Anti-politics

beyond supply-side versus demand-side explanations

Emma Vines, David Marsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the light of BREXIT and the election of Trump there has unsurprisingly been even greater interest in the rise in ‘anti-politics’. We recognise anti-politics as an important, although not new, problem. The extant literature emphasise either demand-side or supply-side explanations of the phenomena. In contrast, we argue that this involves a mis-specification of the problem, which neglects the interaction between the demand-side and the supply-side and, thus, leads to underdeveloped putative ‘solutions’. Consequently, this article is structured around four questions that are at the core of any full discussion of anti-politics: What is ‘anti-politics’ and what are its consequences? Is it new? To the extent that it has increased, what are the causes of that increase? and What can be done about it? The empirical evidence we consider is drawn from the British case, both because much work has come out of the UK, and, relatedly, the problem appears especially acute there.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-453
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Politics
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

supply
politics
demand
neglect
election
cause
interaction
evidence
literature
Elections
Empirical Evidence
Interaction
Neglect
Causes

Cite this

@article{b0c29b8140204335953600839dc61490,
title = "Anti-politics: beyond supply-side versus demand-side explanations",
abstract = "In the light of BREXIT and the election of Trump there has unsurprisingly been even greater interest in the rise in ‘anti-politics’. We recognise anti-politics as an important, although not new, problem. The extant literature emphasise either demand-side or supply-side explanations of the phenomena. In contrast, we argue that this involves a mis-specification of the problem, which neglects the interaction between the demand-side and the supply-side and, thus, leads to underdeveloped putative ‘solutions’. Consequently, this article is structured around four questions that are at the core of any full discussion of anti-politics: What is ‘anti-politics’ and what are its consequences? Is it new? To the extent that it has increased, what are the causes of that increase? and What can be done about it? The empirical evidence we consider is drawn from the British case, both because much work has come out of the UK, and, relatedly, the problem appears especially acute there.",
keywords = "Anti-politics, Brexit, UK democracy, Citizen disenchantment, British political tradition",
author = "Emma Vines and David Marsh",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1057/s41293-017-0053-9",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "433--453",
journal = "British Politics",
issn = "1746-918X",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "4",

}

Anti-politics : beyond supply-side versus demand-side explanations. / Vines, Emma; Marsh, David.

In: British Politics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 03.12.2018, p. 433-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anti-politics

T2 - beyond supply-side versus demand-side explanations

AU - Vines, Emma

AU - Marsh, David

PY - 2018/12/3

Y1 - 2018/12/3

N2 - In the light of BREXIT and the election of Trump there has unsurprisingly been even greater interest in the rise in ‘anti-politics’. We recognise anti-politics as an important, although not new, problem. The extant literature emphasise either demand-side or supply-side explanations of the phenomena. In contrast, we argue that this involves a mis-specification of the problem, which neglects the interaction between the demand-side and the supply-side and, thus, leads to underdeveloped putative ‘solutions’. Consequently, this article is structured around four questions that are at the core of any full discussion of anti-politics: What is ‘anti-politics’ and what are its consequences? Is it new? To the extent that it has increased, what are the causes of that increase? and What can be done about it? The empirical evidence we consider is drawn from the British case, both because much work has come out of the UK, and, relatedly, the problem appears especially acute there.

AB - In the light of BREXIT and the election of Trump there has unsurprisingly been even greater interest in the rise in ‘anti-politics’. We recognise anti-politics as an important, although not new, problem. The extant literature emphasise either demand-side or supply-side explanations of the phenomena. In contrast, we argue that this involves a mis-specification of the problem, which neglects the interaction between the demand-side and the supply-side and, thus, leads to underdeveloped putative ‘solutions’. Consequently, this article is structured around four questions that are at the core of any full discussion of anti-politics: What is ‘anti-politics’ and what are its consequences? Is it new? To the extent that it has increased, what are the causes of that increase? and What can be done about it? The empirical evidence we consider is drawn from the British case, both because much work has come out of the UK, and, relatedly, the problem appears especially acute there.

KW - Anti-politics

KW - Brexit

KW - UK democracy

KW - Citizen disenchantment

KW - British political tradition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024376767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/antipolitics-beyond-supplyside-versus-demandside-explanations

U2 - 10.1057/s41293-017-0053-9

DO - 10.1057/s41293-017-0053-9

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 433

EP - 453

JO - British Politics

JF - British Politics

SN - 1746-918X

IS - 4

ER -