Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication

Neda Akbari

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study draws on the Appraisal framework and on the concept of text orientation to investigate the linguistic resources Russian/Ukrainian-speaking undergraduate students use to project their stance when writing business letters in their foreign language (English). It also investigates whether there is a difference between high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) students with respect to the type and frequency of linguistic resources they use to project stance. The findings reveal that, in general, to express their stance, these students make a more frequent use of impersonal subjects, you and we pronouns, Judgement+, Appreciation+, [T-Affect]+, [T-Affect]-, and [T-Judgement]+ than of any other resources. The resources they use assist them in building good will in their interpersonal communication with the audience. The study also reveals that in Letter 1 (a letter containing negative information), HG students use I and [T-Judgement]- less frequently but rely on Appreciation+ more frequently than the LG group. In Letter 2 (a persuasive letter), HG students use impersonal subjects, you pronouns, [TAffect]+, Judgement+, [T-Judgement]+, and Appreciation+ more frequently but [T-Affect]- less frequently than LG students. These findings suggest that in writing business letters, LG students take an unnecessarily direct and subjective stance that portrays a negative image of the writer and the situation, while HG students appraise the situation more objectively and more positively. The findings are further discussed in light of the students' level of English language proficiency and their understanding of writing in particular disciplines and genres.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMetadiscourse in Written Genres
Subtitle of host publicationUncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts
EditorsCiler Hatipogolu, Erdem Akbas, Yasemin Bayyurt
Place of PublicationFrankfurt, Germany
PublisherPeter Lang Publishing
Pages201-221
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9783631720608
ISBN (Print)9783631720622
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

university
communication
student
resources
linguistics
Business Communication
Letters
Non-native Speakers
Stance
interpersonal communication
foreign language
English language
speaking
genre
writer
Resources
Impersonals
Pronoun
Business Letter
Linguistic Resources

Cite this

Akbari, N. (2017). Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication. In C. Hatipogolu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts (pp. 201-221). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/b11093
Akbari, Neda. / Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication. Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. editor / Ciler Hatipogolu ; Erdem Akbas ; Yasemin Bayyurt. Frankfurt, Germany : Peter Lang Publishing, 2017. pp. 201-221
@inbook{16d0049040994b0f8c8fd2d27202d5e9,
title = "Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication",
abstract = "This study draws on the Appraisal framework and on the concept of text orientation to investigate the linguistic resources Russian/Ukrainian-speaking undergraduate students use to project their stance when writing business letters in their foreign language (English). It also investigates whether there is a difference between high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) students with respect to the type and frequency of linguistic resources they use to project stance. The findings reveal that, in general, to express their stance, these students make a more frequent use of impersonal subjects, you and we pronouns, Judgement+, Appreciation+, [T-Affect]+, [T-Affect]-, and [T-Judgement]+ than of any other resources. The resources they use assist them in building good will in their interpersonal communication with the audience. The study also reveals that in Letter 1 (a letter containing negative information), HG students use I and [T-Judgement]- less frequently but rely on Appreciation+ more frequently than the LG group. In Letter 2 (a persuasive letter), HG students use impersonal subjects, you pronouns, [TAffect]+, Judgement+, [T-Judgement]+, and Appreciation+ more frequently but [T-Affect]- less frequently than LG students. These findings suggest that in writing business letters, LG students take an unnecessarily direct and subjective stance that portrays a negative image of the writer and the situation, while HG students appraise the situation more objectively and more positively. The findings are further discussed in light of the students' level of English language proficiency and their understanding of writing in particular disciplines and genres.",
keywords = "Appraisal Framework, Business communication, Non-native speaker writing, Stance, Text orientation",
author = "Neda Akbari",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3726/b11093",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783631720622",
pages = "201--221",
editor = "Ciler Hatipogolu and Erdem Akbas and Yasemin Bayyurt",
booktitle = "Metadiscourse in Written Genres",
publisher = "Peter Lang Publishing",
address = "Switzerland",

}

Akbari, N 2017, Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication. in C Hatipogolu, E Akbas & Y Bayyurt (eds), Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. Peter Lang Publishing, Frankfurt, Germany, pp. 201-221. https://doi.org/10.3726/b11093

Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication. / Akbari, Neda.

Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. ed. / Ciler Hatipogolu; Erdem Akbas; Yasemin Bayyurt. Frankfurt, Germany : Peter Lang Publishing, 2017. p. 201-221.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication

AU - Akbari, Neda

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This study draws on the Appraisal framework and on the concept of text orientation to investigate the linguistic resources Russian/Ukrainian-speaking undergraduate students use to project their stance when writing business letters in their foreign language (English). It also investigates whether there is a difference between high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) students with respect to the type and frequency of linguistic resources they use to project stance. The findings reveal that, in general, to express their stance, these students make a more frequent use of impersonal subjects, you and we pronouns, Judgement+, Appreciation+, [T-Affect]+, [T-Affect]-, and [T-Judgement]+ than of any other resources. The resources they use assist them in building good will in their interpersonal communication with the audience. The study also reveals that in Letter 1 (a letter containing negative information), HG students use I and [T-Judgement]- less frequently but rely on Appreciation+ more frequently than the LG group. In Letter 2 (a persuasive letter), HG students use impersonal subjects, you pronouns, [TAffect]+, Judgement+, [T-Judgement]+, and Appreciation+ more frequently but [T-Affect]- less frequently than LG students. These findings suggest that in writing business letters, LG students take an unnecessarily direct and subjective stance that portrays a negative image of the writer and the situation, while HG students appraise the situation more objectively and more positively. The findings are further discussed in light of the students' level of English language proficiency and their understanding of writing in particular disciplines and genres.

AB - This study draws on the Appraisal framework and on the concept of text orientation to investigate the linguistic resources Russian/Ukrainian-speaking undergraduate students use to project their stance when writing business letters in their foreign language (English). It also investigates whether there is a difference between high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) students with respect to the type and frequency of linguistic resources they use to project stance. The findings reveal that, in general, to express their stance, these students make a more frequent use of impersonal subjects, you and we pronouns, Judgement+, Appreciation+, [T-Affect]+, [T-Affect]-, and [T-Judgement]+ than of any other resources. The resources they use assist them in building good will in their interpersonal communication with the audience. The study also reveals that in Letter 1 (a letter containing negative information), HG students use I and [T-Judgement]- less frequently but rely on Appreciation+ more frequently than the LG group. In Letter 2 (a persuasive letter), HG students use impersonal subjects, you pronouns, [TAffect]+, Judgement+, [T-Judgement]+, and Appreciation+ more frequently but [T-Affect]- less frequently than LG students. These findings suggest that in writing business letters, LG students take an unnecessarily direct and subjective stance that portrays a negative image of the writer and the situation, while HG students appraise the situation more objectively and more positively. The findings are further discussed in light of the students' level of English language proficiency and their understanding of writing in particular disciplines and genres.

KW - Appraisal Framework

KW - Business communication

KW - Non-native speaker writing

KW - Stance

KW - Text orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033565689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/constraints-authorial-stance-accounting-phd-theses-nigerian-university

U2 - 10.3726/b11093

DO - 10.3726/b11093

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783631720622

SP - 201

EP - 221

BT - Metadiscourse in Written Genres

A2 - Hatipogolu, Ciler

A2 - Akbas, Erdem

A2 - Bayyurt, Yasemin

PB - Peter Lang Publishing

CY - Frankfurt, Germany

ER -

Akbari N. Analysis of stance in the writing of non-native speaker university students in business communication. In Hatipogolu C, Akbas E, Bayyurt Y, editors, Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing. 2017. p. 201-221 https://doi.org/10.3726/b11093