Arm's Length Bodies in the Australian Capital Territory - Time for Review?

Roger Wettenhall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In the Governing the City State report released in February 2011, reviewer Allan Hawke observed that 'there were currently around 180 boards and committees supported by the ACTPS ACT Public Service (ACTPS), many of which have a statutory basis.... While there are undoubted benefits from these structures, there are inevitable costs to the decision making process, principal among which is "dispersion of government entities and resulting lack of readability of the institutional system"' (Hawke, 2011: 99, quoting from OECD, 2002: 24). Hawke believed the system needed tidying up: along with recommendations relating to several particular entities, he wanted all ACT (Australian Capital Territory) government boards and committees to be reviewed 'with a view to ensuring the role and function of these bodies is clearly understood and that bodies recommended to continue have clearly designed roles and responsibilities that align with the Government's overall strategic direction and objectives' (Hawke, 2011: 7).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-42
    Number of pages18
    JournalAustralasian Parliamentary Review
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    public service
    decision making process
    OECD
    responsibility
    lack
    costs
    time

    Cite this

    @article{48e9a1e7ffb14e7093e8ada723363b36,
    title = "Arm's Length Bodies in the Australian Capital Territory - Time for Review?",
    abstract = "In the Governing the City State report released in February 2011, reviewer Allan Hawke observed that 'there were currently around 180 boards and committees supported by the ACTPS ACT Public Service (ACTPS), many of which have a statutory basis.... While there are undoubted benefits from these structures, there are inevitable costs to the decision making process, principal among which is {"}dispersion of government entities and resulting lack of readability of the institutional system{"}' (Hawke, 2011: 99, quoting from OECD, 2002: 24). Hawke believed the system needed tidying up: along with recommendations relating to several particular entities, he wanted all ACT (Australian Capital Territory) government boards and committees to be reviewed 'with a view to ensuring the role and function of these bodies is clearly understood and that bodies recommended to continue have clearly designed roles and responsibilities that align with the Government's overall strategic direction and objectives' (Hawke, 2011: 7).",
    author = "Roger Wettenhall",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "25--42",
    journal = "Australasian Parliamentary Review",
    issn = "0816-9152",
    number = "1",

    }

    Arm's Length Bodies in the Australian Capital Territory - Time for Review? / Wettenhall, Roger.

    In: Australasian Parliamentary Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2013, p. 25-42.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Arm's Length Bodies in the Australian Capital Territory - Time for Review?

    AU - Wettenhall, Roger

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - In the Governing the City State report released in February 2011, reviewer Allan Hawke observed that 'there were currently around 180 boards and committees supported by the ACTPS ACT Public Service (ACTPS), many of which have a statutory basis.... While there are undoubted benefits from these structures, there are inevitable costs to the decision making process, principal among which is "dispersion of government entities and resulting lack of readability of the institutional system"' (Hawke, 2011: 99, quoting from OECD, 2002: 24). Hawke believed the system needed tidying up: along with recommendations relating to several particular entities, he wanted all ACT (Australian Capital Territory) government boards and committees to be reviewed 'with a view to ensuring the role and function of these bodies is clearly understood and that bodies recommended to continue have clearly designed roles and responsibilities that align with the Government's overall strategic direction and objectives' (Hawke, 2011: 7).

    AB - In the Governing the City State report released in February 2011, reviewer Allan Hawke observed that 'there were currently around 180 boards and committees supported by the ACTPS ACT Public Service (ACTPS), many of which have a statutory basis.... While there are undoubted benefits from these structures, there are inevitable costs to the decision making process, principal among which is "dispersion of government entities and resulting lack of readability of the institutional system"' (Hawke, 2011: 99, quoting from OECD, 2002: 24). Hawke believed the system needed tidying up: along with recommendations relating to several particular entities, he wanted all ACT (Australian Capital Territory) government boards and committees to be reviewed 'with a view to ensuring the role and function of these bodies is clearly understood and that bodies recommended to continue have clearly designed roles and responsibilities that align with the Government's overall strategic direction and objectives' (Hawke, 2011: 7).

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 25

    EP - 42

    JO - Australasian Parliamentary Review

    JF - Australasian Parliamentary Review

    SN - 0816-9152

    IS - 1

    ER -