Accountability in Australia: Control, Paradox and Accountability

John Halligan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Accountability in the Australian federal system has changed in distinctive ways during the last three decades of public sector reform. In association with each major environmental change has been an extension to accountability from the traditional features of ministerial responsibility and bureaucratic hierarchy to new modes of external scrutiny, accountability management, and most recently accountability within market and governance contexts. Each experiment at the national level, however, has had limitations that produce knock on effects. The paradox of accountability is that attempts to satisfy needs for control have led new forms and variations. The result has been the multiplication of accountability mechanisms and increasing complexity
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)453-479
    Number of pages27
    JournalPublic Administration Quarterly
    Volume31
    Issue number3/4
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    responsibility
    public sector
    governance
    reform
    experiment
    market
    management

    Cite this

    @article{6e83e211bf3046ea9a0735d15f123c75,
    title = "Accountability in Australia: Control, Paradox and Accountability",
    abstract = "Accountability in the Australian federal system has changed in distinctive ways during the last three decades of public sector reform. In association with each major environmental change has been an extension to accountability from the traditional features of ministerial responsibility and bureaucratic hierarchy to new modes of external scrutiny, accountability management, and most recently accountability within market and governance contexts. Each experiment at the national level, however, has had limitations that produce knock on effects. The paradox of accountability is that attempts to satisfy needs for control have led new forms and variations. The result has been the multiplication of accountability mechanisms and increasing complexity",
    author = "John Halligan",
    year = "2007",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "453--479",
    journal = "Public Administration Quarterly",
    issn = "0734-9149",
    publisher = "Southern Public Administration Education Foundation Inc.",
    number = "3/4",

    }

    Accountability in Australia: Control, Paradox and Accountability. / Halligan, John.

    In: Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3/4, 2007, p. 453-479.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Accountability in Australia: Control, Paradox and Accountability

    AU - Halligan, John

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Accountability in the Australian federal system has changed in distinctive ways during the last three decades of public sector reform. In association with each major environmental change has been an extension to accountability from the traditional features of ministerial responsibility and bureaucratic hierarchy to new modes of external scrutiny, accountability management, and most recently accountability within market and governance contexts. Each experiment at the national level, however, has had limitations that produce knock on effects. The paradox of accountability is that attempts to satisfy needs for control have led new forms and variations. The result has been the multiplication of accountability mechanisms and increasing complexity

    AB - Accountability in the Australian federal system has changed in distinctive ways during the last three decades of public sector reform. In association with each major environmental change has been an extension to accountability from the traditional features of ministerial responsibility and bureaucratic hierarchy to new modes of external scrutiny, accountability management, and most recently accountability within market and governance contexts. Each experiment at the national level, however, has had limitations that produce knock on effects. The paradox of accountability is that attempts to satisfy needs for control have led new forms and variations. The result has been the multiplication of accountability mechanisms and increasing complexity

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 453

    EP - 479

    JO - Public Administration Quarterly

    JF - Public Administration Quarterly

    SN - 0734-9149

    IS - 3/4

    ER -