Articulating performance expectations for scholarship at an Australian regional university

Patrick A. Crookes, Kylie M. Smith, Fabienne C. Else, Ellie Crookes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With an academic workforce undergoing transformation, it is vital that universities rethink how they define and value scholarship through their processes for academic promotion. A key part of this rethink is to review and refine existing documentation about promotion to reflect changing conceptions of scholarly work, in a way that enables scholars from non-traditional academic pathways to be valued equally through the promotion process with their more traditional counterparts. This process of reviewing scholarship was the aim of a promotions review project which began at the University of Wollongong in 2011 and concluded with the production of an Academic Performance Framework (APF). This framework outlines a new way of articulating performance expectations in order to recognise scholarship more broadly, as well as to emphasise more clearly the imperative for academics to be able to articulate evidence of the impact of their work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-97
Number of pages16
JournalTertiary Education and Management
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

promotion
university
performance
documentation
evidence
Values

Cite this

Crookes, Patrick A. ; Smith, Kylie M. ; Else, Fabienne C. ; Crookes, Ellie. / Articulating performance expectations for scholarship at an Australian regional university. In: Tertiary Education and Management. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 82-97.
@article{e0ceec19e95f43d2afe7ddcbd6f97578,
title = "Articulating performance expectations for scholarship at an Australian regional university",
abstract = "With an academic workforce undergoing transformation, it is vital that universities rethink how they define and value scholarship through their processes for academic promotion. A key part of this rethink is to review and refine existing documentation about promotion to reflect changing conceptions of scholarly work, in a way that enables scholars from non-traditional academic pathways to be valued equally through the promotion process with their more traditional counterparts. This process of reviewing scholarship was the aim of a promotions review project which began at the University of Wollongong in 2011 and concluded with the production of an Academic Performance Framework (APF). This framework outlines a new way of articulating performance expectations in order to recognise scholarship more broadly, as well as to emphasise more clearly the imperative for academics to be able to articulate evidence of the impact of their work.",
keywords = "framework, policy, promotion, scholarship",
author = "Crookes, {Patrick A.} and Smith, {Kylie M.} and Else, {Fabienne C.} and Ellie Crookes",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13583883.2016.1151071",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "82--97",
journal = "Tertiary Education and Managment",
issn = "1358-3883",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Articulating performance expectations for scholarship at an Australian regional university. / Crookes, Patrick A.; Smith, Kylie M.; Else, Fabienne C.; Crookes, Ellie.

In: Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 82-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Articulating performance expectations for scholarship at an Australian regional university

AU - Crookes, Patrick A.

AU - Smith, Kylie M.

AU - Else, Fabienne C.

AU - Crookes, Ellie

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - With an academic workforce undergoing transformation, it is vital that universities rethink how they define and value scholarship through their processes for academic promotion. A key part of this rethink is to review and refine existing documentation about promotion to reflect changing conceptions of scholarly work, in a way that enables scholars from non-traditional academic pathways to be valued equally through the promotion process with their more traditional counterparts. This process of reviewing scholarship was the aim of a promotions review project which began at the University of Wollongong in 2011 and concluded with the production of an Academic Performance Framework (APF). This framework outlines a new way of articulating performance expectations in order to recognise scholarship more broadly, as well as to emphasise more clearly the imperative for academics to be able to articulate evidence of the impact of their work.

AB - With an academic workforce undergoing transformation, it is vital that universities rethink how they define and value scholarship through their processes for academic promotion. A key part of this rethink is to review and refine existing documentation about promotion to reflect changing conceptions of scholarly work, in a way that enables scholars from non-traditional academic pathways to be valued equally through the promotion process with their more traditional counterparts. This process of reviewing scholarship was the aim of a promotions review project which began at the University of Wollongong in 2011 and concluded with the production of an Academic Performance Framework (APF). This framework outlines a new way of articulating performance expectations in order to recognise scholarship more broadly, as well as to emphasise more clearly the imperative for academics to be able to articulate evidence of the impact of their work.

KW - framework

KW - policy

KW - promotion

KW - scholarship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961282359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13583883.2016.1151071

DO - 10.1080/13583883.2016.1151071

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 82

EP - 97

JO - Tertiary Education and Managment

JF - Tertiary Education and Managment

SN - 1358-3883

IS - 1

ER -