Abstract
In the field of antenatal care, there is limited research studying communication between
midwives and pregnant women in authentic consultations. This paper addresses this
research gap. Based on transcripts of 16 antenatal consultations from a private
obstetric practice, we examine agreements as examples of affiliation in the
consultations. Using conversation analysis, we discuss ways that agreement is
accomplished in this institutional setting. We identify clusters of back-to-back
agreements between midwives and women and upgraded and high-grade agreements.
Through agreements, midwives validate and endorse women¿s knowledge while also
claiming their own knowledge about issues of pregnancy. Through these
conversational strategies, the midwives enact institutionally relevant goals of
providing support and treating the woman as having knowledge and expertise about
her body and pregnancy, goals which are aligned with clinical practice guidelines for
antenatal care and the code of ethics for midwives.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 273-289 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Linguistics |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2016 |