Analysing teamwork in health care

What matters when clinicians negotiate the continuity of clinical tasks and care responsibilities?

Rick Iedema, Eamon Merrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the ways in which clinicians enact 'being a team', by analysing how they inform one another about critical patient information. The process where this information exchange happens is known as 'clinical handover'. The study that informs this paper spanned ten months of data collection in four hospitals, involving 150 clinicians and five patients. The analysis presented here draws on data collected at one of the hospital sites: an emergency department at a regional tertiary teaching hospital. Our analysis reveals how central clinical handover is to 'being a team' in health care, and how deficiencies in handover weaken clinical teams' ability to provide continuous and safe care for their patients. We further discuss how clinical practitioners' own responses to the footage foregrounded different issues compared to those revealed by formal analysis; namely, issues centring on relationships, and on practical steps to ensure these relationships could be improved. We reflect on the differences between our own formal analysis of the footage, and practitioners' 'lived response' to the footage, and the implications of these differences for how we as analysts conceptualise 'teamness' in organisations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-97
Number of pages13
JournalCommunication Medicine
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Handoff
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Care Team
Tertiary Care Centers
Teaching Hospitals
Hospital Emergency Service
Patient Care

Cite this

@article{2cb37e918b1446278fd46bed37d99f2a,
title = "Analysing teamwork in health care: What matters when clinicians negotiate the continuity of clinical tasks and care responsibilities?",
abstract = "This paper considers the ways in which clinicians enact 'being a team', by analysing how they inform one another about critical patient information. The process where this information exchange happens is known as 'clinical handover'. The study that informs this paper spanned ten months of data collection in four hospitals, involving 150 clinicians and five patients. The analysis presented here draws on data collected at one of the hospital sites: an emergency department at a regional tertiary teaching hospital. Our analysis reveals how central clinical handover is to 'being a team' in health care, and how deficiencies in handover weaken clinical teams' ability to provide continuous and safe care for their patients. We further discuss how clinical practitioners' own responses to the footage foregrounded different issues compared to those revealed by formal analysis; namely, issues centring on relationships, and on practical steps to ensure these relationships could be improved. We reflect on the differences between our own formal analysis of the footage, and practitioners' 'lived response' to the footage, and the implications of these differences for how we as analysts conceptualise 'teamness' in organisations.",
keywords = "Clinical handover, Continuity of care, Discourse analysis, Teamwork, Video-reflexive ethnography",
author = "Rick Iedema and Eamon Merrick",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1558/cam.18429",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "85--97",
journal = "Communication Medicine",
issn = "1612-1783",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "1",

}

Analysing teamwork in health care : What matters when clinicians negotiate the continuity of clinical tasks and care responsibilities? / Iedema, Rick; Merrick, Eamon.

In: Communication Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2016, p. 85-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysing teamwork in health care

T2 - What matters when clinicians negotiate the continuity of clinical tasks and care responsibilities?

AU - Iedema, Rick

AU - Merrick, Eamon

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper considers the ways in which clinicians enact 'being a team', by analysing how they inform one another about critical patient information. The process where this information exchange happens is known as 'clinical handover'. The study that informs this paper spanned ten months of data collection in four hospitals, involving 150 clinicians and five patients. The analysis presented here draws on data collected at one of the hospital sites: an emergency department at a regional tertiary teaching hospital. Our analysis reveals how central clinical handover is to 'being a team' in health care, and how deficiencies in handover weaken clinical teams' ability to provide continuous and safe care for their patients. We further discuss how clinical practitioners' own responses to the footage foregrounded different issues compared to those revealed by formal analysis; namely, issues centring on relationships, and on practical steps to ensure these relationships could be improved. We reflect on the differences between our own formal analysis of the footage, and practitioners' 'lived response' to the footage, and the implications of these differences for how we as analysts conceptualise 'teamness' in organisations.

AB - This paper considers the ways in which clinicians enact 'being a team', by analysing how they inform one another about critical patient information. The process where this information exchange happens is known as 'clinical handover'. The study that informs this paper spanned ten months of data collection in four hospitals, involving 150 clinicians and five patients. The analysis presented here draws on data collected at one of the hospital sites: an emergency department at a regional tertiary teaching hospital. Our analysis reveals how central clinical handover is to 'being a team' in health care, and how deficiencies in handover weaken clinical teams' ability to provide continuous and safe care for their patients. We further discuss how clinical practitioners' own responses to the footage foregrounded different issues compared to those revealed by formal analysis; namely, issues centring on relationships, and on practical steps to ensure these relationships could be improved. We reflect on the differences between our own formal analysis of the footage, and practitioners' 'lived response' to the footage, and the implications of these differences for how we as analysts conceptualise 'teamness' in organisations.

KW - Clinical handover

KW - Continuity of care

KW - Discourse analysis

KW - Teamwork

KW - Video-reflexive ethnography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014943174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1558/cam.18429

DO - 10.1558/cam.18429

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 85

EP - 97

JO - Communication Medicine

JF - Communication Medicine

SN - 1612-1783

IS - 1

ER -