Applying language technology to nursing documents

Pros and cons with a focus on ethics

Hanna Suominen, Tuija Lehtikunnas, Barbro Back, Helena Karsten, Tapio I. Salakoski, Sanna Salanterä

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The present study discusses ethics in building and using applications based on natural language processing in electronic nursing documentation. Specifically, we first focus on the question of how patient confidentiality can be ensured in developing language technology for the nursing documentation domain. Then, we identify and theoretically analyze the ethical outcomes which arise when using natural language processing to support clinical judgement and decision-making. In total, we put forward and justify 10 claims related to ethics in applying language technology to nursing documents. Methods: A review of recent scientific articles related to ethics in electronic patient records or in the utilization of large databases was conducted. Then, the results were compared with ethical guidelines for nurses and the Finnish legislation covering health care and processing of personal data. Finally, the practical experiences of the authors in applying the methods of natural language processing to nursing documents were appended. Results: Patient records supplemented with natural language processing capabilities may help nurses give better, more efficient and more individualized care for their patients. In addition, language technology may facilitate patients' possibility to receive truthful information about their health and improve the nature of narratives. Because of these benefits, research about the use of language technology in narratives should be encouraged. In contrast, privacy-sensitive health care documentation brings specific ethical concerns and difficulties to the natural language processing of nursing documents. Therefore, when developing natural language processing tools, patient confidentiality must be ensured. While using the tools, health care personnel should always be responsible for the clinical judgement and decision-making. One should also consider that the use of language technology in nursing narratives may threaten patients' rights by using documentation collected for other purposes. Conclusions: Applying language technology to nursing documents may, on the one hand, contribute to the quality of care, but, on the other hand, threaten patient confidentiality. As an overall conclusion, natural language processing of nursing documents holds the promise of great benefits if the potential risks are taken into consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S293-S301
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume76
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Natural Language Processing
Ethics
Nursing
Language
Technology
Documentation
Confidentiality
Delivery of Health Care
Nurses
Ethical Analysis
Quality of Health Care
Privacy
Patient Rights
Legislation
Health Personnel
Patient Care
Databases
Guidelines
Health

Cite this

Suominen, H., Lehtikunnas, T., Back, B., Karsten, H., Salakoski, T. I., & Salanterä, S. (2007). Applying language technology to nursing documents: Pros and cons with a focus on ethics. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(SUPPL. 2), S293-S301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.006
Suominen, Hanna ; Lehtikunnas, Tuija ; Back, Barbro ; Karsten, Helena ; Salakoski, Tapio I. ; Salanterä, Sanna. / Applying language technology to nursing documents : Pros and cons with a focus on ethics. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2007 ; Vol. 76, No. SUPPL. 2. pp. S293-S301.
@article{bea8db5465eb46ef8e4d6781de15722e,
title = "Applying language technology to nursing documents: Pros and cons with a focus on ethics",
abstract = "Objectives: The present study discusses ethics in building and using applications based on natural language processing in electronic nursing documentation. Specifically, we first focus on the question of how patient confidentiality can be ensured in developing language technology for the nursing documentation domain. Then, we identify and theoretically analyze the ethical outcomes which arise when using natural language processing to support clinical judgement and decision-making. In total, we put forward and justify 10 claims related to ethics in applying language technology to nursing documents. Methods: A review of recent scientific articles related to ethics in electronic patient records or in the utilization of large databases was conducted. Then, the results were compared with ethical guidelines for nurses and the Finnish legislation covering health care and processing of personal data. Finally, the practical experiences of the authors in applying the methods of natural language processing to nursing documents were appended. Results: Patient records supplemented with natural language processing capabilities may help nurses give better, more efficient and more individualized care for their patients. In addition, language technology may facilitate patients' possibility to receive truthful information about their health and improve the nature of narratives. Because of these benefits, research about the use of language technology in narratives should be encouraged. In contrast, privacy-sensitive health care documentation brings specific ethical concerns and difficulties to the natural language processing of nursing documents. Therefore, when developing natural language processing tools, patient confidentiality must be ensured. While using the tools, health care personnel should always be responsible for the clinical judgement and decision-making. One should also consider that the use of language technology in nursing narratives may threaten patients' rights by using documentation collected for other purposes. Conclusions: Applying language technology to nursing documents may, on the one hand, contribute to the quality of care, but, on the other hand, threaten patient confidentiality. As an overall conclusion, natural language processing of nursing documents holds the promise of great benefits if the potential risks are taken into consideration.",
keywords = "Computerized patient records, Ethics, Intensive care, Natural language processing, Nursing, Nursing records",
author = "Hanna Suominen and Tuija Lehtikunnas and Barbro Back and Helena Karsten and Salakoski, {Tapio I.} and Sanna Salanter{\"a}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "S293--S301",
journal = "International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

Suominen, H, Lehtikunnas, T, Back, B, Karsten, H, Salakoski, TI & Salanterä, S 2007, 'Applying language technology to nursing documents: Pros and cons with a focus on ethics', International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 76, no. SUPPL. 2, pp. S293-S301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.006

Applying language technology to nursing documents : Pros and cons with a focus on ethics. / Suominen, Hanna; Lehtikunnas, Tuija; Back, Barbro; Karsten, Helena; Salakoski, Tapio I.; Salanterä, Sanna.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 76, No. SUPPL. 2, 10.2007, p. S293-S301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying language technology to nursing documents

T2 - Pros and cons with a focus on ethics

AU - Suominen, Hanna

AU - Lehtikunnas, Tuija

AU - Back, Barbro

AU - Karsten, Helena

AU - Salakoski, Tapio I.

AU - Salanterä, Sanna

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objectives: The present study discusses ethics in building and using applications based on natural language processing in electronic nursing documentation. Specifically, we first focus on the question of how patient confidentiality can be ensured in developing language technology for the nursing documentation domain. Then, we identify and theoretically analyze the ethical outcomes which arise when using natural language processing to support clinical judgement and decision-making. In total, we put forward and justify 10 claims related to ethics in applying language technology to nursing documents. Methods: A review of recent scientific articles related to ethics in electronic patient records or in the utilization of large databases was conducted. Then, the results were compared with ethical guidelines for nurses and the Finnish legislation covering health care and processing of personal data. Finally, the practical experiences of the authors in applying the methods of natural language processing to nursing documents were appended. Results: Patient records supplemented with natural language processing capabilities may help nurses give better, more efficient and more individualized care for their patients. In addition, language technology may facilitate patients' possibility to receive truthful information about their health and improve the nature of narratives. Because of these benefits, research about the use of language technology in narratives should be encouraged. In contrast, privacy-sensitive health care documentation brings specific ethical concerns and difficulties to the natural language processing of nursing documents. Therefore, when developing natural language processing tools, patient confidentiality must be ensured. While using the tools, health care personnel should always be responsible for the clinical judgement and decision-making. One should also consider that the use of language technology in nursing narratives may threaten patients' rights by using documentation collected for other purposes. Conclusions: Applying language technology to nursing documents may, on the one hand, contribute to the quality of care, but, on the other hand, threaten patient confidentiality. As an overall conclusion, natural language processing of nursing documents holds the promise of great benefits if the potential risks are taken into consideration.

AB - Objectives: The present study discusses ethics in building and using applications based on natural language processing in electronic nursing documentation. Specifically, we first focus on the question of how patient confidentiality can be ensured in developing language technology for the nursing documentation domain. Then, we identify and theoretically analyze the ethical outcomes which arise when using natural language processing to support clinical judgement and decision-making. In total, we put forward and justify 10 claims related to ethics in applying language technology to nursing documents. Methods: A review of recent scientific articles related to ethics in electronic patient records or in the utilization of large databases was conducted. Then, the results were compared with ethical guidelines for nurses and the Finnish legislation covering health care and processing of personal data. Finally, the practical experiences of the authors in applying the methods of natural language processing to nursing documents were appended. Results: Patient records supplemented with natural language processing capabilities may help nurses give better, more efficient and more individualized care for their patients. In addition, language technology may facilitate patients' possibility to receive truthful information about their health and improve the nature of narratives. Because of these benefits, research about the use of language technology in narratives should be encouraged. In contrast, privacy-sensitive health care documentation brings specific ethical concerns and difficulties to the natural language processing of nursing documents. Therefore, when developing natural language processing tools, patient confidentiality must be ensured. While using the tools, health care personnel should always be responsible for the clinical judgement and decision-making. One should also consider that the use of language technology in nursing narratives may threaten patients' rights by using documentation collected for other purposes. Conclusions: Applying language technology to nursing documents may, on the one hand, contribute to the quality of care, but, on the other hand, threaten patient confidentiality. As an overall conclusion, natural language processing of nursing documents holds the promise of great benefits if the potential risks are taken into consideration.

KW - Computerized patient records

KW - Ethics

KW - Intensive care

KW - Natural language processing

KW - Nursing

KW - Nursing records

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548200762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - S293-S301

JO - International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing

JF - International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing

SN - 1386-5056

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -