An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1

Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes

Timothy McGrath, Gordon WADDINGTON, Jennie SCARVELL, Nick BALL, Rob Creer, Kevin Woods, Damian Smith, Roger Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Additional high-quality prospective studies are needed to better define the objective criteria used in relation to return-to-sport decisions after synthetic (ligament advanced reinforcement system [LARS]) and autograft (hamstring tendon [2ST/2GR]) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in active populations.
Purpose: To prospectively investigate and describe the recovery of objective clinical outcomes after autograft (2ST/2GR) and synthetic (LARS) ACL reconstructions, as well as to investigate the relationship between these clinimetric test outcomes and return-to-sport activity (Tegner activity scale [TAS] score) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (32 LARS, 32 2ST/2GR autograft) and 32 healthy reference participants were assessed for joint laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer), clinical outcome (2000 International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] knee examination), and activity (TAS score) preoperatively and at 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks and 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
Results: There was no significant correlation observed between clinical results using the 2000 IKDC knee examination and TAS score at 24 months (rs = 0.188, P = .137), nor were results for side-to-side difference (rs = 0.030, P = .814) or absolute KT-1000 arthrometer laxity of the surgical leg at 24 months postoperatively (rs = 0.076, P = .553) correlated with return-to-sport activity. Nonetheless, return-to-sport rates within the surgical cohort were 81% at 12 months and 83% at 24 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between physiological laxity of the uninjured knee within the surgical group compared with healthy knees within the reference group (P = .522).
Conclusion: The results indicate that although relatively high levels of return-to-sport outcomes were achieved at 24 months compared with those previously reported in the literature, correlations between objective clinical tests and return-to-sport outcomes may not occur. Clinical outcome measures may provide suitable baseline information; however, the results of this study suggest that clinicians may need to place greater emphasis on other outcome measures when seeking to objectively promote safe return to sport
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume4
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Knee
Autografts
Ligaments
Documentation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Joint Instability
Return to Sport
Lysholm Knee Score
Leg
Healthy Volunteers
Prospective Studies
Population

Cite this

@article{881b76aaf21b46f49fb0c2498b201589,
title = "An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1: Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes",
abstract = "Background: Additional high-quality prospective studies are needed to better define the objective criteria used in relation to return-to-sport decisions after synthetic (ligament advanced reinforcement system [LARS]) and autograft (hamstring tendon [2ST/2GR]) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in active populations.Purpose: To prospectively investigate and describe the recovery of objective clinical outcomes after autograft (2ST/2GR) and synthetic (LARS) ACL reconstructions, as well as to investigate the relationship between these clinimetric test outcomes and return-to-sport activity (Tegner activity scale [TAS] score) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (32 LARS, 32 2ST/2GR autograft) and 32 healthy reference participants were assessed for joint laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer), clinical outcome (2000 International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] knee examination), and activity (TAS score) preoperatively and at 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks and 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Results: There was no significant correlation observed between clinical results using the 2000 IKDC knee examination and TAS score at 24 months (rs = 0.188, P = .137), nor were results for side-to-side difference (rs = 0.030, P = .814) or absolute KT-1000 arthrometer laxity of the surgical leg at 24 months postoperatively (rs = 0.076, P = .553) correlated with return-to-sport activity. Nonetheless, return-to-sport rates within the surgical cohort were 81{\%} at 12 months and 83{\%} at 24 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between physiological laxity of the uninjured knee within the surgical group compared with healthy knees within the reference group (P = .522).Conclusion: The results indicate that although relatively high levels of return-to-sport outcomes were achieved at 24 months compared with those previously reported in the literature, correlations between objective clinical tests and return-to-sport outcomes may not occur. Clinical outcome measures may provide suitable baseline information; however, the results of this study suggest that clinicians may need to place greater emphasis on other outcome measures when seeking to objectively promote safe return to sport",
keywords = "ACL, LARS, autograft, hamstring, knee",
author = "Timothy McGrath and Gordon WADDINGTON and Jennie SCARVELL and Nick BALL and Rob Creer and Kevin Woods and Damian Smith and Roger Adams",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/2325967116672208",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "2325-9671",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "11",

}

An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1 : Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes. / McGrath, Timothy; WADDINGTON, Gordon; SCARVELL, Jennie; BALL, Nick; Creer, Rob; Woods, Kevin; Smith, Damian; Adams, Roger.

In: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 11, 2016, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1

T2 - Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes

AU - McGrath, Timothy

AU - WADDINGTON, Gordon

AU - SCARVELL, Jennie

AU - BALL, Nick

AU - Creer, Rob

AU - Woods, Kevin

AU - Smith, Damian

AU - Adams, Roger

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Additional high-quality prospective studies are needed to better define the objective criteria used in relation to return-to-sport decisions after synthetic (ligament advanced reinforcement system [LARS]) and autograft (hamstring tendon [2ST/2GR]) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in active populations.Purpose: To prospectively investigate and describe the recovery of objective clinical outcomes after autograft (2ST/2GR) and synthetic (LARS) ACL reconstructions, as well as to investigate the relationship between these clinimetric test outcomes and return-to-sport activity (Tegner activity scale [TAS] score) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (32 LARS, 32 2ST/2GR autograft) and 32 healthy reference participants were assessed for joint laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer), clinical outcome (2000 International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] knee examination), and activity (TAS score) preoperatively and at 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks and 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Results: There was no significant correlation observed between clinical results using the 2000 IKDC knee examination and TAS score at 24 months (rs = 0.188, P = .137), nor were results for side-to-side difference (rs = 0.030, P = .814) or absolute KT-1000 arthrometer laxity of the surgical leg at 24 months postoperatively (rs = 0.076, P = .553) correlated with return-to-sport activity. Nonetheless, return-to-sport rates within the surgical cohort were 81% at 12 months and 83% at 24 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between physiological laxity of the uninjured knee within the surgical group compared with healthy knees within the reference group (P = .522).Conclusion: The results indicate that although relatively high levels of return-to-sport outcomes were achieved at 24 months compared with those previously reported in the literature, correlations between objective clinical tests and return-to-sport outcomes may not occur. Clinical outcome measures may provide suitable baseline information; however, the results of this study suggest that clinicians may need to place greater emphasis on other outcome measures when seeking to objectively promote safe return to sport

AB - Background: Additional high-quality prospective studies are needed to better define the objective criteria used in relation to return-to-sport decisions after synthetic (ligament advanced reinforcement system [LARS]) and autograft (hamstring tendon [2ST/2GR]) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in active populations.Purpose: To prospectively investigate and describe the recovery of objective clinical outcomes after autograft (2ST/2GR) and synthetic (LARS) ACL reconstructions, as well as to investigate the relationship between these clinimetric test outcomes and return-to-sport activity (Tegner activity scale [TAS] score) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (32 LARS, 32 2ST/2GR autograft) and 32 healthy reference participants were assessed for joint laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer), clinical outcome (2000 International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] knee examination), and activity (TAS score) preoperatively and at 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks and 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Results: There was no significant correlation observed between clinical results using the 2000 IKDC knee examination and TAS score at 24 months (rs = 0.188, P = .137), nor were results for side-to-side difference (rs = 0.030, P = .814) or absolute KT-1000 arthrometer laxity of the surgical leg at 24 months postoperatively (rs = 0.076, P = .553) correlated with return-to-sport activity. Nonetheless, return-to-sport rates within the surgical cohort were 81% at 12 months and 83% at 24 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between physiological laxity of the uninjured knee within the surgical group compared with healthy knees within the reference group (P = .522).Conclusion: The results indicate that although relatively high levels of return-to-sport outcomes were achieved at 24 months compared with those previously reported in the literature, correlations between objective clinical tests and return-to-sport outcomes may not occur. Clinical outcome measures may provide suitable baseline information; however, the results of this study suggest that clinicians may need to place greater emphasis on other outcome measures when seeking to objectively promote safe return to sport

KW - ACL

KW - LARS

KW - autograft

KW - hamstring

KW - knee

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002168907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2325967116672208

DO - 10.1177/2325967116672208

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 2325-9671

IS - 11

ER -