An optimisation approach to increase DNA amplification success of otter faeces

Simone Lampa, Bernd GRUBER, Klaus Henle, Marion Hoehn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)


Faeces have proved to be a suitable non-invasive DNA source for microsatellite analysis in wildlife research. For the success of such studies it is essential to obtain the highest possible PCR amplification success rate. These rates are still relatively low in most carnivorous species, especially in the otter (Lutra lutra). We therefore optimised the entire microsatellite genotyping process by combining our findings with results from previous studies to gain a high rate of reliable genotypes. We investigated the influence of otter faecal quality in relation to the quantity of slimy secretions and three levels of storage periods at –20C on amplification success. Further, we tested the costeffective and time-saving Chelex extraction method against the profitable QIAamp DNA Stool Kit (Qiagen), and compared three PCR methods - a standard single-step PCR protocol, a single-locus two-step PCR procedure and a multiplex two-step PCR procedure - regarding success rate and genotyping errors. The highest amplification success rate (median: 94%; mean: 78%) was achieved using faecal samples consisting only of jelly extracted with the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) immediately after collection and amplified following the time and cost efficient multiplex two-step PCR protocol. The two-step procedure, also referred to as pre-amplification approach, turned out to be the main improvement as it increases amplification success about 11% and reduces genotyping errors about 53%, most notably allelic dropouts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-210
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Genetics
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'An optimisation approach to increase DNA amplification success of otter faeces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this