Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols

  • the WDAD Study Group
  • , on behalf of the WDAD Study Group
  • , Peter Nydahl
  • , Keibun Liu
  • , Giuseppe Bellelli
  • , Julie Benbenishty
  • , Mark Van Den Boogaard
  • , Gideon Caplan
  • , Chi Ryang Chung
  • , Muhammed Elhadi
  • , Mohan Gurjar
  • , Gabi Heras-La Calle
  • , Magdalena Hoffmann
  • , Marie Madlen Jeitziner
  • , Karla Krewulak
  • , Tanya Mailhot
  • , Alessandro Morandi
  • , Ricardo Kenji Nawa
  • , Esther S. Oh
  • , Marie O. Collet
  • Maria Carolina Paulino, Heidi Lindroth, Rebecca Von Haken, Kasia BAIL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective: To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design: Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting: Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods: Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results: Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion: Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume53
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this