Adaptive management intentions with a reality of evaluation: Getting science back into policy

Lyndal Hasselman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Australia's Murray-Darling Basin water reform has been contentious as government attempts to reconcile historical over allocation of water to irrigation with the use of water for environmental outcomes. However, in many aspects, scientific knowledge of the environment is either imperfect, incomplete or environmental responses are unpredictable, with this uncertainty preventing definitive policy and closure of political arguments. In response to uncertainty and knowledge gaps, adaptive management has been written into the legislation, along with provisions for periodic evaluation. This research ascertains how adaptive management is understood by policy makers, with this indicative of future implementation of adaptive management. The way in which adaptive management is constructed by policy makers is determined through legislation, public speeches, government reports and semi-structured interviews. The findings demonstrate that adaptive management has been subsumed by evaluation. The loss of adaptive management as a distinct concept is seen as a loss of science and discovery from the policy process, with the dominance of evaluation discussed as limiting innovation and reinforcing a ‘muddling through’ of policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-17
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

adaptive management
science
evaluation
management
water
legislation
uncertainty
environmental response
knowledge gap
irrigation
policy
innovation
reform
interview
basin
knowledge

Cite this

@article{f915b7cc0eaa4bfd85dfa8383f8a7b52,
title = "Adaptive management intentions with a reality of evaluation: Getting science back into policy",
abstract = "In Australia's Murray-Darling Basin water reform has been contentious as government attempts to reconcile historical over allocation of water to irrigation with the use of water for environmental outcomes. However, in many aspects, scientific knowledge of the environment is either imperfect, incomplete or environmental responses are unpredictable, with this uncertainty preventing definitive policy and closure of political arguments. In response to uncertainty and knowledge gaps, adaptive management has been written into the legislation, along with provisions for periodic evaluation. This research ascertains how adaptive management is understood by policy makers, with this indicative of future implementation of adaptive management. The way in which adaptive management is constructed by policy makers is determined through legislation, public speeches, government reports and semi-structured interviews. The findings demonstrate that adaptive management has been subsumed by evaluation. The loss of adaptive management as a distinct concept is seen as a loss of science and discovery from the policy process, with the dominance of evaluation discussed as limiting innovation and reinforcing a ‘muddling through’ of policy.",
keywords = "Adaptive management, Evaluation, Science, Uncertainty, Accountability",
author = "Lyndal Hasselman",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.018",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "9--17",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Adaptive management intentions with a reality of evaluation: Getting science back into policy. / Hasselman, Lyndal.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 78, 01.12.2017, p. 9-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive management intentions with a reality of evaluation: Getting science back into policy

AU - Hasselman, Lyndal

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In Australia's Murray-Darling Basin water reform has been contentious as government attempts to reconcile historical over allocation of water to irrigation with the use of water for environmental outcomes. However, in many aspects, scientific knowledge of the environment is either imperfect, incomplete or environmental responses are unpredictable, with this uncertainty preventing definitive policy and closure of political arguments. In response to uncertainty and knowledge gaps, adaptive management has been written into the legislation, along with provisions for periodic evaluation. This research ascertains how adaptive management is understood by policy makers, with this indicative of future implementation of adaptive management. The way in which adaptive management is constructed by policy makers is determined through legislation, public speeches, government reports and semi-structured interviews. The findings demonstrate that adaptive management has been subsumed by evaluation. The loss of adaptive management as a distinct concept is seen as a loss of science and discovery from the policy process, with the dominance of evaluation discussed as limiting innovation and reinforcing a ‘muddling through’ of policy.

AB - In Australia's Murray-Darling Basin water reform has been contentious as government attempts to reconcile historical over allocation of water to irrigation with the use of water for environmental outcomes. However, in many aspects, scientific knowledge of the environment is either imperfect, incomplete or environmental responses are unpredictable, with this uncertainty preventing definitive policy and closure of political arguments. In response to uncertainty and knowledge gaps, adaptive management has been written into the legislation, along with provisions for periodic evaluation. This research ascertains how adaptive management is understood by policy makers, with this indicative of future implementation of adaptive management. The way in which adaptive management is constructed by policy makers is determined through legislation, public speeches, government reports and semi-structured interviews. The findings demonstrate that adaptive management has been subsumed by evaluation. The loss of adaptive management as a distinct concept is seen as a loss of science and discovery from the policy process, with the dominance of evaluation discussed as limiting innovation and reinforcing a ‘muddling through’ of policy.

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Evaluation

KW - Science

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Accountability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029486129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.018

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 9

EP - 17

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -