Ankle restrictive firefighting boots alter the lumbar biomechanics during landing tasks

Vy Vu, Anthony Walker, Nick Ball, Wayne Spratford

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Firefighters incur high incidences of lower back and body injuries. Firefighting boots, with specific design requirements, have been shown to reduce ankle range of motion. This reduction has been associated with impaired force dissipation and lower body kinematic alterations. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between firefighting boots, lumbar biomechanics and load carriage during landing. Our data indicates that when wearing firefighting boots, lumbar forces increased and kinematics changed in frontal and transverse planes. These changes may be occurring due to the restrictive shaft of the firefighting boot reducing ankle range of motion. Comparisons between unloaded and loaded conditions also showed increased changes in lumbar biomechanics, independent of footwear worn. Therefore, wearing firefighting boots, in addition to operational loading, may be placing firefighters at greater risk of lumbar injuries. Future research investigating firefighting boots and additional load carriage on lower body biomechanics during landing is recommended.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)123-129
    Number of pages7
    JournalApplied Ergonomics
    Volume65
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Biomechanics
    Landing
    Biomechanical Phenomena
    Ankle
    Firefighters
    Kinematics
    Articular Range of Motion
    Back Injuries
    incidence
    Incidence
    Wounds and Injuries

    Cite this

    @article{655ef68859094baab5ab7157006239a9,
    title = "Ankle restrictive firefighting boots alter the lumbar biomechanics during landing tasks",
    abstract = "Firefighters incur high incidences of lower back and body injuries. Firefighting boots, with specific design requirements, have been shown to reduce ankle range of motion. This reduction has been associated with impaired force dissipation and lower body kinematic alterations. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between firefighting boots, lumbar biomechanics and load carriage during landing. Our data indicates that when wearing firefighting boots, lumbar forces increased and kinematics changed in frontal and transverse planes. These changes may be occurring due to the restrictive shaft of the firefighting boot reducing ankle range of motion. Comparisons between unloaded and loaded conditions also showed increased changes in lumbar biomechanics, independent of footwear worn. Therefore, wearing firefighting boots, in addition to operational loading, may be placing firefighters at greater risk of lumbar injuries. Future research investigating firefighting boots and additional load carriage on lower body biomechanics during landing is recommended.",
    keywords = "Firefighting boots, Landing, Lumbar",
    author = "Vy Vu and Anthony Walker and Nick Ball and Wayne Spratford",
    year = "2017",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "123--129",
    journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
    issn = "0003-6870",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    Ankle restrictive firefighting boots alter the lumbar biomechanics during landing tasks. / Vu, Vy; Walker, Anthony; Ball, Nick; Spratford, Wayne.

    In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 65, 01.11.2017, p. 123-129.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ankle restrictive firefighting boots alter the lumbar biomechanics during landing tasks

    AU - Vu, Vy

    AU - Walker, Anthony

    AU - Ball, Nick

    AU - Spratford, Wayne

    PY - 2017/11/1

    Y1 - 2017/11/1

    N2 - Firefighters incur high incidences of lower back and body injuries. Firefighting boots, with specific design requirements, have been shown to reduce ankle range of motion. This reduction has been associated with impaired force dissipation and lower body kinematic alterations. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between firefighting boots, lumbar biomechanics and load carriage during landing. Our data indicates that when wearing firefighting boots, lumbar forces increased and kinematics changed in frontal and transverse planes. These changes may be occurring due to the restrictive shaft of the firefighting boot reducing ankle range of motion. Comparisons between unloaded and loaded conditions also showed increased changes in lumbar biomechanics, independent of footwear worn. Therefore, wearing firefighting boots, in addition to operational loading, may be placing firefighters at greater risk of lumbar injuries. Future research investigating firefighting boots and additional load carriage on lower body biomechanics during landing is recommended.

    AB - Firefighters incur high incidences of lower back and body injuries. Firefighting boots, with specific design requirements, have been shown to reduce ankle range of motion. This reduction has been associated with impaired force dissipation and lower body kinematic alterations. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between firefighting boots, lumbar biomechanics and load carriage during landing. Our data indicates that when wearing firefighting boots, lumbar forces increased and kinematics changed in frontal and transverse planes. These changes may be occurring due to the restrictive shaft of the firefighting boot reducing ankle range of motion. Comparisons between unloaded and loaded conditions also showed increased changes in lumbar biomechanics, independent of footwear worn. Therefore, wearing firefighting boots, in addition to operational loading, may be placing firefighters at greater risk of lumbar injuries. Future research investigating firefighting boots and additional load carriage on lower body biomechanics during landing is recommended.

    KW - Firefighting boots

    KW - Landing

    KW - Lumbar

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020744898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 123

    EP - 129

    JO - Applied Ergonomics

    JF - Applied Ergonomics

    SN - 0003-6870

    ER -