An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature

Gerlese Akerlind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an integrative review of the developing body of literature investigating academics’ ways of understanding research. The resulting review highlights implicit variation between different studies in the focus they have taken to addressing this research question, varyingly emphasising academics’ research intentions, questions, processes and/or outcomes. It is suggested that these four foci represent different dimensions of academics’ understandings of the nature of research. The review is followed by the report of an empirical study that brings these dimensions together in an integrated way by clarifying relationships between academics’ experiences of: research intentions (who is affected by the research), research outcomes (the anticipated impact of the research), research questions (the nature of the object of study), research process (how research is undertaken), and researcher affect (underlying feelings about research). The last dimension, researcher affect, has not been found in previous studies. This may be due to the focus taken in this study on ways of understanding ‘being a researcher’, rather than ways of understanding ‘research’ per se
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-32
Number of pages16
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

literature
research process
experience

Cite this

@article{789496d7f39e443f9c55c8afe48a4841,
title = "An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature",
abstract = "This article provides an integrative review of the developing body of literature investigating academics’ ways of understanding research. The resulting review highlights implicit variation between different studies in the focus they have taken to addressing this research question, varyingly emphasising academics’ research intentions, questions, processes and/or outcomes. It is suggested that these four foci represent different dimensions of academics’ understandings of the nature of research. The review is followed by the report of an empirical study that brings these dimensions together in an integrated way by clarifying relationships between academics’ experiences of: research intentions (who is affected by the research), research outcomes (the anticipated impact of the research), research questions (the nature of the object of study), research process (how research is undertaken), and researcher affect (underlying feelings about research). The last dimension, researcher affect, has not been found in previous studies. This may be due to the focus taken in this study on ways of understanding ‘being a researcher’, rather than ways of understanding ‘research’ per se",
author = "Gerlese Akerlind",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/03075070701794775",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "17--32",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature. / Akerlind, Gerlese.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2008, p. 17-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature

AU - Akerlind, Gerlese

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This article provides an integrative review of the developing body of literature investigating academics’ ways of understanding research. The resulting review highlights implicit variation between different studies in the focus they have taken to addressing this research question, varyingly emphasising academics’ research intentions, questions, processes and/or outcomes. It is suggested that these four foci represent different dimensions of academics’ understandings of the nature of research. The review is followed by the report of an empirical study that brings these dimensions together in an integrated way by clarifying relationships between academics’ experiences of: research intentions (who is affected by the research), research outcomes (the anticipated impact of the research), research questions (the nature of the object of study), research process (how research is undertaken), and researcher affect (underlying feelings about research). The last dimension, researcher affect, has not been found in previous studies. This may be due to the focus taken in this study on ways of understanding ‘being a researcher’, rather than ways of understanding ‘research’ per se

AB - This article provides an integrative review of the developing body of literature investigating academics’ ways of understanding research. The resulting review highlights implicit variation between different studies in the focus they have taken to addressing this research question, varyingly emphasising academics’ research intentions, questions, processes and/or outcomes. It is suggested that these four foci represent different dimensions of academics’ understandings of the nature of research. The review is followed by the report of an empirical study that brings these dimensions together in an integrated way by clarifying relationships between academics’ experiences of: research intentions (who is affected by the research), research outcomes (the anticipated impact of the research), research questions (the nature of the object of study), research process (how research is undertaken), and researcher affect (underlying feelings about research). The last dimension, researcher affect, has not been found in previous studies. This may be due to the focus taken in this study on ways of understanding ‘being a researcher’, rather than ways of understanding ‘research’ per se

U2 - 10.1080/03075070701794775

DO - 10.1080/03075070701794775

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 17

EP - 32

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 1

ER -