Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK

Tony Bovaird, Gerry STOKER, Tricia Jones, Elke Loeffler, Monica Roncancio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Previous research has suggested that citizen co-production of public services is more likely when the actions involved are easy and can be carried out individually rather than in groups. This article explores whether this holds in local areas of England and Wales. It asks which people are most likely to engage in individual and collective co-production and how people can be influenced to extend their co-production efforts by participating in more collective activities. Data were collected in five areas, using citizen panels organized by local authorities. The findings demonstrate that individual and collective co-production have rather different characteristics and correlates and highlight the importance of distinguishing between them for policy purposes. In particular, collective co-production is likely to be high in relation to any given issue when citizens have a strong sense that people can make a difference (‘political self-efficacy’). ‘Nudges’ to encourage increased co-production had only a weak effect. Points for practitioners Much of the potential pay-off from co-production is likely to arise from group-based activities, so activating citizens to move from individual to collective co-production may be an important issue for policy. This article shows that there is major scope for activating more collective co-production, since the level of collective co-production in which people engage is not strongly predicted by their background and can be influenced by public policy variables. ‘Nudges’ may help to encourage more collective co-production but they may need to be quite strong to succeed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-68
    Number of pages22
    JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
    Volume82
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    coproduction
    public service
    governance
    citizen
    self-efficacy
    public policy
    Group

    Cite this

    @article{ec5485bb33714218a06204c93064ed02,
    title = "Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK",
    abstract = "Previous research has suggested that citizen co-production of public services is more likely when the actions involved are easy and can be carried out individually rather than in groups. This article explores whether this holds in local areas of England and Wales. It asks which people are most likely to engage in individual and collective co-production and how people can be influenced to extend their co-production efforts by participating in more collective activities. Data were collected in five areas, using citizen panels organized by local authorities. The findings demonstrate that individual and collective co-production have rather different characteristics and correlates and highlight the importance of distinguishing between them for policy purposes. In particular, collective co-production is likely to be high in relation to any given issue when citizens have a strong sense that people can make a difference (‘political self-efficacy’). ‘Nudges’ to encourage increased co-production had only a weak effect. Points for practitioners Much of the potential pay-off from co-production is likely to arise from group-based activities, so activating citizens to move from individual to collective co-production may be an important issue for policy. This article shows that there is major scope for activating more collective co-production, since the level of collective co-production in which people engage is not strongly predicted by their background and can be influenced by public policy variables. ‘Nudges’ may help to encourage more collective co-production but they may need to be quite strong to succeed.",
    keywords = "citizen activation, community co-production, co-production correlates, individual co-production, influence strategies, nudge",
    author = "Tony Bovaird and Gerry STOKER and Tricia Jones and Elke Loeffler and Monica Roncancio",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1177/0020852314566009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "82",
    pages = "47--68",
    journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
    issn = "0020-8523",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. / Bovaird, Tony; STOKER, Gerry; Jones, Tricia; Loeffler, Elke; Roncancio, Monica.

    In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2016, p. 47-68.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK

    AU - Bovaird, Tony

    AU - STOKER, Gerry

    AU - Jones, Tricia

    AU - Loeffler, Elke

    AU - Roncancio, Monica

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Previous research has suggested that citizen co-production of public services is more likely when the actions involved are easy and can be carried out individually rather than in groups. This article explores whether this holds in local areas of England and Wales. It asks which people are most likely to engage in individual and collective co-production and how people can be influenced to extend their co-production efforts by participating in more collective activities. Data were collected in five areas, using citizen panels organized by local authorities. The findings demonstrate that individual and collective co-production have rather different characteristics and correlates and highlight the importance of distinguishing between them for policy purposes. In particular, collective co-production is likely to be high in relation to any given issue when citizens have a strong sense that people can make a difference (‘political self-efficacy’). ‘Nudges’ to encourage increased co-production had only a weak effect. Points for practitioners Much of the potential pay-off from co-production is likely to arise from group-based activities, so activating citizens to move from individual to collective co-production may be an important issue for policy. This article shows that there is major scope for activating more collective co-production, since the level of collective co-production in which people engage is not strongly predicted by their background and can be influenced by public policy variables. ‘Nudges’ may help to encourage more collective co-production but they may need to be quite strong to succeed.

    AB - Previous research has suggested that citizen co-production of public services is more likely when the actions involved are easy and can be carried out individually rather than in groups. This article explores whether this holds in local areas of England and Wales. It asks which people are most likely to engage in individual and collective co-production and how people can be influenced to extend their co-production efforts by participating in more collective activities. Data were collected in five areas, using citizen panels organized by local authorities. The findings demonstrate that individual and collective co-production have rather different characteristics and correlates and highlight the importance of distinguishing between them for policy purposes. In particular, collective co-production is likely to be high in relation to any given issue when citizens have a strong sense that people can make a difference (‘political self-efficacy’). ‘Nudges’ to encourage increased co-production had only a weak effect. Points for practitioners Much of the potential pay-off from co-production is likely to arise from group-based activities, so activating citizens to move from individual to collective co-production may be an important issue for policy. This article shows that there is major scope for activating more collective co-production, since the level of collective co-production in which people engage is not strongly predicted by their background and can be influenced by public policy variables. ‘Nudges’ may help to encourage more collective co-production but they may need to be quite strong to succeed.

    KW - citizen activation

    KW - community co-production

    KW - co-production correlates

    KW - individual co-production

    KW - influence strategies

    KW - nudge

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960357724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/activating-collective-coproduction-public-services-influencing-citizens-participate-complex-governan

    U2 - 10.1177/0020852314566009

    DO - 10.1177/0020852314566009

    M3 - Article

    VL - 82

    SP - 47

    EP - 68

    JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

    JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

    SN - 0020-8523

    IS - 1

    ER -