specific psychological intervention (for example, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)), use of web-based tools, use of supplements, liquid diets, replacement meals and very-low calorie diets. Physical activity intervention was restricted to general exercise only (not supervised or prescribed, for example, VO 2 maximum level).Results:Of 176 weight-loss RCTs published during 2008-2010, 15 met selection criteria and were assessed for reported psychological characterisation of subjects. All studies reported standard characterisation of clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects. Eleven studies reported no psychological attributes of subjects (three of these did exclude those taking psychoactive medication). Three studies collected data on particular aspects of psychology related to specific research objectives (figure scale rating, satiety and quality-of-life). Only one study provided a comprehensive background on psychological attributes of subjects.Conclusion:Better characterisation in behaviour-change interventions will reduce potential confounding and enhance generalisability of such studies.",
keywords = "diet, psychological factors, randomised controlled trial, weight loss",
author = "Somerset, {S. M.} and K. Markwell and M. Al-Foraih",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/ejcn.2013.77",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "697--702",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

A systematic review of baseline psychosocial characterisation in dietary randomised controlled trials for weight loss. / Somerset, S. M.; Markwell, K.; Al-Foraih, M.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 67, No. 7, 01.07.2013, p. 697-702.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of baseline psychosocial characterisation in dietary randomised controlled trials for weight loss

AU - Somerset, S. M.

AU - Markwell, K.

AU - Al-Foraih, M.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Background/objective:To investigate the extent of baseline psychosocial characterisation of subjects in published dietary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for weight loss.Subjects/methods:Systematic review of adequately sized (n≥10) RCTs comprising ≥1 diet-alone arm for weight loss were included for this systematic review. More specifically, trials included overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m 2) adults, were of duration ≥8 weeks and had body weight as the primary outcome. Exclusion criteria included specific psychological intervention (for example, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)), use of web-based tools, use of supplements, liquid diets, replacement meals and very-low calorie diets. Physical activity intervention was restricted to general exercise only (not supervised or prescribed, for example, VO 2 maximum level).Results:Of 176 weight-loss RCTs published during 2008-2010, 15 met selection criteria and were assessed for reported psychological characterisation of subjects. All studies reported standard characterisation of clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects. Eleven studies reported no psychological attributes of subjects (three of these did exclude those taking psychoactive medication). Three studies collected data on particular aspects of psychology related to specific research objectives (figure scale rating, satiety and quality-of-life). Only one study provided a comprehensive background on psychological attributes of subjects.Conclusion:Better characterisation in behaviour-change interventions will reduce potential confounding and enhance generalisability of such studies.

AB - Background/objective:To investigate the extent of baseline psychosocial characterisation of subjects in published dietary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for weight loss.Subjects/methods:Systematic review of adequately sized (n≥10) RCTs comprising ≥1 diet-alone arm for weight loss were included for this systematic review. More specifically, trials included overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m 2) adults, were of duration ≥8 weeks and had body weight as the primary outcome. Exclusion criteria included specific psychological intervention (for example, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)), use of web-based tools, use of supplements, liquid diets, replacement meals and very-low calorie diets. Physical activity intervention was restricted to general exercise only (not supervised or prescribed, for example, VO 2 maximum level).Results:Of 176 weight-loss RCTs published during 2008-2010, 15 met selection criteria and were assessed for reported psychological characterisation of subjects. All studies reported standard characterisation of clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects. Eleven studies reported no psychological attributes of subjects (three of these did exclude those taking psychoactive medication). Three studies collected data on particular aspects of psychology related to specific research objectives (figure scale rating, satiety and quality-of-life). Only one study provided a comprehensive background on psychological attributes of subjects.Conclusion:Better characterisation in behaviour-change interventions will reduce potential confounding and enhance generalisability of such studies.

KW - diet

KW - psychological factors

KW - randomised controlled trial

KW - weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880131530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ejcn.2013.77

DO - 10.1038/ejcn.2013.77

M3 - Review article

VL - 67

SP - 697

EP - 702

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

IS - 7

ER -