Are Environmental Water Advisory Groups an Effective Form of Localism

Lain DARE, Anna Lukasiewicz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A reduction in the legitimacy of top-down governance approaches has resulted in many government agencies using decentralised governance approaches, including localism. However, the effective implementation of localism is challenging. Localism aims to encourage innovative context-based solutions; however unanticipated implementation problems often constrain localism outcomes. There is a significant gap in our understanding of localism in practice, with a better understanding essential to improve localism design and implementation. This paper contributes to addressing this gap through an empirical examination of localism in action. Using the CLEAR framework, we evaluate the decentralised governance of environmental water in the Australian state of New South Wales, a contentious, uncertain and multi-level governance environment. Qualitative interviews with 58 Environmental Water Advisory Group members identified barriers to an effective localism approach, including issues of access and capacity development, transparency of decision-making outcomes and power inequities. This understanding enables the development of strategies for improved localism practice
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages205-228
    Number of pages24
    JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
    Volume62
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2019

    Fingerprint

    governance approach
    governance
    water
    Water
    transparency
    Transparency
    multi-level-governance
    Group
    Decision making
    decision making
    government agency
    qualitative interview
    group membership
    legitimacy
    examination

    Cite this

    @article{6b296494b6c44341b8fcb99025473d62,
    title = "Are Environmental Water Advisory Groups an Effective Form of Localism",
    abstract = "A reduction in the legitimacy of top-down governance approaches has resulted in many government agencies using decentralised governance approaches, including localism. However, the effective implementation of localism is challenging. Localism aims to encourage innovative context-based solutions; however unanticipated implementation problems often constrain localism outcomes. There is a significant gap in our understanding of localism in practice, with a better understanding essential to improve localism design and implementation. This paper contributes to addressing this gap through an empirical examination of localism in action. Using the CLEAR framework, we evaluate the decentralised governance of environmental water in the Australian state of New South Wales, a contentious, uncertain and multi-level governance environment. Qualitative interviews with 58 Environmental Water Advisory Group members identified barriers to an effective localism approach, including issues of access and capacity development, transparency of decision-making outcomes and power inequities. This understanding enables the development of strategies for improved localism practice",
    keywords = "CLEAR framework, decentralisation, deliberation, environmental water management, public participation",
    author = "Lain DARE and Anna Lukasiewicz",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1080/09640568.2017.1406343",
    language = "English",
    volume = "62",
    pages = "205--228",
    journal = "Planning Outlook",
    issn = "0964-0568",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Are Environmental Water Advisory Groups an Effective Form of Localism. / DARE, Lain; Lukasiewicz, Anna.

    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 62, No. 2, 28.01.2019, p. 205-228.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Are Environmental Water Advisory Groups an Effective Form of Localism

    AU - DARE, Lain

    AU - Lukasiewicz, Anna

    PY - 2019/1/28

    Y1 - 2019/1/28

    N2 - A reduction in the legitimacy of top-down governance approaches has resulted in many government agencies using decentralised governance approaches, including localism. However, the effective implementation of localism is challenging. Localism aims to encourage innovative context-based solutions; however unanticipated implementation problems often constrain localism outcomes. There is a significant gap in our understanding of localism in practice, with a better understanding essential to improve localism design and implementation. This paper contributes to addressing this gap through an empirical examination of localism in action. Using the CLEAR framework, we evaluate the decentralised governance of environmental water in the Australian state of New South Wales, a contentious, uncertain and multi-level governance environment. Qualitative interviews with 58 Environmental Water Advisory Group members identified barriers to an effective localism approach, including issues of access and capacity development, transparency of decision-making outcomes and power inequities. This understanding enables the development of strategies for improved localism practice

    AB - A reduction in the legitimacy of top-down governance approaches has resulted in many government agencies using decentralised governance approaches, including localism. However, the effective implementation of localism is challenging. Localism aims to encourage innovative context-based solutions; however unanticipated implementation problems often constrain localism outcomes. There is a significant gap in our understanding of localism in practice, with a better understanding essential to improve localism design and implementation. This paper contributes to addressing this gap through an empirical examination of localism in action. Using the CLEAR framework, we evaluate the decentralised governance of environmental water in the Australian state of New South Wales, a contentious, uncertain and multi-level governance environment. Qualitative interviews with 58 Environmental Water Advisory Group members identified barriers to an effective localism approach, including issues of access and capacity development, transparency of decision-making outcomes and power inequities. This understanding enables the development of strategies for improved localism practice

    KW - CLEAR framework

    KW - decentralisation

    KW - deliberation

    KW - environmental water management

    KW - public participation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041864583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/environmental-water-advisory-groups-effective-form-localism

    U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2017.1406343

    DO - 10.1080/09640568.2017.1406343

    M3 - Article

    VL - 62

    SP - 205

    EP - 228

    JO - Planning Outlook

    T2 - Planning Outlook

    JF - Planning Outlook

    SN - 0964-0568

    IS - 2

    ER -