Accounting without accounting: Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses

Fábio Frezatti, David CARTER, Marcelo Barroso

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose: An effective management accounting information system (MAIS), as well as the accounting discourse related to it, can support, facilitate, enable, and constrain diverse business discourses. This paper aims to examine the discursive and organisational effects of an organisation accounting upon absent accounting artefacts, i.e. accounting without accounting. Situated within the discursive literature, this paper examines the construction of competing articulations of the organisation by focusing on what accounting does or does not do within an organisation. In particular, the paper acknowledges the fundamental importance of the accounting discourse in supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining competing organisational discourses, as it illustrates how the absence of accounting centralises power within the organisation. Design/methodology/approach: From a rhetorical, discursive perspective, the authors develop an in-depth qualitative case study in a manufacturing organisation where MAIS has been abandoned for approximately two years. Interpretive research approaches, from a post-structural perspective, provided the base for the structure of the research. The authors studied how other organisational discourses (such as entrepreneurship and growth), which are traditionally constructed with reference to accounting and other artefacts, continued to be produced and sustained. The non-use and non-availability of management accounting information created a vacuum that needed to be filled. The lack of discursive counterpoints and counter-evidence provided by MAIS created a vacuum of information, allowing powerful, proxy discourses to prevail in the organisation, increasing risks to business management. Findings: The absence of MAIS to support an accounting discourse requires that contingent discourses "fill in the discursive gap". Despite appearances, they are no substitute for the accounting discourse. Thus, over time, the entrepreneurial, growth and partners' discourses lose credibility, without the corresponding use of management accounting information and its associated discourse. Originality/value: There are at least two main contributions from the case study and the findings presented in this paper: first, they provide a new perspective for studying MAIS, as a specific organisational discourse among other discourses that shape people relationship within the organisation as an examination of accounting without accounting. Second, this discussion reinforces the relevance of accounting discourse for other organisational discourses, supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining them, by demonstrating the effects of its absence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)426-464
    Number of pages39
    JournalAccounting Auditing and Accountability
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Discourse
    Organizational discourse
    Management accounting
    Accounting information systems
    Accounting information
    Entrepreneurial growth
    Articulation
    Credibility
    Design methodology
    Rhetoric
    Interpretive research
    Entrepreneurship
    Business management
    Substitute
    Manufacturing organizations
    Increasing risk

    Cite this

    @article{448e0a2528644cb7bc577ab886f833bf,
    title = "Accounting without accounting: Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses",
    abstract = "Purpose: An effective management accounting information system (MAIS), as well as the accounting discourse related to it, can support, facilitate, enable, and constrain diverse business discourses. This paper aims to examine the discursive and organisational effects of an organisation accounting upon absent accounting artefacts, i.e. accounting without accounting. Situated within the discursive literature, this paper examines the construction of competing articulations of the organisation by focusing on what accounting does or does not do within an organisation. In particular, the paper acknowledges the fundamental importance of the accounting discourse in supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining competing organisational discourses, as it illustrates how the absence of accounting centralises power within the organisation. Design/methodology/approach: From a rhetorical, discursive perspective, the authors develop an in-depth qualitative case study in a manufacturing organisation where MAIS has been abandoned for approximately two years. Interpretive research approaches, from a post-structural perspective, provided the base for the structure of the research. The authors studied how other organisational discourses (such as entrepreneurship and growth), which are traditionally constructed with reference to accounting and other artefacts, continued to be produced and sustained. The non-use and non-availability of management accounting information created a vacuum that needed to be filled. The lack of discursive counterpoints and counter-evidence provided by MAIS created a vacuum of information, allowing powerful, proxy discourses to prevail in the organisation, increasing risks to business management. Findings: The absence of MAIS to support an accounting discourse requires that contingent discourses {"}fill in the discursive gap{"}. Despite appearances, they are no substitute for the accounting discourse. Thus, over time, the entrepreneurial, growth and partners' discourses lose credibility, without the corresponding use of management accounting information and its associated discourse. Originality/value: There are at least two main contributions from the case study and the findings presented in this paper: first, they provide a new perspective for studying MAIS, as a specific organisational discourse among other discourses that shape people relationship within the organisation as an examination of accounting without accounting. Second, this discussion reinforces the relevance of accounting discourse for other organisational discourses, supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining them, by demonstrating the effects of its absence.",
    keywords = "Management accounting, Business discourses, Discourse theory, Rhetoric analysis",
    author = "F{\'a}bio Frezatti and David CARTER and Marcelo Barroso",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-01-2012-00927",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "426--464",
    journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
    issn = "0951-3574",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "3",

    }

    Accounting without accounting: Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses. / Frezatti, Fábio; CARTER, David; Barroso, Marcelo.

    In: Accounting Auditing and Accountability, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2014, p. 426-464.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Accounting without accounting: Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses

    AU - Frezatti, Fábio

    AU - CARTER, David

    AU - Barroso, Marcelo

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Purpose: An effective management accounting information system (MAIS), as well as the accounting discourse related to it, can support, facilitate, enable, and constrain diverse business discourses. This paper aims to examine the discursive and organisational effects of an organisation accounting upon absent accounting artefacts, i.e. accounting without accounting. Situated within the discursive literature, this paper examines the construction of competing articulations of the organisation by focusing on what accounting does or does not do within an organisation. In particular, the paper acknowledges the fundamental importance of the accounting discourse in supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining competing organisational discourses, as it illustrates how the absence of accounting centralises power within the organisation. Design/methodology/approach: From a rhetorical, discursive perspective, the authors develop an in-depth qualitative case study in a manufacturing organisation where MAIS has been abandoned for approximately two years. Interpretive research approaches, from a post-structural perspective, provided the base for the structure of the research. The authors studied how other organisational discourses (such as entrepreneurship and growth), which are traditionally constructed with reference to accounting and other artefacts, continued to be produced and sustained. The non-use and non-availability of management accounting information created a vacuum that needed to be filled. The lack of discursive counterpoints and counter-evidence provided by MAIS created a vacuum of information, allowing powerful, proxy discourses to prevail in the organisation, increasing risks to business management. Findings: The absence of MAIS to support an accounting discourse requires that contingent discourses "fill in the discursive gap". Despite appearances, they are no substitute for the accounting discourse. Thus, over time, the entrepreneurial, growth and partners' discourses lose credibility, without the corresponding use of management accounting information and its associated discourse. Originality/value: There are at least two main contributions from the case study and the findings presented in this paper: first, they provide a new perspective for studying MAIS, as a specific organisational discourse among other discourses that shape people relationship within the organisation as an examination of accounting without accounting. Second, this discussion reinforces the relevance of accounting discourse for other organisational discourses, supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining them, by demonstrating the effects of its absence.

    AB - Purpose: An effective management accounting information system (MAIS), as well as the accounting discourse related to it, can support, facilitate, enable, and constrain diverse business discourses. This paper aims to examine the discursive and organisational effects of an organisation accounting upon absent accounting artefacts, i.e. accounting without accounting. Situated within the discursive literature, this paper examines the construction of competing articulations of the organisation by focusing on what accounting does or does not do within an organisation. In particular, the paper acknowledges the fundamental importance of the accounting discourse in supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining competing organisational discourses, as it illustrates how the absence of accounting centralises power within the organisation. Design/methodology/approach: From a rhetorical, discursive perspective, the authors develop an in-depth qualitative case study in a manufacturing organisation where MAIS has been abandoned for approximately two years. Interpretive research approaches, from a post-structural perspective, provided the base for the structure of the research. The authors studied how other organisational discourses (such as entrepreneurship and growth), which are traditionally constructed with reference to accounting and other artefacts, continued to be produced and sustained. The non-use and non-availability of management accounting information created a vacuum that needed to be filled. The lack of discursive counterpoints and counter-evidence provided by MAIS created a vacuum of information, allowing powerful, proxy discourses to prevail in the organisation, increasing risks to business management. Findings: The absence of MAIS to support an accounting discourse requires that contingent discourses "fill in the discursive gap". Despite appearances, they are no substitute for the accounting discourse. Thus, over time, the entrepreneurial, growth and partners' discourses lose credibility, without the corresponding use of management accounting information and its associated discourse. Originality/value: There are at least two main contributions from the case study and the findings presented in this paper: first, they provide a new perspective for studying MAIS, as a specific organisational discourse among other discourses that shape people relationship within the organisation as an examination of accounting without accounting. Second, this discussion reinforces the relevance of accounting discourse for other organisational discourses, supporting, facilitating, enabling, and constraining them, by demonstrating the effects of its absence.

    KW - Management accounting

    KW - Business discourses

    KW - Discourse theory

    KW - Rhetoric analysis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897090409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/accounting-without-accounting-informational-proxies-construction-organisational-discourses

    U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2012-00927

    DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2012-00927

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 426

    EP - 464

    JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

    JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

    SN - 0951-3574

    IS - 3

    ER -