Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation

David Schlosberg, Lisette B. Collins, Simon Niemeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How can public engagement assist in the development of just processes and outcomes in adaptation discourse and policymaking? A concern with justice is at the center of thinking about adaptation that is not only resilient, but also public, engaging, and transformative. Theoretically, the intersection of adaptation, transformation, and environmental and climate justice is examined, before exploring the specific concerns and normative foundations for adaptation policy articulated by local governments, environmental groups, and local residents engaged in adaptation planning in Australia. Despite a discursive disconnect between governmental focus on a risk or resilience-based approach and a community concern with the vulnerability of basic needs and capabilities of everyday life, deliberative engagement in adaptation planning can both address issues of justice and represent a transformative practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-437
Number of pages25
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Schlosberg, David ; Collins, Lisette B. ; Niemeyer, Simon. / Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. In: Environmental Politics. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 413-437.
@article{5e158491e3b148ba8fe4718912200e67,
title = "Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation",
abstract = "How can public engagement assist in the development of just processes and outcomes in adaptation discourse and policymaking? A concern with justice is at the center of thinking about adaptation that is not only resilient, but also public, engaging, and transformative. Theoretically, the intersection of adaptation, transformation, and environmental and climate justice is examined, before exploring the specific concerns and normative foundations for adaptation policy articulated by local governments, environmental groups, and local residents engaged in adaptation planning in Australia. Despite a discursive disconnect between governmental focus on a risk or resilience-based approach and a community concern with the vulnerability of basic needs and capabilities of everyday life, deliberative engagement in adaptation planning can both address issues of justice and represent a transformative practice.",
keywords = "Adaptation, environmental justice, public engagement, resilience",
author = "David Schlosberg and Collins, {Lisette B.} and Simon Niemeyer",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "413--437",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. / Schlosberg, David; Collins, Lisette B.; Niemeyer, Simon.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2017, p. 413-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation

AU - Schlosberg, David

AU - Collins, Lisette B.

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - How can public engagement assist in the development of just processes and outcomes in adaptation discourse and policymaking? A concern with justice is at the center of thinking about adaptation that is not only resilient, but also public, engaging, and transformative. Theoretically, the intersection of adaptation, transformation, and environmental and climate justice is examined, before exploring the specific concerns and normative foundations for adaptation policy articulated by local governments, environmental groups, and local residents engaged in adaptation planning in Australia. Despite a discursive disconnect between governmental focus on a risk or resilience-based approach and a community concern with the vulnerability of basic needs and capabilities of everyday life, deliberative engagement in adaptation planning can both address issues of justice and represent a transformative practice.

AB - How can public engagement assist in the development of just processes and outcomes in adaptation discourse and policymaking? A concern with justice is at the center of thinking about adaptation that is not only resilient, but also public, engaging, and transformative. Theoretically, the intersection of adaptation, transformation, and environmental and climate justice is examined, before exploring the specific concerns and normative foundations for adaptation policy articulated by local governments, environmental groups, and local residents engaged in adaptation planning in Australia. Despite a discursive disconnect between governmental focus on a risk or resilience-based approach and a community concern with the vulnerability of basic needs and capabilities of everyday life, deliberative engagement in adaptation planning can both address issues of justice and represent a transformative practice.

KW - Adaptation

KW - environmental justice

KW - public engagement

KW - resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013092858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/adaptation-policy-community-discourse-risk-vulnerability-just-transformation

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 413

EP - 437

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 3

ER -