Analysing the relationships between students and mathematics: a tale of two paradigms

Robyn JORGENSEN, Kevin Larkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we argue the need to use inter-disciplinary paradigms to make sense of a range of findings from a research project. We developed a methodology using iPad diaries to uncover young students’ thinking—mathematical, social and affective—so as to better understand their experiences of mathematics. These students, predominantly from year 3 to year 6, were drawn from economically and socially distinct schools in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. This article builds on previous research, where we outlined the unique methodology that we developed over three iterations to collect student attitudinal comments regarding mathematics. The comments we collected gave significant insights into the experiences of, and possibilities for, the mathematics education of young learners. Here, we use these findings to explore the value of two paradigms to explain student experiences towards mathematics among primary school students from different social backgrounds. In so doing, we develop an explanatory model for the socially differentiated outcomes in students’ responses and then use this explanatory model to analyse student responses from the two most socially disparate schools in our research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-130
Number of pages17
JournalMathematics Education Research Journal
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Paradigm
mathematics
paradigm
Methodology
student
Mathematics Education
Distinct
Iteration
experience
social background
Model
Range of data
methodology
Narrative
Experience
Relationships
school
primary school
research project
Values

Cite this

@article{d3ed48389b4c4b1b9091d8c050cbd725,
title = "Analysing the relationships between students and mathematics: a tale of two paradigms",
abstract = "In this article, we argue the need to use inter-disciplinary paradigms to make sense of a range of findings from a research project. We developed a methodology using iPad diaries to uncover young students’ thinking—mathematical, social and affective—so as to better understand their experiences of mathematics. These students, predominantly from year 3 to year 6, were drawn from economically and socially distinct schools in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. This article builds on previous research, where we outlined the unique methodology that we developed over three iterations to collect student attitudinal comments regarding mathematics. The comments we collected gave significant insights into the experiences of, and possibilities for, the mathematics education of young learners. Here, we use these findings to explore the value of two paradigms to explain student experiences towards mathematics among primary school students from different social backgrounds. In so doing, we develop an explanatory model for the socially differentiated outcomes in students’ responses and then use this explanatory model to analyse student responses from the two most socially disparate schools in our research.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Method, Qualitative, Theory, Video diary",
author = "Robyn JORGENSEN and Kevin Larkin",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s13394-016-0183-1",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "113--130",
journal = "Mathematics Education Research Journal",
issn = "1033-2170",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Analysing the relationships between students and mathematics: a tale of two paradigms. / JORGENSEN, Robyn; Larkin, Kevin.

In: Mathematics Education Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, 03.2017, p. 113-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysing the relationships between students and mathematics: a tale of two paradigms

AU - JORGENSEN, Robyn

AU - Larkin, Kevin

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - In this article, we argue the need to use inter-disciplinary paradigms to make sense of a range of findings from a research project. We developed a methodology using iPad diaries to uncover young students’ thinking—mathematical, social and affective—so as to better understand their experiences of mathematics. These students, predominantly from year 3 to year 6, were drawn from economically and socially distinct schools in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. This article builds on previous research, where we outlined the unique methodology that we developed over three iterations to collect student attitudinal comments regarding mathematics. The comments we collected gave significant insights into the experiences of, and possibilities for, the mathematics education of young learners. Here, we use these findings to explore the value of two paradigms to explain student experiences towards mathematics among primary school students from different social backgrounds. In so doing, we develop an explanatory model for the socially differentiated outcomes in students’ responses and then use this explanatory model to analyse student responses from the two most socially disparate schools in our research.

AB - In this article, we argue the need to use inter-disciplinary paradigms to make sense of a range of findings from a research project. We developed a methodology using iPad diaries to uncover young students’ thinking—mathematical, social and affective—so as to better understand their experiences of mathematics. These students, predominantly from year 3 to year 6, were drawn from economically and socially distinct schools in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. This article builds on previous research, where we outlined the unique methodology that we developed over three iterations to collect student attitudinal comments regarding mathematics. The comments we collected gave significant insights into the experiences of, and possibilities for, the mathematics education of young learners. Here, we use these findings to explore the value of two paradigms to explain student experiences towards mathematics among primary school students from different social backgrounds. In so doing, we develop an explanatory model for the socially differentiated outcomes in students’ responses and then use this explanatory model to analyse student responses from the two most socially disparate schools in our research.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Method

KW - Qualitative

KW - Theory

KW - Video diary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015079421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13394-016-0183-1

DO - 10.1007/s13394-016-0183-1

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 113

EP - 130

JO - Mathematics Education Research Journal

JF - Mathematics Education Research Journal

SN - 1033-2170

IS - 1

ER -