Appraising and funding participatory research in health promotion

M. Anne George, Mark Daniel, Lawrence W. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participatory action research combines research, education and social action. Each of these elements reflects health education research and practice. Indeed, health education, health promotion and participatory research have converged, in these respects. Participatory research is well suited to the philosophies and theories underpinning community-based health education and health promotion. The nature of participatory research is such that funding agencies, especially those awarding research funds, tend to be challenged in their attempts to assess proposals. This is true at least for those agencies operating under traditional criteria for reviewing standards, which may not be appropriate for participatory research. As well, it may reflect a broader lack of common understanding about the processes and expectations, the apparent untidiness of projects (comparing with traditional research) which by their nature offer no standard methods, deadlines, procedures or predetermined outcome measures. The Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion [1], commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada, attempted to clarify the topic by providing a working definition and a set of guidelines for use by funding agencies when appraising projects purporting to be participatory research. The guidelines emphasize how the nominal ways of conducting health research in populations need to adapt to meet the educational and policy expectations of participatory research. The study also examined current practical examples of participatory research in the field of health promotion in Canada. This summary of the results of the project provides detailed guidelines flowing from a review of experience in the field and consultation with groups engaged in participatory research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-187
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Quarterly of Community Health Education
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Promotion
health promotion
funding
Research
Health Education
Guidelines
Canada
Health Services Research
Financial Management
action research
Referral and Consultation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

@article{d4b990c38de4409c9d958b25f060e165,
title = "Appraising and funding participatory research in health promotion",
abstract = "Participatory action research combines research, education and social action. Each of these elements reflects health education research and practice. Indeed, health education, health promotion and participatory research have converged, in these respects. Participatory research is well suited to the philosophies and theories underpinning community-based health education and health promotion. The nature of participatory research is such that funding agencies, especially those awarding research funds, tend to be challenged in their attempts to assess proposals. This is true at least for those agencies operating under traditional criteria for reviewing standards, which may not be appropriate for participatory research. As well, it may reflect a broader lack of common understanding about the processes and expectations, the apparent untidiness of projects (comparing with traditional research) which by their nature offer no standard methods, deadlines, procedures or predetermined outcome measures. The Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion [1], commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada, attempted to clarify the topic by providing a working definition and a set of guidelines for use by funding agencies when appraising projects purporting to be participatory research. The guidelines emphasize how the nominal ways of conducting health research in populations need to adapt to meet the educational and policy expectations of participatory research. The study also examined current practical examples of participatory research in the field of health promotion in Canada. This summary of the results of the project provides detailed guidelines flowing from a review of experience in the field and consultation with groups engaged in participatory research.",
keywords = "consumer participation, Health education, Health services research",
author = "George, {M. Anne} and Mark Daniel and Green, {Lawrence W.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.2190/R031-N661-H762-7015",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "171--187",
journal = "International Quarterly of Community Health Education",
issn = "0272-684X",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Appraising and funding participatory research in health promotion. / George, M. Anne; Daniel, Mark; Green, Lawrence W.

In: International Quarterly of Community Health Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2006, p. 171-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appraising and funding participatory research in health promotion

AU - George, M. Anne

AU - Daniel, Mark

AU - Green, Lawrence W.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Participatory action research combines research, education and social action. Each of these elements reflects health education research and practice. Indeed, health education, health promotion and participatory research have converged, in these respects. Participatory research is well suited to the philosophies and theories underpinning community-based health education and health promotion. The nature of participatory research is such that funding agencies, especially those awarding research funds, tend to be challenged in their attempts to assess proposals. This is true at least for those agencies operating under traditional criteria for reviewing standards, which may not be appropriate for participatory research. As well, it may reflect a broader lack of common understanding about the processes and expectations, the apparent untidiness of projects (comparing with traditional research) which by their nature offer no standard methods, deadlines, procedures or predetermined outcome measures. The Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion [1], commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada, attempted to clarify the topic by providing a working definition and a set of guidelines for use by funding agencies when appraising projects purporting to be participatory research. The guidelines emphasize how the nominal ways of conducting health research in populations need to adapt to meet the educational and policy expectations of participatory research. The study also examined current practical examples of participatory research in the field of health promotion in Canada. This summary of the results of the project provides detailed guidelines flowing from a review of experience in the field and consultation with groups engaged in participatory research.

AB - Participatory action research combines research, education and social action. Each of these elements reflects health education research and practice. Indeed, health education, health promotion and participatory research have converged, in these respects. Participatory research is well suited to the philosophies and theories underpinning community-based health education and health promotion. The nature of participatory research is such that funding agencies, especially those awarding research funds, tend to be challenged in their attempts to assess proposals. This is true at least for those agencies operating under traditional criteria for reviewing standards, which may not be appropriate for participatory research. As well, it may reflect a broader lack of common understanding about the processes and expectations, the apparent untidiness of projects (comparing with traditional research) which by their nature offer no standard methods, deadlines, procedures or predetermined outcome measures. The Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion [1], commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada, attempted to clarify the topic by providing a working definition and a set of guidelines for use by funding agencies when appraising projects purporting to be participatory research. The guidelines emphasize how the nominal ways of conducting health research in populations need to adapt to meet the educational and policy expectations of participatory research. The study also examined current practical examples of participatory research in the field of health promotion in Canada. This summary of the results of the project provides detailed guidelines flowing from a review of experience in the field and consultation with groups engaged in participatory research.

KW - consumer participation

KW - Health education

KW - Health services research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35349008976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/R031-N661-H762-7015

DO - 10.2190/R031-N661-H762-7015

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 171

EP - 187

JO - International Quarterly of Community Health Education

JF - International Quarterly of Community Health Education

SN - 0272-684X

IS - 2

ER -