TY - JOUR
T1 - Are environmental water requirements being met in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia?
AU - Sheldon, Fran
AU - Rocheta, Eytan
AU - Steinfeld, Celine
AU - Colloff, Matthew J.
AU - Moggridge, Brad
AU - Carmody, Emma
AU - Hillman, Terry
AU - Kingsford, Richard T.
AU - Pittock, Jamie
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists with generous funding from the Purves Environment Fund, the Ian Potter Foundation, the Curlew and Melliodora subfunds of the Australian Communities Foundation, Coniston Fund, Garry White Foundation, Crothers Walton Foundation, FWH Foundation, and individual donors from the Australian Environment Grantmakers Network. Acknowledgements
Funding Information:
This research was undertaken as part of a project led by the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists. The authors acknowledge Martin Job and Joel Bailey from the Murray\u2013Darling Basin Authority for assisting with using the EWR assessment tool software. Observed stream gauge data were collected by the State of New South Wales (Water NSW), the State of Victoria (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning), and the Commonwealth of Australia through the Bureau of Meteorology and Murray\u2013Darling Basin Authority. The Murray\u2013Darling Basin Authority provided modelled streamflow data, developed as part of the Murray\u2013Darling Basin Plan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)).
PY - 2024/5/22
Y1 - 2024/5/22
N2 - Context. In implementing the Murray–Darling Basin Plan, jurisdictions have defined environmental water requirements (EWRs) for sites along Basin rivers. EWRs are the flows (frequency, magnitude, duration, and timing) required to achieve environmental outcomes; they are derived from flow-ecology relationships by using best available scientific knowledge. Aims. To assess EWR achievement across the Murray–Darling Basin over a 43.5-year period (1 July 1979 – 31 December 2022) that included periods of drought as well as widespread flooding. Methods. By using a published EWR assessment tool, we analysed the achievement of EWRs for small fresh, large fresh, bankfull and overbank flows for 23 sites. Key results. At 65% of stream gauge sites assessed, most EWRs evaluated had not been met. We also compared analyses of different time periods, namely, a 43.5-year period, and a 10-year period since the Basin Plan was legislated. This highlighted some improvement in EWR achievement for the small fresh EWR. Conclusions and implications. Despite some improvements, the continued lack of achievement in meeting EWRs is likely to be a major contributing factor to the ongoing poor health of channel, wetland (including Ramsar wetlands) and floodplain ecosystems across most of the rivers of the Murray–Darling Basin.
AB - Context. In implementing the Murray–Darling Basin Plan, jurisdictions have defined environmental water requirements (EWRs) for sites along Basin rivers. EWRs are the flows (frequency, magnitude, duration, and timing) required to achieve environmental outcomes; they are derived from flow-ecology relationships by using best available scientific knowledge. Aims. To assess EWR achievement across the Murray–Darling Basin over a 43.5-year period (1 July 1979 – 31 December 2022) that included periods of drought as well as widespread flooding. Methods. By using a published EWR assessment tool, we analysed the achievement of EWRs for small fresh, large fresh, bankfull and overbank flows for 23 sites. Key results. At 65% of stream gauge sites assessed, most EWRs evaluated had not been met. We also compared analyses of different time periods, namely, a 43.5-year period, and a 10-year period since the Basin Plan was legislated. This highlighted some improvement in EWR achievement for the small fresh EWR. Conclusions and implications. Despite some improvements, the continued lack of achievement in meeting EWRs is likely to be a major contributing factor to the ongoing poor health of channel, wetland (including Ramsar wetlands) and floodplain ecosystems across most of the rivers of the Murray–Darling Basin.
KW - environmental water requirements
KW - environmental watering needs
KW - flow–ecology relationships
KW - long-term water plans
KW - Murray–Darling Basin
KW - river flows
KW - stream flow
KW - water management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194110487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/MF23172
DO - 10.1071/MF23172
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194110487
SN - 1323-1650
VL - 75
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Marine and Freshwater Research
JF - Marine and Freshwater Research
IS - 8
M1 - MF23172
ER -