Are female soldiers satisfied with the fit and function of body armour?

Celeste E. Coltman, Julie R. Steele, Wayne A. Spratford, Richard H. Molloy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Design and development of contemporary military body armour has traditionally focused primarily on male soldiers. As the anthropometric body dimensions of male and female soldiers differ, we aimed to determine whether current body armour was meeting fit and functional requirements of female soldiers. One-hundred and forty-seven female Australian Defence Force soldiers completed a 59-item questionnaire regarding the fit and function of current body armour. Most (68%) participants reported wearing ill-fitting body armour, which was associated with increased total musculoskeletal pain and discomfort, as well as pain at the shoulders, abdomen, and hips. Body armour that was too large was more likely to interfere with task performance when it was integrated with a combat belt, as well as when female soldiers performed operationally representative tasks. Modifying body armour design and sizing to cater to the anthropometric dimensions of female soldiers is recommended.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number103197
    Pages (from-to)1-8
    Number of pages8
    JournalApplied Ergonomics
    Volume89
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are female soldiers satisfied with the fit and function of body armour?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this