An international study of clinical education practices in speech-language pathology

Lyndal Sheepway, Michelle Lincoln, Leanne Togher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study identified the clinical placement and supervisory models used within 45 speech-language pathology professional preparation programs in seven English-speaking countries and the drivers influencing the adoption of these models. University personnel completed an on-line survey about the placement and supervisory models used in their programs, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the models in developing student competency, and the factors influencing the adoption of different models. Responses from the survey were analysed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. "Traditional" placement models such as block and weekly placements, as well as traditional supervisory models utilizing a speech-language pathologist as supervisor in a 1:1 student-to-supervisor ratio were the most widely used in the clinical education of speech-language pathologists. "Non- traditional" models, where the overall structure of the practicum experience or the delivery of supervision within the practicum experience has been altered from the traditional models, were used with differing frequency across countries. The major influences on the adoption of non-traditional models included attitudes about the effectiveness of the models, availability of placements, standards of professional associations, and student learning outcomes, particularly in relation to exposure to clinical sub-groups. Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of both traditional and non-traditional placement and supervisory models needs to be developed. To develop this evidence, consistent terminology and a shared understanding of terminology needs to be established.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-185
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Speech-Language Pathology
Students
Education
Terminology
Language
Association Learning
Clinical Studies
Speech-language Pathology
Clinical Education
Pathologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Placement

Cite this

@article{f1084e8b85ea4c90b4781a09b1a097f3,
title = "An international study of clinical education practices in speech-language pathology",
abstract = "This study identified the clinical placement and supervisory models used within 45 speech-language pathology professional preparation programs in seven English-speaking countries and the drivers influencing the adoption of these models. University personnel completed an on-line survey about the placement and supervisory models used in their programs, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the models in developing student competency, and the factors influencing the adoption of different models. Responses from the survey were analysed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. {"}Traditional{"} placement models such as block and weekly placements, as well as traditional supervisory models utilizing a speech-language pathologist as supervisor in a 1:1 student-to-supervisor ratio were the most widely used in the clinical education of speech-language pathologists. {"}Non- traditional{"} models, where the overall structure of the practicum experience or the delivery of supervision within the practicum experience has been altered from the traditional models, were used with differing frequency across countries. The major influences on the adoption of non-traditional models included attitudes about the effectiveness of the models, availability of placements, standards of professional associations, and student learning outcomes, particularly in relation to exposure to clinical sub-groups. Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of both traditional and non-traditional placement and supervisory models needs to be developed. To develop this evidence, consistent terminology and a shared understanding of terminology needs to be established.",
keywords = "Clinical education, clinical placements, students, supervision",
author = "Lyndal Sheepway and Michelle Lincoln and Leanne Togher",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/17549507.2011.491129",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "174--185",
journal = "Advances in Speech Language Pathology",
issn = "1441-7049",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

An international study of clinical education practices in speech-language pathology. / Sheepway, Lyndal; Lincoln, Michelle; Togher, Leanne.

In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 174-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An international study of clinical education practices in speech-language pathology

AU - Sheepway, Lyndal

AU - Lincoln, Michelle

AU - Togher, Leanne

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - This study identified the clinical placement and supervisory models used within 45 speech-language pathology professional preparation programs in seven English-speaking countries and the drivers influencing the adoption of these models. University personnel completed an on-line survey about the placement and supervisory models used in their programs, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the models in developing student competency, and the factors influencing the adoption of different models. Responses from the survey were analysed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. "Traditional" placement models such as block and weekly placements, as well as traditional supervisory models utilizing a speech-language pathologist as supervisor in a 1:1 student-to-supervisor ratio were the most widely used in the clinical education of speech-language pathologists. "Non- traditional" models, where the overall structure of the practicum experience or the delivery of supervision within the practicum experience has been altered from the traditional models, were used with differing frequency across countries. The major influences on the adoption of non-traditional models included attitudes about the effectiveness of the models, availability of placements, standards of professional associations, and student learning outcomes, particularly in relation to exposure to clinical sub-groups. Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of both traditional and non-traditional placement and supervisory models needs to be developed. To develop this evidence, consistent terminology and a shared understanding of terminology needs to be established.

AB - This study identified the clinical placement and supervisory models used within 45 speech-language pathology professional preparation programs in seven English-speaking countries and the drivers influencing the adoption of these models. University personnel completed an on-line survey about the placement and supervisory models used in their programs, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the models in developing student competency, and the factors influencing the adoption of different models. Responses from the survey were analysed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. "Traditional" placement models such as block and weekly placements, as well as traditional supervisory models utilizing a speech-language pathologist as supervisor in a 1:1 student-to-supervisor ratio were the most widely used in the clinical education of speech-language pathologists. "Non- traditional" models, where the overall structure of the practicum experience or the delivery of supervision within the practicum experience has been altered from the traditional models, were used with differing frequency across countries. The major influences on the adoption of non-traditional models included attitudes about the effectiveness of the models, availability of placements, standards of professional associations, and student learning outcomes, particularly in relation to exposure to clinical sub-groups. Further evidence regarding the effectiveness of both traditional and non-traditional placement and supervisory models needs to be developed. To develop this evidence, consistent terminology and a shared understanding of terminology needs to be established.

KW - Clinical education

KW - clinical placements

KW - students

KW - supervision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954485325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/17549507.2011.491129

DO - 10.3109/17549507.2011.491129

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 174

EP - 185

JO - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

JF - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

SN - 1441-7049

IS - 2

ER -