Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets as assessed by different methods in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: An analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry

  • Christos V. Rizos
  • , Matilda Florentin
  • , Ioannis Skoumas
  • , Konstantinos Tziomalos
  • , Loukianos Rallidis
  • , Vasileios Kotsis
  • , Vasileios Athyros
  • , Emmanouil Skalidis
  • , Genovefa Kolovou
  • , Anastasia Garoufi
  • , Eleni Bilianou
  • , Iosif Koutagiar
  • , Dimitrios Agapakis
  • , Estela Kiouri
  • , Christina Antza
  • , Niki Katsiki
  • , Evangelos Zacharis
  • , Achilleas Attilakos
  • , George Sfikas
  • , Panagiotis Anagnostis
  • Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos, Evangelos N. Liberopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. FH patients often have increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, which further increase CVD risk. Novel methods for accurately calculating LDL-C have been proposed. Methods: Patients with FH were recruited by a network of Greek sites participating in the HELLAS-FH registry. LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald (LDL-CF) and the Martin/Hopkins (LDL-CM/H) equations as well as after correcting LDL-CM/H for Lp(a) levels [LDL-CLp(a)corM/H]. The objective was to compare LDL-C levels and target achievement as estimated by different methods in FH patients. Results: This analysis included 1620 patients (1423 adults and 197 children). In adults at diagnosis, LDL-CF and LDL-CM/H levels were similar [235 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L) vs 235 ± 69 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L), respectively; P = NS], while LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were non-significantly lower than LDL-CF [211 ± 61 mg/dL (5.5 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P = 0.432]. In treated adults (n = 966) both LDL-CF [150 ± 71 mg/dL (3.9 ± 1.8 mmol/L)] and LDL-CM/H levels [151 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L); P = 0.746] were similar, whereas LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were significantly lower than LDL-CF [121 ± 62 mg/dL (3.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P < 0.001]. Target achievement as per latest guidelines in treated patients using the LDL-CM/H (2.5%) and especially LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (10.7%) were significantly different than LDL-CF (2.9%; P < 0.001). In children, all 3 formulas resulted in similar LDL-C levels, both at diagnosis and in treated patients. However, target achievement by LDL-CF was lower compared with LDL-CM/H and LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (22.1 vs 24.8 vs 33.3%; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusion: LDL-CLp(a)corM/H results in significantly lower values and higher target achievement rate in both treated adults and children. If validated in clinical trials, LDL-CLp(a)corM/H may become the method of choice to more accurately estimate 'true' LDL-C levels in FH patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalLipids in Health and Disease
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets as assessed by different methods in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: An analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this