Accurate systematic frameworks are vital to advance ecological and evolutionary studies, with an example from Australian freshwater fish (Hypseleotris)

Timothy Page, David Sternberg, Mark Adams, Stephen Balcombe, Benjamin Cook, Michael Hammer, Jane Hughes, Ryan Woods, Peter UNMACK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The practice of modern evolutionary and ecological research is interdisciplinary, with the process of evolution underpinning the diversity on display. However, the inference of evolutionary patterns can be difficult owing to their historical nature. When the biological units and evolutionary relationships involved are unclear, interpreting any ecological and biological data can be problematic. Herein we explore resulting issues when evolutionary theories rely on an unclear or incomplete biological framework, using some Australian freshwater fish (carp gudgeons: Hypseleotris, Eleotridae) as an example. Specifically, recent theories regarding the role of developmental plasticity on ontogeny and speciation have focused on this group. However, carp gudgeons have complex, and as yet incompletely understood, species boundaries and reproductive biology. Even basic data for the recognised taxa, relating to their phylogenetic relationships, life histories and species distributions, are unclear, have often been misinterpreted and are still in the process of being assembled. Combined, these factors make carp gudgeons a relatively poor group on which to apply more advanced evolutionary theories at the moment, such as the role of developmental plasticity in diversification
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1199-1207
Number of pages9
JournalMarine Freshwater Research
Volume68
Issue number7
Early online date2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accurate systematic frameworks are vital to advance ecological and evolutionary studies, with an example from Australian freshwater fish (Hypseleotris)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this