Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adding conditional superannuation to the antidoping policy mix

  • Liam J.A. Lenten
  • , Aaron C.T. Smith
  • , Ralph Christopher Bayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article introduces and then examines a novel antidoping policy mechanism, based upon a conditional superannuation fund for professional athletes. It begins by presenting a theoretical case in favor of the scheme relative to the background of current policy. Consideration is given to the utility and benefits of a conditional superannuation mechanism to augment existing antidoping policy structures. The case is developed using results from a pilot experimental economics study testing the policy proposal, which suggests that the conditional superannuation mechanism has the potential to outperform existing measures, such as fines and bans. This article offers a policy variation that could supplement the existing arrangements as a contiguous mechanism. While no single policy intervention seems plausible in fully eliminating sport doping, a combination of incentive and punitive mechanisms may yield a superior policy mix to help attenuate doping's prevalence in elite sport. The evidence presented here within the antidoping policy context may also recommend the utility of conditional superannuation as a mechanism to address other enduring challenges in sport, such as violence, gambling, and behavioral transgressions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-604
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Sport Management
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adding conditional superannuation to the antidoping policy mix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this