ASEAN, the “South China Sea” Arbitral Award, and the Code of Conduct: New Challenges, New Approaches

Chris ROBERTS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The article argues that the South China Sea situation involves two fundamental and interdependent considerations: (1) the right of sovereign states to access their legal entitlements unimpeded and (2) the extent to which Asia and the international community value a rules-based regional order. Before there is any possibility of redress on the issue, the article contends that other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, the United States, Australia, and India) will also need to be more strongly engaged with the issue and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities ranging from investments in capacity building to the use of the claimant country's respective coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within their respective Exclusive Economic Zones, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-218
Number of pages29
JournalAsian Politics and Policy
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

ASEAN
China
arbitration
Philippines
police
Japan
stakeholder
India
resources
community
economics
Values

Cite this

@article{94b9f2e3a56c4848ac7fac765bf7c788,
title = "ASEAN, the “South China Sea” Arbitral Award, and the Code of Conduct: New Challenges, New Approaches",
abstract = "The article examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The article argues that the South China Sea situation involves two fundamental and interdependent considerations: (1) the right of sovereign states to access their legal entitlements unimpeded and (2) the extent to which Asia and the international community value a rules-based regional order. Before there is any possibility of redress on the issue, the article contends that other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, the United States, Australia, and India) will also need to be more strongly engaged with the issue and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities ranging from investments in capacity building to the use of the claimant country's respective coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within their respective Exclusive Economic Zones, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling.",
keywords = "ASEAN code of conduct, Indo-Pacific, middle powers, South China Sea, territorial disputes",
author = "Chris ROBERTS",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/aspp.12391",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "190--218",
journal = "Asian Politics and Policy",
issn = "1943-0779",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

ASEAN, the “South China Sea” Arbitral Award, and the Code of Conduct: New Challenges, New Approaches. / ROBERTS, Chris.

In: Asian Politics and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2018, p. 190-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ASEAN, the “South China Sea” Arbitral Award, and the Code of Conduct: New Challenges, New Approaches

AU - ROBERTS, Chris

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The article examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The article argues that the South China Sea situation involves two fundamental and interdependent considerations: (1) the right of sovereign states to access their legal entitlements unimpeded and (2) the extent to which Asia and the international community value a rules-based regional order. Before there is any possibility of redress on the issue, the article contends that other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, the United States, Australia, and India) will also need to be more strongly engaged with the issue and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities ranging from investments in capacity building to the use of the claimant country's respective coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within their respective Exclusive Economic Zones, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling.

AB - The article examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The article argues that the South China Sea situation involves two fundamental and interdependent considerations: (1) the right of sovereign states to access their legal entitlements unimpeded and (2) the extent to which Asia and the international community value a rules-based regional order. Before there is any possibility of redress on the issue, the article contends that other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, the United States, Australia, and India) will also need to be more strongly engaged with the issue and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities ranging from investments in capacity building to the use of the claimant country's respective coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within their respective Exclusive Economic Zones, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling.

KW - ASEAN code of conduct

KW - Indo-Pacific

KW - middle powers

KW - South China Sea

KW - territorial disputes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045918571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/asean-south-china-sea-arbitral-award-code-conduct-new-challenges-new-approaches

U2 - 10.1111/aspp.12391

DO - 10.1111/aspp.12391

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 190

EP - 218

JO - Asian Politics and Policy

JF - Asian Politics and Policy

SN - 1943-0779

IS - 2

ER -