Adults with dyslexia demonstrate space-based and object-based covert attention deficits

Shifting attention to the periphery and shifting attention between objects in the left visual field

Judy Buchholz, Anne Aimola Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Performance on a covert visual attention task is compared between a group of adults with developmental dyslexia (specifically phonological difficulties) and a group of age and IQ matched controls. The group with dyslexia were generally slower to detect validly-cued targets. Costs of shifting attention toward the periphery when the target was invalidly cued were significantly higher for the group with dyslexia, while costs associated with shifts toward the fovea tended to be lower. Higher costs were also shown by the group with dyslexia for up-down shifts of attention in the periphery. A visual field processing difference was found, in that the group with dyslexia showed higher costs associated with shifting attention between objects in they LVF. These findings indicate that these adults with dyslexia have difficulty in both the space-based and the object-based components of covert visual attention, and more specifically to stimuli located in the periphery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-34
Number of pages5
JournalBrain and Cognition
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
Visual Fields
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost Allocation
Visual Field
Object-based Attention
Age Groups
Costs

Cite this

@article{d41f9c176666471cbbd728858d88384a,
title = "Adults with dyslexia demonstrate space-based and object-based covert attention deficits: Shifting attention to the periphery and shifting attention between objects in the left visual field",
abstract = "Performance on a covert visual attention task is compared between a group of adults with developmental dyslexia (specifically phonological difficulties) and a group of age and IQ matched controls. The group with dyslexia were generally slower to detect validly-cued targets. Costs of shifting attention toward the periphery when the target was invalidly cued were significantly higher for the group with dyslexia, while costs associated with shifts toward the fovea tended to be lower. Higher costs were also shown by the group with dyslexia for up-down shifts of attention in the periphery. A visual field processing difference was found, in that the group with dyslexia showed higher costs associated with shifting attention between objects in they LVF. These findings indicate that these adults with dyslexia have difficulty in both the space-based and the object-based components of covert visual attention, and more specifically to stimuli located in the periphery.",
keywords = "Covert attention, Dyslexia, Object-based, Periphery, Shifting attention, Space-based, Visual attention",
author = "Judy Buchholz and Davies, {Anne Aimola}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "30--34",
journal = "Brain and Cognition",
issn = "0278-2626",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adults with dyslexia demonstrate space-based and object-based covert attention deficits

T2 - Shifting attention to the periphery and shifting attention between objects in the left visual field

AU - Buchholz, Judy

AU - Davies, Anne Aimola

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Performance on a covert visual attention task is compared between a group of adults with developmental dyslexia (specifically phonological difficulties) and a group of age and IQ matched controls. The group with dyslexia were generally slower to detect validly-cued targets. Costs of shifting attention toward the periphery when the target was invalidly cued were significantly higher for the group with dyslexia, while costs associated with shifts toward the fovea tended to be lower. Higher costs were also shown by the group with dyslexia for up-down shifts of attention in the periphery. A visual field processing difference was found, in that the group with dyslexia showed higher costs associated with shifting attention between objects in they LVF. These findings indicate that these adults with dyslexia have difficulty in both the space-based and the object-based components of covert visual attention, and more specifically to stimuli located in the periphery.

AB - Performance on a covert visual attention task is compared between a group of adults with developmental dyslexia (specifically phonological difficulties) and a group of age and IQ matched controls. The group with dyslexia were generally slower to detect validly-cued targets. Costs of shifting attention toward the periphery when the target was invalidly cued were significantly higher for the group with dyslexia, while costs associated with shifts toward the fovea tended to be lower. Higher costs were also shown by the group with dyslexia for up-down shifts of attention in the periphery. A visual field processing difference was found, in that the group with dyslexia showed higher costs associated with shifting attention between objects in they LVF. These findings indicate that these adults with dyslexia have difficulty in both the space-based and the object-based components of covert visual attention, and more specifically to stimuli located in the periphery.

KW - Covert attention

KW - Dyslexia

KW - Object-based

KW - Periphery

KW - Shifting attention

KW - Space-based

KW - Visual attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144278238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.017

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 30

EP - 34

JO - Brain and Cognition

JF - Brain and Cognition

SN - 0278-2626

IS - 1

ER -