(Alternative) Dispute Resolution and Workplace Bullying: Some pros and cons from the coalface

Allison Ballard, Patricia EASTEAL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We wondered how bullying targets who had participated in mediation or conciliation experienced both process and outcome. Specifically, we wanted to identify what variables, if any, affect perceptions of the efficacy of mediation or conciliation. We were also interested in whether settlement necessarily equates with feelings of satisfaction or justice. Accordingly, 10 employee respondents were recruited via a Survey Monkey email invitation to 20 people who had recently participated in one or more tribunal-facilitated conciliation and/or court-referred mediation. Their responses to the four open-ended questions were analysed thematically. The key themes identified were the perceived benefits (and detriments) of participating in ADR, perceptions of bias by the mediator/conciliator practitioner, the positive impact of being legally represented or having legal advice throughout the process, the positive impact of having a support person, feelings of being re-traumatised by the process, feelings of concern about the future repercussions of challenging employer behaviour (including adverse impacts on future employment), and feelings of justice (or lack of it) as a result of the outcome of the process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-109
Number of pages5
JournalAlternative Law Journal
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

exclusion
workplace
mediation
justice
legal advice
employer
employee
human being
lack
trend

Cite this

Ballard, Allison ; EASTEAL, Patricia. / (Alternative) Dispute Resolution and Workplace Bullying: Some pros and cons from the coalface. In: Alternative Law Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 105-109.
@article{548002a4085046789df41140dfd56879,
title = "(Alternative) Dispute Resolution and Workplace Bullying: Some pros and cons from the coalface",
abstract = "We wondered how bullying targets who had participated in mediation or conciliation experienced both process and outcome. Specifically, we wanted to identify what variables, if any, affect perceptions of the efficacy of mediation or conciliation. We were also interested in whether settlement necessarily equates with feelings of satisfaction or justice. Accordingly, 10 employee respondents were recruited via a Survey Monkey email invitation to 20 people who had recently participated in one or more tribunal-facilitated conciliation and/or court-referred mediation. Their responses to the four open-ended questions were analysed thematically. The key themes identified were the perceived benefits (and detriments) of participating in ADR, perceptions of bias by the mediator/conciliator practitioner, the positive impact of being legally represented or having legal advice throughout the process, the positive impact of having a support person, feelings of being re-traumatised by the process, feelings of concern about the future repercussions of challenging employer behaviour (including adverse impacts on future employment), and feelings of justice (or lack of it) as a result of the outcome of the process.",
author = "Allison Ballard and Patricia EASTEAL",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1037969X1604100208",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "105--109",
journal = "Alternative Law Journal",
issn = "1037-969X",
publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",
number = "2",

}

(Alternative) Dispute Resolution and Workplace Bullying: Some pros and cons from the coalface. / Ballard, Allison; EASTEAL, Patricia.

In: Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2016, p. 105-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Alternative) Dispute Resolution and Workplace Bullying: Some pros and cons from the coalface

AU - Ballard, Allison

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We wondered how bullying targets who had participated in mediation or conciliation experienced both process and outcome. Specifically, we wanted to identify what variables, if any, affect perceptions of the efficacy of mediation or conciliation. We were also interested in whether settlement necessarily equates with feelings of satisfaction or justice. Accordingly, 10 employee respondents were recruited via a Survey Monkey email invitation to 20 people who had recently participated in one or more tribunal-facilitated conciliation and/or court-referred mediation. Their responses to the four open-ended questions were analysed thematically. The key themes identified were the perceived benefits (and detriments) of participating in ADR, perceptions of bias by the mediator/conciliator practitioner, the positive impact of being legally represented or having legal advice throughout the process, the positive impact of having a support person, feelings of being re-traumatised by the process, feelings of concern about the future repercussions of challenging employer behaviour (including adverse impacts on future employment), and feelings of justice (or lack of it) as a result of the outcome of the process.

AB - We wondered how bullying targets who had participated in mediation or conciliation experienced both process and outcome. Specifically, we wanted to identify what variables, if any, affect perceptions of the efficacy of mediation or conciliation. We were also interested in whether settlement necessarily equates with feelings of satisfaction or justice. Accordingly, 10 employee respondents were recruited via a Survey Monkey email invitation to 20 people who had recently participated in one or more tribunal-facilitated conciliation and/or court-referred mediation. Their responses to the four open-ended questions were analysed thematically. The key themes identified were the perceived benefits (and detriments) of participating in ADR, perceptions of bias by the mediator/conciliator practitioner, the positive impact of being legally represented or having legal advice throughout the process, the positive impact of having a support person, feelings of being re-traumatised by the process, feelings of concern about the future repercussions of challenging employer behaviour (including adverse impacts on future employment), and feelings of justice (or lack of it) as a result of the outcome of the process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983365289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X1604100208

DO - 10.1177/1037969X1604100208

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 105

EP - 109

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

SN - 1037-969X

IS - 2

ER -