Aligning top-down and bottom-up in development planning

The case of Bhutan

Dawa Wangchuk, Mark Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Effective planning makes a vital contribution to developmental success. It is generally perceived as being either centralized (top-down) or decentralized (bottom-up). Centralized planning dominated the early development decades, but disappointing results greatly lessened its appeal and paved the way for participatory and decentralized planning. Both types of planning are evident today, but the question has arisen as to whether top-down and bottom-up planning can be successfully combined into one effective, efficient, and popular system. This question is examined through the case of Bhutan where central planning was introduced at the outset of the country's push for modernization and today leads the way in the country's pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH). However, central planning has been complemented with decentralized participatory planning at the subnational levels. Success in aligning the two planning modes has been achieved by incremental development of the planning system, orientation to the unifying national vision of GNH, a powerful central planning agency, actors at all levels who are able and knowledgeable in their planning roles, and processes that are well organized and proven to work to the satisfaction of all participants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-68
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Administration and Development
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Bhutan
development planning
planning
happiness
planning system
modernization
appeal

Cite this

@article{15a2de4a818f4209b4988f0cc560e157,
title = "Aligning top-down and bottom-up in development planning: The case of Bhutan",
abstract = "Effective planning makes a vital contribution to developmental success. It is generally perceived as being either centralized (top-down) or decentralized (bottom-up). Centralized planning dominated the early development decades, but disappointing results greatly lessened its appeal and paved the way for participatory and decentralized planning. Both types of planning are evident today, but the question has arisen as to whether top-down and bottom-up planning can be successfully combined into one effective, efficient, and popular system. This question is examined through the case of Bhutan where central planning was introduced at the outset of the country's push for modernization and today leads the way in the country's pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH). However, central planning has been complemented with decentralized participatory planning at the subnational levels. Success in aligning the two planning modes has been achieved by incremental development of the planning system, orientation to the unifying national vision of GNH, a powerful central planning agency, actors at all levels who are able and knowledgeable in their planning roles, and processes that are well organized and proven to work to the satisfaction of all participants.",
keywords = "Bhutan, central planning, decentralized planning, development planning, participatory planning",
author = "Dawa Wangchuk and Mark Turner",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pad.1848",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "59--68",
journal = "Public Administration and Development",
issn = "0271-2075",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "2",

}

Aligning top-down and bottom-up in development planning : The case of Bhutan. / Wangchuk, Dawa; Turner, Mark.

In: Public Administration and Development, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 59-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning top-down and bottom-up in development planning

T2 - The case of Bhutan

AU - Wangchuk, Dawa

AU - Turner, Mark

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Effective planning makes a vital contribution to developmental success. It is generally perceived as being either centralized (top-down) or decentralized (bottom-up). Centralized planning dominated the early development decades, but disappointing results greatly lessened its appeal and paved the way for participatory and decentralized planning. Both types of planning are evident today, but the question has arisen as to whether top-down and bottom-up planning can be successfully combined into one effective, efficient, and popular system. This question is examined through the case of Bhutan where central planning was introduced at the outset of the country's push for modernization and today leads the way in the country's pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH). However, central planning has been complemented with decentralized participatory planning at the subnational levels. Success in aligning the two planning modes has been achieved by incremental development of the planning system, orientation to the unifying national vision of GNH, a powerful central planning agency, actors at all levels who are able and knowledgeable in their planning roles, and processes that are well organized and proven to work to the satisfaction of all participants.

AB - Effective planning makes a vital contribution to developmental success. It is generally perceived as being either centralized (top-down) or decentralized (bottom-up). Centralized planning dominated the early development decades, but disappointing results greatly lessened its appeal and paved the way for participatory and decentralized planning. Both types of planning are evident today, but the question has arisen as to whether top-down and bottom-up planning can be successfully combined into one effective, efficient, and popular system. This question is examined through the case of Bhutan where central planning was introduced at the outset of the country's push for modernization and today leads the way in the country's pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH). However, central planning has been complemented with decentralized participatory planning at the subnational levels. Success in aligning the two planning modes has been achieved by incremental development of the planning system, orientation to the unifying national vision of GNH, a powerful central planning agency, actors at all levels who are able and knowledgeable in their planning roles, and processes that are well organized and proven to work to the satisfaction of all participants.

KW - Bhutan

KW - central planning

KW - decentralized planning

KW - development planning

KW - participatory planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062349081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pad.1848

DO - 10.1002/pad.1848

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 59

EP - 68

JO - Public Administration and Development

JF - Public Administration and Development

SN - 0271-2075

IS - 2

ER -